Gigabyte Aorus CO49DQ OLED gaming monitor review: Tremendous color and contrast

49-inch 32:9 OLED display with an 1800R curve, 5120x1440 DQHD resolution, 144 Hz, Adaptive-Sync, HDR400 and wide gamut color.

Reviews
By
published
Aorus CO49DQ
Editor's Choice
(Image: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

I’ve been reviewing a lot of OLED monitors lately and I confess that I’m struggling to find much difference between them. They all have amazing contrast, accurate and saturated color, and superlative gaming performance. Truly, the only question is, what size works best? The answer depends, of course, on your environment and intended use. If you are one to run two or three screens, a 49-inch 32:9 monitor makes perfect sense. With DQHD 5120x1440 resolution, you get the same pixel density as a 27-inch 16:9 QHD monitor. That is still the sweet spot for performance, where you can get high frame rates without an expensive video card. The total pixel count is lower than Ultra HD. And if you have the room for a four-foot-wide monitor, why not make it an OLED?

(Image credit: Gigabyte)

The CO49DQ competes well with others in its size and resolution class. All the 49ers I’ve reviewed are close in brightness, color accuracy, color saturation and gaming feel. The only thing I would change is the 144 Hz refresh rate. Though it has very low input lag, there is a bit of motion blur. But buying a 240 Hz 49-inch monitor like the Samsung OLED G9 will cost you an extra $200 over the Aorus’ price of $1,000. Having played games on both monitors, I found the difference in feel to be minute. The CO49DQ has almost 20% more color volume, which is something you can plainly see. It’s the most colorful OLED I’ve reviewed to date.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

If you have the space and the budget, a 49-inch 32:9 OLED is compelling. It replaces two 27-inch 16:9 QHD screens and eliminates the dividing line. It’s curved enough for immersive play but not enough to distort things like spreadsheets or text documents. And it’s great for watching movies with decent built-in audio. The Gigabyte Aorus CO49DQ is a great addition to the category and definitely worth checking out.

MORE: Best Gaming Monitors

MORE: How We Test PC Monitors

MORE: How to Buy a PC Monitor

MORE: How to Choose the Best HDR Monitor

Christian Eberle
Christian Eberle
Contributing Editor

Christian Eberle is a Contributing Editor for Tom's Hardware US. He's a veteran reviewer of A/V equipment, specializing in monitors. Christian began his obsession with tech when he built his first PC in 1991, a 286 running DOS 3.0 at a blazing 12MHz. In 2006, he undertook training from the Imaging Science Foundation in video calibration and testing and thus started a passion for precise imaging that persists to this day. He is also a professional musician with a degree from the New England Conservatory as a classical bassoonist which he used to good effect as a performer with the West Point Army Band from 1987 to 2013. He enjoys watching movies and listening to high-end audio in his custom-built home theater and can be seen riding trails near his home on a race-ready ICE VTX recumbent trike. Christian enjoys the endless summer in Florida where he lives with his wife and Chihuahua and plays with orchestras around the state.

7 Comments Comment from the forums
  • parkerthon
    Really interesting, and finally a price that has me seriously considering try an oled monitor ultra wide. But being that my desktop is used for my job 95% of the time, which often requires Teams screen sharing of presentations, I’m trying to wrap my head around how that would work. Is there a way to virtually split my desktop for powerpoint presentation mode that throws slides on one screen and a presenters view on another? I use this a lot. I do see some third party utilities that might do this, but curious if anyone out there has experience with this.
    Reply
  • Giroro
    This is wider than the last-reviewed ASUS PG34WCDM, less expensive, and much less curved.
    It seems to have a lot going on.
    I would need to see the curve in person, because it is such a hard thing to convey through pictures.
    I wish best buy had better variety to their in-store displays.
    Reply
  • PEnns
    Seems like a really good monitor. But I have to ask: Does it really have to be curved? The size is (allegedly) the same, so why the curve? Curved might be more tolerable at 32", but 49" is a bit too much (IMHO).

    Or maybe the main consideration for some: More immersive? Well, maybe, but many will get the same experience from the same 49" monitor and most likely it will be less expensive!
    Reply
  • AkroZ
    PEnns said:
    Seems like a really good monitor. But I have to ask: Does it really have to be curved? The size is (allegedly) the same, so why the curve? Curved might be more tolerable at 32", but 49" is a bit too much (IMHO).

    Or maybe the main consideration for some: More immersive? Well, maybe, but many will get the same experience from the same 49" monitor and most likely it will be less expensive!
    There is many advantages to the curve.
    Firstly for this screen of 49 inch it reduce the width to 47 inch with better readability, your eyes need less distance to find the corners.
    On a flat screen the center is good but due to the angles of view the pixels becomes more and more deformed on the edges and smaller (from the viewer perspective), this also reduce the perceived lights making the corners darker.
    Those makes corners more difficult to read. Here it's a curved 1800R screen, if you place your eyes at 1,8 meter from screen then all pixels will remain squares everywhere horizontally (because it is not curved vertically) making the lighting consistent.
    But for that you need to be centered, so it's only for one person, for a presentation monitor or a TV it's better to be flat.

    About the cost of curving, OLED is a flexible surface by nature, it's mainly a choice of form for the rigid support and adapt the assembling chain. This will not really cost more materials. Customers are generally paying a premium fee but you can find some curved monitors at the same price than non-curved monitors.
    Reply
  • Notton
    can confirm. With 2x 27" side by side, I have to put them in a V shape to read stuff at the outer edges.
    Reply
  • TheHerald
    A 49" Super ultra wide monitor is not very practical, trust me, had one for 2 years.
    Reply
  • subspruce
    I can't imagine how I would even use all of that display, or even fit this on my desk, but your desk may be huge and you may need the equivalent of 2 25" monitors side-by-side for whatever you may be doing
    Reply