ViewSonic XG2536 25-inch FHD IPS 280 Hz gaming monitor review: Incredibly quick and value priced

The ViewSonic XG2536 is a 25-inch FHD IPS gaming monitor with 280 Hz, Adaptive-Sync and HDR10.

ViewSonic XG2536
Editor's Choice
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

While the ViewSonic is a little less colorful than its competition, it leaves them in the dust for total game performance with extremely low input lag. It’s quicker than the 500 Hz screens I’ve reviewed for half the money.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    One of the fastest gaming monitors available

  • +

    Color accurate without calibration

  • +

    Solid build quality

  • +

    Excellent value

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    No wide gamut

  • -

    No dynamic dimming

  • -

    No USB ports

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

When recommending a gaming monitor, it’s easy to say, “just get an OLED.” Thanks to their unparalleled image quality and super smooth motion processing, they are currently the hot tech. But they haven’t covered all the bases just yet. For example, you can’t get them smaller than 27 inches. While that isn’t a big deal for most, some users have space limitations that necessitate a more efficient footprint. And you won’t find one for much less than $600. Budget constraints can be an impenetrable barrier.

Fear not, you can get a really good gaming monitor for less than $300 if it’s ViewSonic’s XG2536. This 25-inch IPS panel with FHD resolution, 280 Hz, Adaptive-Sync, and HDR is selling for $290 at the time of this writing. It’s also one of the fastest gaming monitors you can buy, even competing with 500 Hz models. Let’s take a look.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Christian Eberle
Contributing Editor

Christian Eberle is a Contributing Editor for Tom's Hardware US. He's a veteran reviewer of A/V equipment, specializing in monitors. Christian began his obsession with tech when he built his first PC in 1991, a 286 running DOS 3.0 at a blazing 12MHz. In 2006, he undertook training from the Imaging Science Foundation in video calibration and testing and thus started a passion for precise imaging that persists to this day. He is also a professional musician with a degree from the New England Conservatory as a classical bassoonist which he used to good effect as a performer with the West Point Army Band from 1987 to 2013. He enjoys watching movies and listening to high-end audio in his custom-built home theater and can be seen riding trails near his home on a race-ready ICE VTX recumbent trike. Christian enjoys the endless summer in Florida where he lives with his wife and Chihuahua and plays with orchestras around the state.

  • cyrusfox
    Impressive cost per Hz, and super input lag.
    https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/bd4a2pJ8tuxzFTUNUKBkfQ-1200-80.png.webpHow does you input lag testing compare to this one at RTINGS.comGuessing very different methodology as your values appear to be a bit longer/slower than what I would expect compared to what I see at their website. Would be interested if you could explain how you are performing the input lag test.

    Thanks for the thorough review!

    It appears the longer I hold out on my next monitor the better the choices continue to be. I was just at Costco and they had the MSI 170Hz 1440p for $150, was only 2 left, was tempted but no time for that past time at the moment. that one shows inputlag at RTING of this MSI monitor
    Native Resolution @ Max Hz(170) 3.5 ms
    Native Resolution @ 120Hz 4.7 ms
    Native Resolution @ 60Hz 8.8 ms
    Backlight Strobing (BFI) 6.9 ms
    I got rid of my 165/180hz 1440 when I moved in December(LG G 27GP850-B), back to my old monitors I had in storage, an old 2018 4k 60hz IPS LG and widescreen 1440p 75hz VA (ick) Samsung panel right now, for work they are better than the laptop screen, haven't even got my desktop rig powered up yet.
    Reply