Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Is G-Sync The Game-Changer You Didn’t Know You Were Waiting For?

G-Sync Technology Preview: Quite Literally A Game Changer
By , Chris Angelini

Before we even got into our hands-on testing of Asus' prototype G-Sync-capable monitor, we were glad to see Nvidia approaching a very real issue affecting PC gaming, for which no other solution had been proposed. Until now, your choices were V-sync on or V-sync off, each decision accompanied by compromises that detracted from the experience. When your line is "I run with V-sync disabled unless I can't take the tearing in a particular game, at which point I flip it on," then the decision sounds like picking the lesser of two evils.

G-Sync sets out to address that by giving the monitor an ability to scan at a variable refresh. Such innovations are the only way our industry can disruptively move forward and support the technical preeminence of PCs over consoles and other gaming platforms. No doubt, Nvidia is going to take heat for not pursuing a standard that competing vendors might be able to adopt. However, it's leveraging DisplayPort 1.2 for a solution we can go hands-on with today. As a result, two months after announcing G-Sync, here it is.

The real question becomes: is G-Sync everything Nvidia promised it'd be?

It's always hard to break past hype when you have three talented developers extolling the merits of a technology you haven't seen in action yet. But if your first experience with G-Sync is Nvidia's pendulum demo, you're going to wonder if such a severe and extreme difference is really possible, or if the test is somehow a specific scenario which is too good to be true.

Of course, as you shift over into real-world gaming, the impact is typically less binary. There are shades of "Whoa!" and "That's crazy" on one end of the spectrum and "I think I see the difference" on the other. The most splash happens when you switch from a 60 Hz display to something with a 144 Hz refresh and G-Sync enabled. But we also tried to test at 60 Hz with G-Sync to preview what you'll see from (hopefully) less expensive displays in the future. In certain cases, just the shift from 60 to 144 Hz is what will hit you as most effective, particularly if you can push those really high frame rates from a high-end graphics subsystem.

Today, we know that Asus plans to support G-Sync on its VG248QE, which the company told us will sell for $400 starting next year. That panel sports a native 1920x1080 resolution and refresh rates as high as 144 Hz. The non-G-Sync version won our Smart Buy award earlier this year for its exceptional performance. Personally, though, the 6-bit TN panel is an issue for me. I'm most looking forward to 2560x1440 and IPS. I'm even fine sticking with a 60 Hz refresh if it helps keep cost manageable.

While we expect a rash of announcements at CES, we have no official word from Nvidia as to when other displays sporting G-Sync modules will start shipping or how much they'll cost. We also aren't sure what the company's plans are for the previously-discussed upgrade module, which should let you take an existing Asus VG248QE and make it G-Sync ready "in about 20 minutes."

What we can say, though, is that the wait will be worth it. You'll see its influence unmistakeably in some games, and you'll notice it less in others. But the technology does effectively solve that age-old question of whether to keep V-sync enabled or not. 

Here's another interesting thought. Now that G-Sync is being tested, how long will AMD hold off on commenting? The company teased our readers in Tom's Hardware's AMA With AMD, In Its Entirety, mentioning it'd address the capability soon. Does it have something up its sleeve or not? Between the Mantle-enhanced version of Battlefield 4, Nvidia's upcoming Maxwell architecture, G-Sync, CrossFire powered by AMD's xDMA engine, and rumored upcoming dual-GPU boards, the end of 2013 and beginning of 2014 are bound to give us plenty of interesting news to talk about. Now, if we could just get more than 3 GB (Nvidia) and 4 GB (AMD) of GDDR5 on high-end cards that don't cost $1000...

Display all 176 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 36 Hide
    ubercake , December 12, 2013 7:22 AM
    I'm on page 4, and I can't even contain myself.

    Tearing and input lag at 60Hz on a 2560x1440 or 2560x1600 has been the only reason I won't game on one. G-sync will get me there.

    This is awesome, outside-of-the-box thinking tech.

