Intel’s 24-Core, 14-Drive Modular Server Reviewed

Name: Intel’s 24-Core, 14-Drive Modular Server Reviewed
Author: Julio Urquidi

by Julio Urquidi January 30, 2009 at 12:00 AM

Ed: Julio Urquidi designs and manages Windows and Linux servers at a large medical center.

Let's say you're part of a small company that has identified a satellite office with some extra space, and you are tasked to set up a couple of servers that would be low maintenance, reliable, and compact. Perhaps, you also need the flexibility to add a couple more servers, but are restricted by power requirements and hardware costs. You might also work for a small- or medium-sized business that needs to add a system that provides redundancy and easy-to-use administrative tools that won’t kill your budget.

The Intel MFSYS25 Modular Server System may be the server solution you are looking for.

The MFSYS25 can hold six servers and a built in SAN; all in a single package.

The MFSYS25 is a flexible chassis-based system that has room for six server-like compute modules. It offers networking with an Ethernet switch module and includes a built-in SAN (storage area network) that holds 14 2.5” SAS drives and can be shared between server modules. The chassis and its components are all managed through a Web-enabled administration tool. Overall, the MFSYS25 is designed to provide a remotely managed environment that is robust and stable with redundant power, storage, and cooling for up to six servers.

Using Intel’s Multi-Flex architecture, the rack-based MFSYS25 puts a lot of power into a relatively small server footprint for small- to medium-sized businesses and remote offices. Using 4 GB DIMMs, the total memory capacity can reach up to 192 GB of RAM if you pack each of the six available Compute Modules with 32 GB of memory. The system is uniquely flexible, as it enables easy administration in setting up storage pools within the MFSYS25’s SAN. In turn, this allows the administrator to assign the disks in these pools to the compute modules in multiple options of RAID configurations. The system supports up to 12 dual-core and quad-core Xeon processors, and up to two processors per server module, giving the MFSYS25 plenty of horsepower to run today’s apps.

Note: The MFSYS25 is one of two Intel modular servers. The other modular server in the line, called the MFSYS35, is different in that is can hold six 3.5” SATA or SAS drives.

Our demo system consisted of the following;

One MFSYS25 chassis
Three MFS5000SI compute modules,
One Ethernet switch module
One management module
One storage controller module
14 2.5" SAS hard drives
Three power supply modules (fourth Power Supply not used)
Two main cooling modules
One I/O cooling module

Summary

About the author

Julio Urquidi

Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the US Reviews comments forum about this subject

Title
Title
Subject

This thread is closed for comments

39 comments

Comment from the forums

Your comment

kevikom

This is not a new concept. HP & IBM already have Blade servers. HP has one that is 6U and is modular. You can put up to 64 cores in it. Maybe Tom's could compare all of the blade chassis.
kevikom

Also I did not see any pricing on this. Did i miss it somewhere???
sepuko

Are the blades in IBM's and HP's solutions having to carry hard drives to operate? Or are you talking of certain model or what are you talking about anyway I'm lost in your general comparison. "They are not new cause those guys have had something similar/the concept is old."
Anonymous

Why isn't the poor network performance addressed as a con? No GigE interface should be producing results at FastE levels, ever.
nukemaster

So, When you gonna start folding on it

Did you contact Intel about that network thing. There network cards are normally top end. That has to be a bug.

You should have tried to render 3d images on it. It should be able to flex some muscles there.
MonsterCookie

Now frankly, this is NOT a computational server, and i would bet 30% of the price of this thing, that the product will be way overpriced and one could buid the same thing from normal 1U servers, like Supermicro 1U Twin.
The nodes themselves are fine, because the CPU-s are fast. The problem is the build in Gigabit LAN, which is jut too slow (neither the troughput nor the latency of the GLan was not ment for these pourposes).
In a real cumputational server the CPU-s should be directly interconnected with something like Hyper-Transport, or the separate nodes should communicate trough build-in Infiniband cards. The MINIMUM nowadays for a computational cluster would be 10G LAN buid in, and some software tool which can reduce the TCP/IP overhead and decrease the latency.
Anonymous

less its a typo the bench marked older AMD opterons. the AMD opteron 200s are based off the 939 socket(i think) which is ddr1 ecc. so no way would it stack up to the intel.
Anonymous

The server could be used as a Oracle RAC cluster. But as noted you really want better interconnects than 1gb Ethernet. And I suspect from the setup it makes a fare VM engine.
ghyatt

I priced a full chassis out for a client, and it was under 20k...
navvara

It can't be under 20K.

