Results: CPU Benchmarks
So, we know this game is not graphics-bound on most 3D solutions. Does it respond to differences in CPU performance, though? In order to check, we maintained our highest detail settings and dropped the resolution to 1680x1050.
The only processor that drops below 50 FPS is the dual-core Athlon II X2 260, and even then we see a frame rate that doesn't dip under 35 FPS. If you're worried about slower CPUs, remember that our mobile AMD A10-4600M runs at 2.3 GHz, and that mobile Core i5-3210M operates at 2.5 GHz. Both chips managed more than 30 FPS in our lowest-detail benchmark leveraging on-board graphics.
Clearly, Intel has the advantage, though a quad-core AMD CPU is still fast enough for smooth frame rates in Dota 2. I personally wouldn't worry about choppy frame rates unless I was still stuck with a dual-core Athlon or Phenom running at less than 2.5 GHz. On the other hand, Intel's dual-core Sandy Bridge-based Pentium doesn't have a problem chewing through this title's highest-detail setting.
I'm so glad they keep the game mechanic and the system requirement low...
the one problems i had is no near server in my country, and the internet connection is quite bad...
I'm wonder if this game is playable on LAN or private/local server?
and desktop core i3 is keeping up with fx8350 and then beats it in avg fps? so much for moar cores. the time has come again to recommend core i3 over fx!! relax c.a.l.f., i am kidding, it's not 2011 anymore. :P
i think..... this is the second multiplayer game since the guild wars 2 where core i3 has taken a lead.
kidding aside, could you test core i5 3570k or 3470 (at stock) instead of core i5 3550, the 3570k is selling for $220 at newegg, i5 3550 is $225 and fx8350 is $200(excl. shipping). i5 3470 is selling for $200 and with a mobo like asus z77-v lx, i think it can hit 4 ghz with multicore turbo enabled.
no one is going to rage, its a low requirement game as for cpu, all they needed to test was the general core difference. if your quad core intel cpu is faster than the tested cpu, then just add a few fps to the tested results +/- irregularities with systems and testing situations. the cpus chosen were just a bunch of cpus of different core count and architectures to gather data from modernish cpus for the game. No one is really going to argue against something like a 4.5 3570k being better than like a i5-3470 at max turbo clock. Its generally accepted that clocks in the same architecture will make it run better.