Conclusion: A Good HTPC Option, But A High MSRP
In our final analysis, let’s consider average gaming performance across our benchmark suite at 1680x1050, the most common resolution for this class of card:
The Radeon HD 6670 performs a little better than AMD's 5670, and the GDDR5-equipped 6570 performs a little worse.
At the bottom of the stack, we see AMD's Radeon HD 5570 DDR3. For $60 online, this is a good baseline gaming card capable of handling 1280x1024 and sometimes 1680x1050, so long as detail settings are lowered. The GeForce GT 240 GDDR5 performs about 20% faster, but it's priced in the $80 range. That's about the same as the Radeon HD 5670—a card that doubles its performance increase. The only card in this review limited to DirectX 10, the GeForce GT 240 doesn’t have much going for it.
Next up is the new Radeon HD 6570. Equipped with GDDR5, it’s not quite as fast as the Radeon HD 5670. However, its $79 MSRP is very similar to the 5670’s online retail pricing. You could argue that the Radeon HD 6570 GDDR5 has better overclocking potential, but we can't be sure until we get our hands on actual retail samples, rather than cherry-picked reference cards. In any case, the older Radeon HD 5670 remains a viable option at $80. It's certainly not obsolete yet.
Although we didn't have one to test, a 512 MB DDR3-equipped Radeon HD 6570 could be a more interesting card. Frankly, we’re not sure that the GDDR5-equipped 6570 will have a significant retail presence, since manufacturers have been free to make a GDDR5 version of the 5570, but continue to keep it saddled with slower DDR3 memory. The Radeon HD 6570 could end up in the same situation, though only time will tell. A 512 MB DDR3-based card might not have shown better than the Radeon HD 5570 in game benchmarks, but at a lower price point, it would make a very compelling option for HTPCs. Assuming it can handle HD video in the same manner as the cards we've tested (and we all know what assumptions do), a Radeon HD 6570 with DDR3 could introduce compelling video playback for less than $80. That remains a guess until we see proof otherwise.
How about the premium Turks-based model, Radeon HD 6670? Performance is better than the Radeon HD 5670 to be sure. But the $99 MSRP is terribly close to the street price of powerful options like Radeon HD 5750 and GeForce GTS 450 (a card we've seen as low as $100 over the past few weeks). Prior to publishing, the cheapest GTS 450 we can find is $115. That just goes to show how volatile the graphics card market really is. A $99 Radeon HD 6670 is simply too expensive, particulalrly with the Radeon HD 5750 and GeForce GTS 450 priced a few dollars more.
Over time, the street price of AMD's Radeon HD 6670 will go down to the $80 level where it belongs, replacing the Radeon HD 5670. Remember, its MSRP was $99 at launch, too. For the latest in pricing, be sure to check our monthly Best Graphics Card For The Money column.
Current page: Conclusion: A Good HTPC Option, But A High MSRPPrev Page Power, Temperature, And Noise Benchmarks
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
price aside, i'm rather impressed with the 6670. sure the 5750 and gts 450 are more powerful, but nvidia's card just looks ridiculous in the power draw graph. being the fastest card without a pci-e connector is more than just a title, the 6670 will become the new go-to card for people with dells, hps, and ect looking to upgrade to discrete graphics(like the 4670 and 5670 before it).Reply
also, a 5670 can be found on newegg for $73 before rebate.
With $99 after MIR 5770s on newegg, the GTS450, 5750, and 6670 are all to expensive. I am most impressed that AMD has got this level of performance out ofReply
The card has great overclock:Reply
960Mhz+ / 5000+Mhz for the memory. A 21% increase in games (tpu review).
i used to play cod4 with a 3.0 ghz dual core and a radeon 4650 @ 1400x900 with good frame rates. and the whole pc only had a draw of 135 watts at the wall. this new 6670 is a kick @ss low power solution for most wanting to game on the semi cheap. kinda want one for my back up pc now.Reply
For $80, how can you beat a card that can overclock to 6670 speeds easily? And perform identically due to the same specs otherwise?Reply
^The 6570, is this card I am referring to.Reply
How much better is the 6570 than the 4550Reply
just wondering why we used a 1200w psu when most systems use only 10% of its capacity... i believe the power draw graphs are skewed due to lower efficiency at that load.
Another gr8 review just loved reading it.Reply
jestersagegreat review!just wondering why we used a 1200w psu when most systems use only 10% of its capacity... i believe the power draw graphs are skewed due to lower efficiency at that load.Reply
Its just standard practise to overkill all other components to make sure they don't cause weird results. Besides the absolute draw isn't important its how the cards compare with each other.