Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

CPU Benchmarks

Diablo III Performance, Benchmarked
By

Beyond graphics performance, we also need to consider the capabilities of today's platforms, too. Not everyone has an overclocked Core i7-3960X, which we use to stamp out bottlenecks, allowing our graphics cards to achieve their peak potential.

To that end, we benchmarked Core i5, Phenom II X4, and FX-4000-series quad-core processors at varying clock speeds in order to see what kind of processor power Diablo III needs.

At the highest detail settings with AA enabled, even a 2 GHz Phenom II X4 achieves 80 FPS minimum. Clearly, the game doesn’t need an incredibly potent CPU.

Frame rates stay high, despite a small difference between two and four threads. With a Phenom II X2 able to pump out 76 FPS(minimum), Diablo III players have little to worry about when it comes to owning a fast-enough processor.

Display all 169 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 36 Hide
    Formata , May 7, 2012 4:42 AM
    Oh yes... The epic armageddon of all click-fest's is upon us! In 6 months time I'll bench 100kg with my index finger.
  • 29 Hide
    Murissokah , May 7, 2012 4:49 AM
    So the CPU won't keep us from enjoying the game... nor the GPU... only the calendar then.
  • 23 Hide
    trace_87 , May 7, 2012 5:27 AM
    "Like the originals, the isometric view remains locked in place, and zooming in is not an option."

    Push Z
Other Comments
  • 12 Hide
    dodger_nzl , May 7, 2012 4:37 AM
    Nice to see my GF460 should play it at max settings.
  • 36 Hide
    Formata , May 7, 2012 4:42 AM
    Oh yes... The epic armageddon of all click-fest's is upon us! In 6 months time I'll bench 100kg with my index finger.
  • 29 Hide
    Murissokah , May 7, 2012 4:49 AM
    So the CPU won't keep us from enjoying the game... nor the GPU... only the calendar then.
  • 22 Hide
    sharpiedpanda , May 7, 2012 5:18 AM
    The calendar and your finger stamina :p 
  • -4 Hide
    JoeMomma , May 7, 2012 5:23 AM
    i'm luvin it!
  • 23 Hide
    trace_87 , May 7, 2012 5:27 AM
    "Like the originals, the isometric view remains locked in place, and zooming in is not an option."

    Push Z
  • 11 Hide
    borden5 , May 7, 2012 5:38 AM
    Note that amd 12.4 artifacts doesn't only apply for Diablo 3 alone I got artifact in any game with my 3650 so I have to revert to 12.3
  • 6 Hide
    Anonymous , May 7, 2012 6:03 AM
    so can anyone recommend a good laptop that can play this no lag for under 800?
  • 6 Hide
    Darkerson , May 7, 2012 6:10 AM
    I had a lot of fun with it in the beta. I still cant say Im going to be a fan of the RMT Auction House, but other then that, its a fun game. Between this and Guild Wars 2, Im gonna have a very unproductive summer :D 
  • 13 Hide
    Zero_ , May 7, 2012 6:16 AM
    I would have liked to see a HD7750 in there, as that would be the easiest upgrade for someone who wanted a cheap card with low power draw. It's a bit hard to predict where it'll end up because the HD6850/HD6770 anomaly.
  • 17 Hide
    geotek , May 7, 2012 6:34 AM
    Were any large fights present in the FPS recording? Because of the computers ive tested ive noticed computers with slower CPUs, especially dual cores, would get quite choppy during large fights and all the ragdolls flying everywhere. This problem seemed to either vanish or greatly diminish when physics were changed from high to low. Perhaps the physics are handled by the cpu? If so, this means the cpu testing results may not be a good measure of real world use of the game.
  • 8 Hide
    rantoc , May 7, 2012 6:39 AM
    cinergyHD7870 is on par with GTX580! Now I understand why he didn't even take HD7970 into test. That would have been too embarrassing for nvidia.


    Hardly, Nvidia is the only party that provides extra gfx quality via ambient occlusion for this title and with all thoose monster cards available today i rather use that extra power to get better quality than let it go wasted. So even if i dont get 500+ fps in 2560x1600 with 2x680 sli i do get ambient occlusion as well as insanly good AA making the title look nice. I play the game to enjoy it, not benchmark it!
  • 5 Hide
    gnookergi , May 7, 2012 6:47 AM
    I still use a 9600GT, anyone have any idea how it would work with that?
  • 16 Hide
    whysobluepandabear , May 7, 2012 6:50 AM
    "At 1080p, the Radeon HD 6540 might be considered playable,"

    Don't you mean the 6450?
  • 3 Hide
    blazorthon , May 7, 2012 6:55 AM
    courtlandbso can anyone recommend a good laptop that can play this no lag for under 800?


    A laptop with an A6 or A8 and a 7470 in CF or something similar should do it very well. I know that HP sells those for under $650 and depending on whether or not it's on sale, even cheaper. You could probably get something similar even cheaper elsewhere (HP isn't known for being the cheapest, not even among other OEMs).
  • 7 Hide
    trace_87 , May 7, 2012 7:08 AM
    This article will need another go once the game comes out. You have to have something a bit more taxing than this.
  • 5 Hide
    Gman450 , May 7, 2012 7:10 AM
    I've got a GTS450. Maybe I should be looking somewhere between the HD 6670 and GTX 550Ti..
  • 4 Hide
    Gman450 , May 7, 2012 7:11 AM
    gnookergiI still use a 9600GT, anyone have any idea how it would work with that?

    Well you can perhaps look somewhere around the GT440 or the HD 6670 but don't expect the same FPS.
Display more comments