    I do think Nvidia is making a huge mistake by keeping this to themselves though. This should be a technology implemented with every panel sold and become part of an industry standard for HDTVs, monitors or other viewing solutions! Why not get a licensing payment for all monitors sold with this tech? Or all video cards implementing this tech? It just makes sense.
  • 23 Hide
    expl0itfinder , December 12, 2013 7:11 AM
    Competition, competition. Anybody who is flaming over who is better: AMD or nVidia, is clearly missing the point. With nVidia's G-Sync, and AMD's Mantle, we have, for the first time in a while, real market competition in the GPU space. What does that mean for consumers? Lower prices, better products.
Other Comments
  • 17 Hide
    gamerk316 , December 12, 2013 6:34 AM
    I consider Gsync to be the most important gaming innovation since DX7. It's going to be one of those "How the HELL did we live without this before?" technologies.
  • 16 Hide
    wurkfur , December 12, 2013 7:01 AM
    I personally have a setup that handles 60+ fps in most games and just leave V-Sync on. For me 60 fps is perfectly acceptable and even when I went to my friends house where he had a 120hz monitor with SLI, I couldn't hardly see much difference.

    I applaud the advancement, but I have a perfectly functional 26 inch monitor and don't want to have to buy another one AND a compatible GPU just to stop tearing.

    At that point I'm looking at $400 to $600 for a relatively paltry gain. If it comes standard on every monitor, I'll reconsider.
  • 23 Hide
    expl0itfinder , December 12, 2013 7:11 AM
    Competition, competition. Anybody who is flaming over who is better: AMD or nVidia, is clearly missing the point. With nVidia's G-Sync, and AMD's Mantle, we have, for the first time in a while, real market competition in the GPU space. What does that mean for consumers? Lower prices, better products.
  • 7 Hide
    Anonymous , December 12, 2013 7:13 AM
    This needs to be not so proprietary for it to become a game changer. As it is, requiring a specific GPU and specific monitor with an additional price premium just isn't compelling and won't reach a wide demographic.

    Is it great for those who already happen to fall within the requirements? Sure, but unless Nvidia opens this up or competitors make similar solutions, I feel like this is doomed to be as niche as lightboost, Physx, and, I suspect, Mantle.
  • -6 Hide
    Jgriff , December 12, 2013 7:21 AM
    g sync tv pleeeeeeeeeease
  • 36 Hide
    ubercake , December 12, 2013 7:22 AM
    I'm on page 4, and I can't even contain myself.

    Tearing and input lag at 60Hz on a 2560x1440 or 2560x1600 has been the only reason I won't game on one. G-sync will get me there.

    This is awesome, outside-of-the-box thinking tech.

    I do think Nvidia is making a huge mistake by keeping this to themselves though. This should be a technology implemented with every panel sold and become part of an industry standard for HDTVs, monitors or other viewing solutions! Why not get a licensing payment for all monitors sold with this tech? Or all video cards implementing this tech? It just makes sense.
  • 2 Hide
    rickard , December 12, 2013 7:25 AM
    Could the Skyrim stuttering at 60hz w/ Gsync be because the engine operates internally at 64hz? All those Bethesda tech games drop 4 frames every second when vsync'd to 60hz which cause that severe microstutter you see on nearby floors and walls when moving and strafing. Same thing happened in Oblivion, Fallout 3, and New Vegas on PC. You had to use stutter removal mods in conjunction with the script extenders to actually force the game to operate at 60hz and smooth it out with vsync on.

    You mention it being smooth when set to 144hz with Gsync, is there any way you cap the display at 64hz and try it with Gsync alone (iPresentinterval=0) and see what happens then? Just wondering if the game is at fault here and if that specific issue is still there in their latest version of the engine.

    Alternatively I suppose you could load up Fallout 3 or NV instead and see if the Gsync results match Skyrim.
  • 5 Hide
    Old_Fogie_Late_Bloomer , December 12, 2013 7:25 AM
    I would be excited for this if it werent for Oculus Rift. I don't mean to be dismissive, this looks awesome...but it isn't Oculus Rift.
  • -2 Hide
    hysteria357 , December 12, 2013 7:28 AM
    Am I the only one who has never experienced screen tearing? Most of my games run past my refresh rate too....
  • 1 Hide
    Gundamfan , December 12, 2013 7:45 AM
    i play alot of mmo and tearing apear all the time . this is nice tech i cant wait for 2560x1440. whit G-Sync
  • -5 Hide
    jasonpwns , December 12, 2013 7:46 AM
    TLM: Physx is not that way anymore. The newest gen of consoles can take advantage of Physx now and I'm sure will. That's hardly niche.
  • 9 Hide
    ohim , December 12, 2013 7:54 AM
    I think this is a game changer only on setups that can`t reach 60 fps, being proprietary only to nvidia is kinda shot in the foot, just like phys-x there are some people that care about it but most don`t even ecknowledge it, technically it can run on anything, practically only on nvidia and being a monitor side gimmick i would see this as a monitor company tech thing not graphics card maker closed stuff. I`m more interested in Mantle than this, since it preaches about better multicore cpu performance and better fps on your hardware.

