Razer Blade 16 review: Pricey, thin RTX 5090 laptop

RTX 5090 meets AMD's 28W Ryzen CPU.

Razer Blade 16
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The Razer Blade 16 is a thin RTX 5090 laptop with a bright screen and tons of ports, but it's extremely pricey and the drivers felt unfinished on our test unit.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Solid, thin design

  • +

    Bright, vivid screen

  • +

    Good battery life for a gaming laptop

  • +

    Lots of ports

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Very expensive

  • -

    Touchpad feels cheap

  • -

    Borderlands 3 benchmark wouldn't run

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Recent updates

Editor's Note 5/5/2025: We initially published this review without a score, as driver issues prevented us from running multiple test games. With recent driver updates affecting all RTX 50-series laptops, we were able to more thoroughly test the Razer Blade 16 and gave it a score.

When I picture the most powerful of the best gaming laptops, I think of behemoths with thick chassis and loud cooling systems. But the Razer Blade 16 (starts at $2,999.99, $4,499.99 as tested) paints a vision of a different world, where the most powerful laptop GPU, the RTX 5090, can fit in a chassis that’s just 0.69 inches at its thickest point.

Razer delivers a lot for the premium price (as it should) including a gorgeous display, solid battery life, and lots of ports. But the 28 W AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor makes for some tradeoffs, especially on CPU-bound games, and Nvidia still needs to do some work on its RTX 50-series "Blackwell" drivers to make this system perform as well as it should.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Andrew E. Freedman
Senior Editor

Andrew E. Freedman is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on laptops, desktops and gaming. He also keeps up with the latest news. A lover of all things gaming and tech, his previous work has shown up in Tom's Guide, Laptop Mag, Kotaku, PCMag and Complex, among others. Follow him on Threads @FreedmanAE and BlueSky @andrewfreedman.net. You can send him tips on Signal: andrewfreedman.01

  • kyzarvs
    Toms can happily shrug off the bonkers pricing of GPU's and then complain all through the article about the price of this laptop?

    Put it this way, not sure you are being part of the solution...
    Reply
  • cknobman
    Pay more for less.......great strategy.

    Having a "5090" mean jack diddly if it cant perform even close to its potential.
    Reply
  • Notton
    kyzarvs said:
    Toms can happily shrug off the bonkers pricing of GPU's and then complain all through the article about the price of this laptop?

    Put it this way, not sure you are being part of the solution...
    Razer laptops have always commanded a premium price for premium features, but not always premium build quality.
    So, like, IDK what you are expecting?
    it's a Razer, it's got Razer Tax, similar to RoG tax, except more.

    (by build quality, I mean it breaks down after 1~2 years)
    Reply
  • kyzarvs
    Notton said:
    Razer laptops have always commanded a premium price for premium features, but not always premium build quality.
    So, like, IDK what you are expecting?
    it's a Razer, it's got Razer Tax, similar to RoG tax, except more.

    (by build quality, I mean it breaks down after 1~2 years)
    Yeah - I was making the larger point on what Toms does / doesn't call out - you are right to bring it back to the laptop itself of course. I don't have a huge amount of Razer kit, but what I have seen hasn't been awesome in build quality.
    Reply
  • watzupken
    The only thing that makes this attractive is the lower power Ryzen CPU as compared to those power hungry Intel Raptor Lakes from last generation. If given a choice, I would just go with a Ryzen CPU + RTX 4090 combo instead of this RTX 5090 that cost more, but not going to be substantially faster.
    Reply
  • watzupken
    kyzarvs said:
    Toms can happily shrug off the bonkers pricing of GPU's and then complain all through the article about the price of this laptop?

    Put it this way, not sure you are being part of the solution...
    I feel what Tom's is expressing is exactly how most gamer feel. I mean even if you don't feel that way and willing to buy inflated GPUs that barely move the performance needle, I think it is still factual that the price to performance seems to have gotten worst for Nvidia cards.
    Reply
  • gg83
    kyzarvs said:
    Yeah - I was making the larger point on what Toms does / doesn't call out - you are right to bring it back to the laptop itself of course. I don't have a huge amount of Razer kit, but what I have seen hasn't been awesome in build quality.
    I have only used Razer peripherals since 1999. The quality is great and the lighting is unmatched imo. On sale they are the best, msrp is definitely too expensive. You won't find a better laptop with the same features for a cheaper price. Slim, amazing screen, keyboard, and RGB. Alienware charges more for less.
    Reply