What Does It Take To Turn The PC Into A Hi-Fi Audio Platform?
Most hi-fi audio is stored in digital form. With advancements in lossless compression, bit-perfect ripping/streaming, HD audio formats, multi-terabyte storage, and PC-friendly DACs, has the PC earned a place among high-end audio gear? At what price point?
Results: Dragonborn / Jeremy Soule
Track notes
If you're reading this page and you've never played Skyrim, then stop reading. Now. Go play Skyrim. One hundred or 200 game-hours later, you'll appreciate the remainder of this page...
...or will you? In the game's encoded format (a lossy, compressed, WMA-related format with an .xwm extension), Skyrim's soundtrack is pretty outstanding. But the official soundtrack on CD has a special degree of immersiveness that goes beyond the in-game music (or so my brain seems to think).
So, after you put in your game time, go buy Skyrim's soundtrack, spend some more time just listening to that, and after you catch yourself singing out Dovahkiin! with those 90 voices, you will really appreciate the rest of this page.
The Dragonborn track itself is a Red Book-standard 16-bit, 44.1 kHz file. It is remarkable because of its deep vocals and bass-heaviness, intermixed with high treble female vocals that create an extreme sonic contrast.
Test results (Listener A)
Run | Actual Device | Guess device | Correct / Incorrect |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Benchmark DAC2 HGC | Benchmark DAC2 HGC or JDS Labs O2+ODAC (uncertain) | (Directionally) Correct |
2 | Realtek ALC889* | Realtek ALC889 (uncertain) | Correct* |
3 | Realtek ALC889* | Benchmark DAC2 HGC or JDS Labs O2+ODAC (uncertain) | Not Correct* |
4 | Asus Xonar Essence STX | Asus Xonar Essence STX (uncertain) | Correct |
5 | Benchmark DAC2 HGC | Benchmark DAC2 HGC or JDS Labs O2+ODAC (uncertain) | (Directionally) Correct |
6 | JDS Labs O2+ODAC | Asus Xonar Essence STX (uncertain) | Not Correct |
7 | JDS Labs O2+ODAC | Realtek ALC889 (highly uncertain) | Not Correct |
8 | Asus Xonar Essence STX | Benchmark DAC2 HGC or JDS Labs O2+ODAC (uncertain) | Not Correct |
Listener A's comments:
As we start our blind tests, I'm not really sure what exactly to listen for. Based on the results above, obviously for an untrained ear it is hard to tell most devices apart. I'm really curious to see if I improve as I listen to more content. From my notes, it seems that the device I subjectively preferred was what turned out to be Asus' Xonar Essence STX (runs four and eight). That is surprising to me. I'm curious to see if that continues to hold true.
*: Tests of the Realtek ALC889 codec marked with an asterisk had a volume level calibration issue that was corrected later. We kept the results in for the sake of transparency, although they should not be considered representative of an actual ability to distinguish the ALC889 from the other devices being tested.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Results: Dragonborn / Jeremy Soule
Prev Page Test Setup: The Blind Testing Process Next Page Results: Soothe My Soul / Depeche Mode-
SuckRaven Bravo ! Awesome, and a very thorough review. Even though as you mention, audio gear is not usually the forté/emphasis of the reviews here, it's refreshing to have someone at least try to cut through the (more often-than-not) overpriced arena of bullshit that is the field of "high-end" audio. I applaud the review, and the effort. Keep up the good work. More please.Reply -
PudgyChicken Just wondering, why not test a Creative X-Fi Titanium HD or something like that alongside the ASUS Xonar? It would be interesting to see some of the differences between different PCIe sound cards in this matchup. However I understand that what you were really going for was showing the difference between price point and form factor at the same time, so perhaps not testing two PCIe cards makes sense.Reply -
kitsunestarwind The biggest thing I have found for the PC is no matter how good your DAC is , if your speakers and AMP are crap, then it will never sound better.People spend big money on DAC's and forget that you need a high Quality amp with very very low THD (total harmonic distortions) and a very good set of Full Range speakers with high sensitivity if you want good sound, instead of crappy (albeit expensive) computer speakers especially sets with a sub.Reply -
maestro0428 Wonderful article! I love listening to music and do so mostly at my PCs. I try to set up systems where audio is important in component selection. Although we all love drooling over expensive equipment, many times it is not all that necessary for an amazing experience. I'd love to see more! Including smaller, studio speakers as I believe that speakers/headphones are the most important part of the equation. Keep up the great work!Reply -
Someone Somewhere Agree totally with this. It always annoys me when people say they're spending over $100 on a sound card, especially when it turns out that they're using Optical out, and the whole thing is basically moot.I now have a nice source to link to.Reply -
1zacster The thing is you can't just pick up two sets of good headphones, try them on different DACs/AMPs and expect to hear major differences, it takes longer than 5 minutes for your ears to adjust to newer headphones and for the differences to actually show. This is like taking food from Left Bank and then bringing in a bunch of hobos and asking them tel tell the differences between the foods.Reply -
dogman-x I use an optical cable from my PC to a home theatre receiver. With this setup, stereo CD audio content is sent as raw PCM to the receiver, not compressed into DD or DTS. These days you can buy a very good quality home theatre receiver for less than $200. Audio quality is outstanding.Reply -
Memnarchon I would love to see ALC1150 in these tests too, since its widely used at most Z87 mobos.Reply