Shop for Computer Cooling Fans
|
Zalman CNPS7000B-ALCU LED CPU Cooler |
Compare the top 5 lowest prices by hovering your mouse over the product names on the left |
$29.65 |
|
Ultra120 Extreme CPU Cooler | $53.95 | |
|
CNPS9700 LED CPU Cooler | $74.99 | |
|
HDT-S1283 CPU Cooler | $36.99 | |
|
CNPS8700 LED CPU Cooler & Fan | $64.99 |
The CPU Articles
- Intel's 45 nm Penryn CPU: 4 GHz Air Cooled
- Does Cache Size Really Boost Performance?
- AMD's Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Black Edition
- The Truth About PC Power Consumption
- Parallel Processing, Part 1: CPU Cores
- What if Your CPU Cooler Fails?
- $89 Pentium Dual Core that Runs at 3.2 GHz
- Can CPUs Make PCs Faster & Quieter?
- Extreme FSB 2: The Quad-Core Advantage?
- Extreme FSB: Taking the E6750 Beyond 4 GHz
7:06 AM - November 8, 2007 by
Bert Töpelt
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: dual, quad
Topics: Buyer's Guides, Overclocking
Syndication:
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: dual, quad
Topics: Buyer's Guides, Overclocking
Syndication:
Table of Contents:
Performance Winner - Q6600 Provides 5.3% More Performance
Comparing the E6750 and the Q6600 at default clock speeds, we see the quad-core CPU outperform its sibling by an average of 3.8% across our benchmark suite.
When both CPUs are overclocked to their limit, the quad-core extends its lead to 5.3%.
Since more and more applications are being released with quad-core and multi-core support, the Core 2 Quad Q6600 comes out as the winner in our benchmarks.
- Previous page Overclocking Yields 25% Performance...
- Next page Test Setup
