ASRock TRX40 Creator Review: a Threadripper Value?

This board has faster networking and a better slot configuration than pricier models.

(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

A good overall value with excellent network capabilities, the $460 TRX40 Creator is almost perfectly designed to host a 32-core Threadripper CPU and four double-slot expansion cards.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Good stability

  • +

    10GbE, 2.5GbE & 2.4Gbps Wi-Fi

  • +

    Includes 20Gbps USB Type-C 2x2 port

  • +

    About $40 cheaper than compared models

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Small voltage regulator

  • -

    Tall voltage regulator cooler limits case selection when using top-mounted radiators

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Some of us may have forgotten that ATX cases have seven slots, due to the simple fact that most motherboard don’t provision the top slot location for an expansion card. Sure, we’ve seen some x1 slots up there, but builders typically ignore those. 

Crowding around the CPU socket has typically been the reason for that omission, but looking back a few years to four-way graphics configurations, we remember plenty of boards designed to work around that issue. Back then, there were also many more eight-slot cases, but that’s tangential to the fact that ASRock found such a workaround for the design of its TRX40 Creator board, designed for AMD's latest Threadripper 3000 CPUs.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Thomas Soderstrom is a Senior Staff Editor at Tom's Hardware US. He tests and reviews cases, cooling, memory and motherboards.
  • Keith Myers
    This board is absolutely at the top of my short list. Allows 4 double wide gpus for distributed computing and is inexpensive in comparison to all the other TRX40 boards that only allow 3 cards at max.

    This board and a 3960X will replace my aging Xeon four card host which is severely lacking in the math compute performance compared to Ryzen and Threadripper.
    Reply
  • Crashman
    Keith Myers said:
    This board is absolutely at the top of my short list. Allows 4 double wide gpus for distributed computing and is inexpensive in comparison to all the other TRX40 boards that only allow 3 cards at max.

    This board and a 3960X will replace my aging Xeon four card host which is severely lacking in the math compute performance compared to Ryzen and Threadripper.
    This is exactly the type of response I was hoping to hear.
    Reply
  • beliberdah
    what is "math compute " used for?
    Reply
  • timvanhelsdingen
    Amazing looking board, ticks all the boxes while costing less.
    Oh and I can clear up the 4 gpu for you pretty easily, as I'll be running it with 4 gpu's:
    VFX industry is moving towards GPU rendering and a lot of people will max out their boxes with 4 gpu's to have faster rendertime. Renderengines such as Redshift, Octane, Arnold, Vray, Renderman, all have gpu capabilities in some form or are build around gpu rendering.
    Reply
  • noko
    I am very impressed with this board. Does give a lot of punch for features. A type C connector for front panel, USB 2 for front panel and USB 3.2 (My case has all three of those connectors) other boards lack type C or USB 2. Back panel is weak for USB's but there are plenty of connectors to add to them. Q code, reset and power button. Clear CMOS and Flash button on back.

    No RGB on the board itself except headers - I call that a very cool feature!

    There is also a thing called PCIe extenders or cables - even PCIe4x ones now for using those slots anyway you want.

    VRMs are one of the weakest but still overkill for 32 cores and down and for stock settings which are almost as fast as the best OC scores. I would most likely use stock settings to maximize any boost frequency for gaming besides more productive type work.

    Great review.
    Reply