Asus ROG Swift PG27UQ 4K Gaming Monitor Review: $2,000 & Worth Every Penny

Brightness & Contrast

To read about our monitor tests in-depth, check out Display Testing Explained: How We Test Monitors and TVs. We cover brightness and contrast testing on page two. 

Loading...

Uncalibrated – Maximum Backlight Level

There are few monitors that perform in the PG27UQ’s class, but we picked a few HDR and high-contrast models for today’s comparisons. The HDR roster includes BenQ’s EX3501R, Samsung’s C49HG90 and LG’s 34WK650. The non-HDR squad consists of AOC’s AG322QCX and MSI’s Optix MAG24C, and both of these are VA-based with extended color gamuts.

We started our testing by measuring the PG27UQ with its Variable Backlight feature turned off. That showed us that the panel’s native performance is on par with a typical IPS part. It topped out at 310.6 nits with a reasonable 0.3 nit black level and a contrast ratio of 1062.8:1.

When we turned Variable Backlight on, black levels dipped to an extreme low of about .02 nits. We’re approaching plasma territory here. Meanwhile, the contrast ratio shot up to 17,131.3:1. Lest you think this meant sacrificing detail for clipping, fret not. Gamma tracked perfectly, and we didn’t lose detail in either shadow or highlight areas. This is the best SDR performance we’ve ever measured short of a plasma television.

Uncalibrated – Minimum Backlight Level

When the backlight slider is set to its minimum setting, the PG27UQ puts out a fairly impractical 23 nits. For a more-comfortable 50 nits, we recommend setting it to 11. Contrast remained consistent at 1,028.1:1. When we used Variable Backlight at this low brightness level, blacks were extremely deep.

The most the backlight can be reduced is to an extremely dim 23 nits. For a more useful 50 nits, we set the brightness control to 11, and contrast remained consistent at 1,028.1:1. When we used Variable Backlight at this low brightness level, blacks were extremely deep.

After Calibration to 200 nits

Calibrating to 200 nits of brightness did not hurt contrast. The PG27UQ still delivered a contrast ratio of 1,042.9:1 and a solid 0.2 nits black luminance.

HDR Brightness & Contrast

This is what we all came to see, and after taking our measurements, we couldn’t wait to publish the results.

The PG27UQ topped the Dell UP2817Q in HDR brightness with an impressive 1,156 nits. But look at the contrast result. Thanks to an amazingly low black level, we measured 61,843.6:1 contrast. To say that’s nuts would be an understatement. We reached this number by measuring a 10 percent window pattern, meaning the window takes up only 10 percent of the screen.

Upon measuring a full-field pattern, brightness dropped to 667 nits and contrast was 35,609.8:1. With any full-array panel, contrast is largely dependent on content and how well its local dimming control is implemented.

ANSI Contrast Ratio

We measured intra-image contrast in SDR mode. Turning on the Variable Backlight added nearly 60 percent to the result, a worthwhile gain.

MORE: Best Gaming Monitors

MORE: How We Test Monitors

MORE: All Monitor Content

14 comments
    Your comment
  • hixbot
    What about the fan noise?
  • mlee 2500
    Won't catch me buying a monitor with a fan inside. I don't care how great it is otherwise. Not too mention 4K at 27" is kind of a pointless waste of the GPU resources you use to drive it. Even at 28" I find my XB280HK too small for most games at 4K...it just makes all the hours that game developers and artists put into their product become pointless when the details are too small to notice.

    I've come to the conclusion that 30" is probably the sweet spot of not extending too far beyond your peripheral vision while still being large enough to make 4K worthwhile (I had a 31" LG and it was *too* big, IMHO). Of course this all assumes a rational 16:9 aspect ration. Don't even get me started on these super wide models with a paltry 1440 vertical. Seems like a neck injury waiting to happen.
  • jonhart
    That's not how net worth works.
  • Posty351
    27 inches?? Waste of space if not 32" or bigger.
  • jas1nt
    Just buy it.

    Ironically, you'd need an RTX 2080 Ti too.

    JUST BUY IT
  • AlistairAB
    Get the non-HDR version about to be released. Only $1300 instead.
  • milkod2001
    This is something i was waiting for ages. Just one thing. I'm not 13years old any more, wish i was :). I don't need that stupid holographic or RGB lighting at the back. Just regular adjustable stand. I also don't need HDR, it's immature gimmick at the moment. I also want 32'' 4k version. 27''4k is a joke. Also price should be more down to earth $1200-1500. Gonna wait a little bit more i guess.
  • milkod2001
    Go ahead and read reviews of actual owners on newegg. There is a loud fan included. This is not acceptable at this price.
  • Joe Black
    Best thing about it... It's not curved. Amiright?
  • moogleslam
    @Joe Black - I wouldn't call that the best thing about it, but sure, there isn't much need for a 16:9 27" to be curved. Not sure if you're against curved in general, but there's absolutely a place for it. a 21:9 34" or a 32:9 49" absolutely has to be curved.
  • phobicsq
    Only 27 inches, lame. At least 34 and for 2k, crazy.
  • Giroro
    4k is too much resolution in a 27 inch monitor
  • TMRichard
    The price of this in New Zealand is at or over $4,000 at most places. I waited for these monitors for a very long time, but in the end I just bought an AOC AGON AG271UG. I would love to have 120hz and HDR but I can't justify *quadrupling* the price for it!
  • ceberle
    The fan noise just wasn't an issue during my review. Unless there is no ambient noise whatsoever, the fan is silent when running. A quiet PC will easily drown it out. The sound from a game will drown it out.

    The price is certainly high but it provides a gaming experience like no other screen I've reviewed.

    -Christian-