Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Signin with

Benchmark Results: DirectX 11, High Detail

by

For high detail, we’re testing a wider variety of powerful graphics cards. We’ll turn on post-processing, 8x AF, and DirectX 11-based tessellation. Shadows remain at the Normal setting.

The results are, again, very encouraging. All of the graphics cards tested are capable of 30 FPS minimum at 1920x1080 at this setting, and the Radeon HD 6850 and GeForce GTX 460 1 GB double that minimum frame rate. Clearly, Deus Ex: Human Revolution does not require a monster graphics card for smooth frame rates at high resolutions.

Share:
136
Comments
X
Submit

Comments
Soma42 08/25/2011 5:28 AM
Show
festerovic 08/25/2011 5:44 AM
Hide
-3+

@soma - I personally thought they were average - good, for the time. Not sure if they would stand up to time...

Interesting to read the dual core HT chips outperformed real cores. Can we look forward to the 2600's HT being utilized in games before the next generation of CPUs comes out?

haplo602 08/25/2011 5:53 AM
Hide
-7+

nice review, finaly a new DeusEx game for me :-)

anonymous 08/25/2011 6:02 AM
Show
gerchokas 08/25/2011 6:04 AM
Hide
-4+

Good article - i still remember when i first saw the 2000' Deus Ex graphics on my friend's then-brand-new pc, i thought 'maaan... this looks *friggin* REAL!' I instantly knew my old Pentium cpu needed replacing ASAP...
11 years later, i praise again the great graphics.. but this time they havent cought me off-guard!

tacoslave 08/25/2011 6:20 AM
Hide
-3+

i really wonder how far developers can take the graphics in 3 years.

aznshinobi 08/25/2011 6:28 AM
Hide
--2+

Hmm... The Nvidia cards perform better than the AMD cards of equivalent rank. I'm not playing fanboy but didn't AMD fund the studio? Afterall Eyefinity was made use of.

th3loonatic 08/25/2011 7:41 AM
Hide
-9+

Are there any typos? Coz I see a GTX560 Ti listed as a card used to test, but it doesn't appear in the results.

fyasko 08/25/2011 8:02 AM
Hide
-11+

festerovic :
@soma - I personally thought they were average - good, for the time. Not sure if they would stand up to time...Interesting to read the dual core HT chips outperformed real cores. Can we look forward to the 2600's HT being utilized in games before the next generation of CPUs comes out?



HT isn't the reason dual core SB CPU's beat 6 core thubans. SB is a better architecture. Hurry up Bulldozer!

mayankleoboy1 08/25/2011 8:08 AM
Hide
-2+

@ Don Woligroski
i want the CPU benchmarks at 1080p with highest settings.
benches at 1024x768 are irrelevant. the gamer of today is atleast 1680, preferable 1080.
so please add to the benches. also, this would show the real impact of CPU on FPS.

mattmock 08/25/2011 8:14 AM
Hide
-6+

I have noticed that the new shader based AA modes do a good job reducing jaggies on edges but in some situations they go overboard and lower the image quality significantly. In far cry 2 screen FXAA heavily blurs the grass and foliage where as MSAA keeps those parts sharp. It still seems like 8xQ MSAA is the best option if you have the horsepower for it. (unless of course you can do SSAA)
I would like see more comparison shots of the AA modes in DX, especially shots of plants and busy textures like brick and gravel.

Jax69 08/25/2011 8:18 AM
Show
mattmock 08/25/2011 8:23 AM
Hide
-3+

mayankleoboy1 :
@ Don Woligroskii benches at 1024x768 are irrelevant. the gamer of today is atleast 1680, preferable 1080.so please add to the benches. also, this would show the real impact of CPU on FPS.



Checkout the steam hardware survey, about 24% are at or below 1280 x 1024. I think there are gamers using laptops or budget screens.

Enkal 08/25/2011 9:02 AM
Hide
-1+

Jax69 :
Don't wanna be a fanboy but, i don't know, HardOCP found that the card to beat is the 6970, i rather trust them than Tom's.



I thought HardOCP were known to be very biased in favor of AMD/ATI graphics? On the level of banning people on their forums who say good things about Nvidia (iirc). I wouldnt trust them regarding graphics at all, otherwise it's a good site imho.

I think it's better to check more than two sites if you want a more balanced view, not that Deus Ex needs a state of the art machine.

Jax69 08/25/2011 9:38 AM
Hide
-4+

Enkal :
I thought HardOCP were known to be very biased in favor of AMD/ATI graphics? On the level of banning people on their forums who say good things about Nvidia (iirc). I wouldnt trust them regarding graphics at all, otherwise it's a good site imho.I think it's better to check more than two sites if you want a more balanced view, not that Deus Ex needs a state of the art machine.


the truth is i never trust just one site, but is funny how every site gives it's own verdict, some are biased some are not. the important thing is to choose whatever meets our expectations regardless the brand.

werner123 08/25/2011 10:02 AM
Show
amk-aka-Phantom 08/25/2011 10:07 AM
Hide
-0+

Great, my GPU will max this out :D

Enkal 08/25/2011 10:21 AM
Hide
-5+

werner123 :
Another game favored by nvidia, just hope new amd drivers can catch up.



If I understand correctly the PC version was sponsored by AMD and not Nvidia. I only see an AMD logo on their page and nothing from Nvidia.

amigafan 08/25/2011 10:41 AM
Hide
-1+

Eh my 6970 could max this out no problem, but my Athlon X2 5600 would choke. Eagerly waiting for Bulldozer...

Best offers

Newsletters


OK