Version : 3.220Video Mode : 1024x768Video Quality : game defaultVsync = offBenchmark : real 60 second gamewith real three computer physics
Prey
Version : 1.3Video Mode : 1280x1024Video Quality : game defaultVsync = offBenchmark : THG-Demo
Audio
iTunes 7.2
Version : 7.1.1.5Audio CD "Terminator II SE", 53 minMP3 High Quality (160 kbps)
Lame MP3
Version 3.98 Beta 3 (05-22-2007)Audio CD "Terminator II SE", 53 minwave to mp3160 kbps
Video
Pinnacle Studio 11 Plus
Version : 11.0.0.5082Encoding and Transition RenderingPrivate MPEG2-Cam-MovieVideo : 720 x 480 Pixel, NTSC, 6000 kbits/secAudio : MPEG Layer 2, 224 kbits/sec 16 Bit, Stereo 48 kHzFile Type : MPEG-2 (DVD Compatible)
TMPEG
Version : 4.2.10.211import file : Terminator 2 SE DVD (720x576, 16:9) 2 MinutesDolby Digital, 48000 Hz, 6-Kanal, EnglishAdvanced Acoustic Engine MP3 Encoder (160 kbps)
DivX
Version : 6.6.1- Main Menu -Profile : Home Theater Profile (720 x 576)1-pass, 780 kbit/s- Codec Menu -Encoding mode : Insane QualityEnhanced multithreading
XviD
Version : 1.1.2 (01/11/2006)Target quantizer : 1.00 (maximum quality)
Clone DVD 2
Version : 2.908DVD "Terminator II SE" (English version)Transcoding from DVD-9 to DVD-4.7Audio : English Dolby AC-3/6 (surround) - DTSSubtitle : no
its architecture it fine but
it is clock speed the phenom lacks. if amd can just bump its speed up to around 3ghz-3.6ghz then it would make good competition towards faster intels. i can conclude from this benchmark that if you buy an phenom 9850 and clock it around 3ghz you have much more horse power then you would have with an athlon x2 6000+ however some benchmarks might tell you something else it makes sence if you use 1066mhz memory or just 800mhz mem
i wish tom's would update this topic with new benchmarks on the amd phenom 9850be. i'd like to know if it's more stable now that the "nasty bug" has been remedied with the march 2008 product line refresh.
Well this review says its not much more performance. I'm upgrading from 939 and actually thinking of getting the $60 AMD Athlon 64 X2 7750 (AM2+) and OC it to at least 3ghz and run 1066 memory. I'd rather save the money for the future rather than have a few extra FPS.
Intel's core i7 really is clearly the better processor with more headroom, but AMD has always had them in the price to performance ratio department. AMD isn't going away and perhaps they can make a better processor like when Athlon 64 came out or at least close the gap and let their price to performance ratio carry them the rest of the way. (http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/overclock-phenom-ii,2119.html)