Framework Laptop 16 review: the Franken-notebook

Framework introduces replaceable graphics for the first time, along with customizable keyboards and other accessories.

Framework Laptop 16
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The Framework Laptop 16 is the most customizable laptop we've ever seen, with tons of input and port options, and the promise of upgradable graphics. It has a bright screen and solid battery life, but it's expensive, and you could get something with more performance for the price.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Extremely customizable

  • +

    Bright, vivid display

  • +

    Solid battery life

  • +

    Upgradeable graphics… but be cautious

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Similarly priced gaming laptops are much more powerful

  • -

    Keyboard module is mushy

  • -

    More complicated than previous Frameworks, albeit by design

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

I'm not quite sure what the Framework Laptop 16 is. It's a laptop, sure, but it denies traditional categorization. It's Framework's first laptop with discrete (and upgradable) graphics, but it's unclear if it's aimed to be a gaming laptop or a powerful productivity notebook.

Or you can eschew the graphics altogether for something lighter. You can add various keyboards and numpad options, including an RGB macropad, and you can place the touchpad in multiple spots. This is, simply put, the most customizable laptop I've ever seen. What category it fits in is really based on the way you build it. 

But at $1,749 as tested you're getting into pricey territory — add $400 for the graphics, and even more for the various input modules and expansion cards, and you're spending as much as you would on some of the best gaming laptops.

The various input options, expansion choices, and graphics swaps make the Framework Laptop 16 not just its most customizable laptop, but also its most complicated. People familiar with the inner workings of PCs will do the swaps no problem, but I do think Framework is starting to hit a point where you do need a degree of expertise coming in.

That makes the Framework Laptop 16 an exciting experiment. It may not be the best performer for the price, but it offers a great screen, solid webcam, and the promise of future upgrades, as long as you're willing to pay the price and get in the weeds. 

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Andrew E. Freedman
Senior Editor

Andrew E. Freedman is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on laptops, desktops and gaming. He also keeps up with the latest news. A lover of all things gaming and tech, his previous work has shown up in Tom's Guide, Laptop Mag, Kotaku, PCMag and Complex, among others. Follow him on Threads @FreedmanAE and BlueSky @andrewfreedman.net. You can send him tips on Signal: andrewfreedman.01

  • Notton
    Why would you refer to it as a "Franken" laptop, when it's entirely composed of Framework parts?
    If I took the screen assembly from a Mac, and slapped it onto a Dell body, then I would consider that a Franken laptop.
    Reply
  • criticaloftom
    I second that; there are no third party parts for it (unless you class the non business entities such as the 3d printing mob) and it's focus is on recyclability of it's parts within it's own ecosystem.

    i find the title of the article misleading in a way that would disparage adoption for no good reason.
    We are in an global era that is meant to be tackling it's carbon footprint and to put forth a negative biast to a product that is meant to be taking a risky stance in trying to combat e-waste is unprofessional as a writer; irresponsible in respect to the serious problems the world faces; and not a good look for Toms Hardware.

    To call a laptop a frankenlaptop you would have to have one cobbled together from dead/defective parts, sourced by the end user; and made to work through unusual means (probably performing soldering/ or ghetto modding). Does the Framework laptop allow an end user to 'make' a frankenlaptop under such terms? No it does not.

    My old laptop was a franken laptop because i soldered an adapter with a dodgy plug bypassing the dodgy pin reciever in the laptop from what i could scrounge (thus creating a hybrid laptop amalgam); that is not the directive of the framework laptop, nor is it of such intent.
    The framework laptop is focused only on being able to have reusable parts.
    Reply
  • tamalero
    criticaloftom said:
    I second that; there are no third party parts for it (unless you class the non business entities such as the 3d printing mob) and it's focus is on recyclability of it's parts within it's own ecosystem.

    i find the title of the article misleading in a way that would disparage adoption for no good reason.
    We are in an global era that is meant to be tackling it's carbon footprint and to put forth a negative biast to a product that is meant to be taking a risky stance in trying to combat e-waste is unprofessional as a writer; irresponsible in respect to the serious problems the world faces; and not a good look for Toms Hardware.

    To call a laptop a frankenlaptop you would have to have one cobbled together from dead/defective parts, sourced by the end user; and made to work through unusual means (probably performing soldering/ or ghetto modding). Does the Framework laptop allow an end user to 'make' a frankenlaptop under such terms? No it does not.

    My old laptop was a franken laptop because i soldered an adapter with a dodgy plug bypassing the dodgy pin reciever in the laptop from what i could scrounge (thus creating a hybrid laptop amalgam); that is not the directive of the framework laptop, nor is it of such intent.
    The framework laptop is focused only on being able to have reusable parts.
    The performance claims based on price are also hilarious.
    You might lose a few % of performance
    but you gain the change of just changing one part or "slot" from the laptop that you need to gain an upgrade.
    Meanwhile, to get an upgrade, you might have to buy a whole entire new laptop if you with the competition.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    I think the DIY 16" could be a good long term value depending on how things go with the graphics port. After seeing how much money external graphics cost for NUC style PCs $400 for a 7700S doesn't really seem that bad (it's about the same perf as the 7600M XT which is being used for some of the docks and costs over $200 more).

    Even without the graphics the DIY version isn't too bad a deal as long as you know what you're doing. I don't think they're quite there with the pre-built though the pricing isn't absurd and if you had long term plans I could see the potential.
    Reply
  • scottslayer
    Odd that the Tom's Guide review score is 4.5 stars.
    Also odd is that every other review seems to be more favorable.
    Reply
  • tamalero
    scottslayer said:
    Odd that the Tom's Guide review score is 4.5 stars.
    Also odd is that every other review seems to be more favorable.
    Well, its an all AMD piece so...
    You know how much they love intel and Nvidia.
    Reply