3D Mark 2001: High Polygon Count
In this test, the "missing" two vertex shaders really hurt the 9600 PRO, resulting in lower polygon throughput.
3D Mark 2001: Vertex Shader Speed
Interestingly, the lower polygon performance of the 9600 PRO compared to the 9500 is not as pronounced in the 3DMark 2001 vertex shader test. The fact that the vanilla 9500 scores higher than the PRO version can be attributed to our review sample's higher clock speeds.
3D Mark 2001: Pixel Shader Speed
The 9600 PRO offers solid performance here. It can almost close the gap to the 9500 PRO, and clearly outpaces the FX 5600.
3D Mark 2001: Adv. Pixel Shader Speed
It remains unclear why both FX cards fall this far behind in this test, since they both support PS 1.4 in hardware, thanks to DX9 support. It's worth noting that the 9600 PRO once again trails the 9500 PRO by a wide margin.
Current page: 3D Mark 2001: High Polygon CountPrev Page 3D Mark 2001: Game 4 Nature Next Page 3D Mark 2003: Standard 1024x768
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.