I reallty want to know what the price of this server is.
Anonymous

Actually it is under $20k for a fully confgured system with 6 blades - i priced it up online. You can push it a bit higher than this if you go for very high end memory (16GB+) and top bin processors but for most the fully loaded config would come in around $20k. It's very well priced.
kittle

The chassis for your client was under 20k... np

but to get one IDENTICAL to what was tested in this article - whats that cost? I would think "price as tested" would be a standard data point.

Also - the disk i/o graphs are way to small to read without a lot of extra mouse clicks, and even then i get "error on page" when trying to see the full rez version. Makes all that work you spent gathering the disk benchmarks rather useless if people cant read them.
Anonymous

the price as tested in the article is way less than $20k. they only had 3 compute modules and non redundant SAN or Switch. Their configuration would cost around $15k - seriously just go and price it up online - search MFSSYS25 and MFS5000SI
asburye

I have one sitting here on my desk with 6 compute modules, 2 Ethernet switches, 2 Controller modules, 4 power supplies, and 14-143GB/10k SAS drives. The 6 compute modules all have 16GB RAM, 2-Xeon 5420's each and 4 of them have the extra HBA card as well, our price was < $25,000 with everything including shipping and tax. The Shared LUN Key is about $400. We bought ours about 2 months ago.
Shadow703793

nukemasterSo, When you gonna start folding on it Did you contact Intel about that network thing. There network cards are normally top end. That has to be a bug.You should have tried to render 3d images on it. It should be able to flex some muscles there.

Nahhh... you don't run F@H on CPUs any more
You run it on GPUs! CUDA FTW! :P
nukemaster

yeah, thats true. CUDA kills in folding.
Anonymous

Thanks for the comments/suggestions/questions everyone. Your input is appreciated and will be applied to future reviews.

We're addressing the issue with the network test results. - julio
Area51

This is the only solution that I can think of that has the integrated SAN solution. None of the OEM's (Dell, HP, IBM) can do that in their solution as of yet. Also if you configure the CPU's with L5430's this becomes the perfect VMware box.
As far as power switch... Remember that in a datacenter enviornment you do not turn off the chassis. there is less chance of accidental shutdown if there is no power switch on the main circuit. This is 6 servers network switch, and a SAn solution in-one you do not want a kill switch. that is why no OEM ever puts a power switch in thier blade solution Chassis.
Anonymous

Hi folks. We're re-running the network test this weekend. Stay-tune for the update. - julio
MonsterCookie

I went over the review/test, and as far as i understood in this system there is only a single GLAN switch.
Besides, the individual nodes do not have their own HDD, but a NAS instead.

This is particularly bad, because the disk-I/O is also handled by this poor LAN switch.
One should use at least two switches: one for internode communication, and the other for NFS and so on.

Second point: if those prices which i have seen in the forum are right, than 20k$ is equivalent to 15600Euros.
For that money i can buy from the company where we are buying our equipment from the same system build from Supermicro 1U Twins. For this price i even have Dual GLAN per node, and one Infiniband per node.
This system above could be called indeed a computational server, and the Intel system is just something like a custom made weakly coupled network of computers which is coming with a hefty price tag.
Of course one could argue that buying 3 Supermicro twins plus an Infiniband switch is not as neet looking as this Intel, but once it is in a rack, who cares?
I would not really would like to listen to this intel machine on my desk anyway, so that should be put in a nice rack as well.