    Mantle (if it will be what they say ) - better CPU performance, better GPU performance, at some point Open Source!?!? , no need for a new monitor.

    G-Sync good on old hardware that can`t reach 60 fps, bad since you need a new monitor, so guys who can`t afford a better GPU will have to get a new monitor ?!?!?!
  • -1 Hide
    pricetag_geek , December 12, 2013 7:55 AM
    You guys should've tried Dead Island with G-Sync, the tearing in this game was really horrible.
  • -1 Hide
    Gundamfan , December 12, 2013 7:55 AM
    I cant wait for G sync on 2560x1440
  • 10 Hide
    Someone Somewhere , December 12, 2013 7:59 AM
    Needs to be open. If it's not in a standard, it won't take off. How many people want to rip open a display (likely voiding warranty) to install a pricey addon card, and then be strongly limited to what other equipment they can use it with.

    Get it standardised and into the DVI/HDMI/DP specs, then it'll take off.

    I wonder if you could just add a flag for variable vertical blanks, and have it send a 'starting next frame' sequence whenever a frame is rendered.

    If it's not included by default in monitors, it'll become the next PhysX. And to do that it has to be platform-agnostic.
  • 2 Hide
    pricetag_geek , December 12, 2013 8:01 AM
    Quote:
    I personally have a setup that handles 60+ fps in most games and just leave V-Sync on. For me 60 fps is perfectly acceptable and even when I went to my friends house where he had a 120hz monitor with SLI, I couldn't hardly see much difference.


    oh really? I envy your eyes.
  • 2 Hide
    ubercake , December 12, 2013 8:09 AM
    Quote:
    I think this is a game changer only on setups that can`t reach 60 fps, being proprietary only to nvidia is kinda shot in the foot, just like phys-x there are some people that care about it but most don`t even ecknowledge it, technically it can run on anything, practically only on nvidia and being a monitor side gimmick i would see this as a monitor company tech thing not graphics card maker closed stuff. I`m more interested in Mantle than this, since it preaches about better multicore cpu performance and better fps on your hardware.

    Mantle (if it will be what they say ) - better CPU performance, better GPU performance, at some point Open Source!?!? , no need for a new monitor.

    G-Sync good on old hardware that can`t reach 60 fps, bad since you need a new monitor, so guys who can`t afford a better GPU will have to get a new monitor ?!?!?!


    Considering mantle, what does GPU performance matter on a screen with input lag or screen with tearing, choppy and blurry video?

    Mantle will not solve this problem. Mantle is supposed to be more of a low-level common API with enhanced GPU performance as a possible advantage. I'm not sure that even compares to what's being discussed here. Maybe I'm way off???

    G-sync will eliminate input lag, tearing and blur and as a result add to the overall realism of the gaming experience.
  • 2 Hide
    Logsdonb , December 12, 2013 8:27 AM
    This will become more important as we migrate to 4k displays. At that resolution, maintaining very high frame rates will become more difficult. Allowing a better experience at lower frame rates will become more important and more valuable.
  • -1 Hide
    renz496 , December 12, 2013 8:47 AM
    Quote:
    I think this is a game changer only on setups that can`t reach 60 fps, being proprietary only to nvidia is kinda shot in the foot, just like phys-x there are some people that care about it but most don`t even ecknowledge it, technically it can run on anything, practically only on nvidia and being a monitor side gimmick i would see this as a monitor company tech thing not graphics card maker closed stuff. I`m more interested in Mantle than this, since it preaches about better multicore cpu performance and better fps on your hardware.

    Mantle (if it will be what they say ) - better CPU performance, better GPU performance, at some point Open Source!?!? , no need for a new monitor.

    G-Sync good on old hardware that can`t reach 60 fps, bad since you need a new monitor, so guys who can`t afford a better GPU will have to get a new monitor ?!?!?!


    the monitor might be expensive right now but it will be good investment if you decide to go that route. at the very least you don't upgrade your monitor as often as gpu. my current monitor has been paired with GTS250, GTX460 and now GTX660 SLI. the only downside is it will locked you to use nvidia gpu only.
Display more comments