Page 1:Profiting From A Pricier Processor
Page 2:CPU And Cooler
Page 3:Motherboard And Memory
Page 4:Graphics Card And Hard Drive
Page 5:Case, Power Supply, And Optical Drive
Page 6:Assembly And Overclocking
Page 7:Test System Configuration And Benchmarks
Page 8:Benchmark Results: Crysis And Just Cause 2
Page 9:Benchmark Results: F1 2010 And Metro 2033
Page 10:Benchmark Results: Audio And Video
Page 11:Benchmark Results: Productivity
Page 12:Benchmark Results: Synthetics
Page 13:Power Consumption And Temperatures
Page 14:Can Core i5-2400 Justify Its Higher Cost?
Power Consumption And Temperatures
Both of these systems are powered by Antec EarthWatts 430 W units with 80 PLUS Bronze efficiency ratings, and we test them with their respective power saving features enabled.
In order to reach our overclocking ambitions, however, we had to disable Cool’n’Quiet on the September PC.
September’s overclocking efforts yielded a considerable amount of extra performance from the Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition at the cost of very little added power consumption. Even still, the Core i5's power use is miserly in comparison.
The performance of Intel’s bundled cooler does not look nearly as impressive as AMD’s heat pipe-equipped solution, even though it dissipates a lot less heat from the 32 nm Sandy Bridge processor.
Intel's advantage is that its processor fan is practically inaudible outside the enclosure, rotating at less than one-third the speed of AMD’s 6000+ RPM screamer (which is decidedly audible).
- Profiting From A Pricier Processor
- CPU And Cooler
- Motherboard And Memory
- Graphics Card And Hard Drive
- Case, Power Supply, And Optical Drive
- Assembly And Overclocking
- Test System Configuration And Benchmarks
- Benchmark Results: Crysis And Just Cause 2
- Benchmark Results: F1 2010 And Metro 2033
- Benchmark Results: Audio And Video
- Benchmark Results: Productivity
- Benchmark Results: Synthetics
- Power Consumption And Temperatures
- Can Core i5-2400 Justify Its Higher Cost?