Page 1:Radeon HD 6970 And 6950 Arrive
Page 2:Building Cayman By Improving Cypress
Page 3:AMD Acknowledges That Geometry Matters
Page 4:Adding Value Through Anti-Aliasing, Eyefinity, And Video
Page 5:PowerTune: Changing The Way You Overclock
Page 6:Meet Radeon HD 6970 And Radeon HD 6950
Page 7:Test Setup And Benchmarks
Page 8:Benchmark Results: 3DMark Vantage (DX10)
Page 9:Benchmark Results: Metro 2033 (DX11)
Page 10:Benchmark Results: Lost Planet 2 (DX11)
Page 11:Benchmark Results: Aliens Vs. Predator (DX11)
Page 12:Benchmark Results: Battlefield: Bad Company 2 (DX11)
Page 13:Benchmark Results: DiRT 2 (DX11)
Page 14:Benchmark Results: Just Cause 2 (DX11)
Page 15:Multi-Card Scaling In 3DMark
Page 16:Multi-Card Scaling In Metro 2033
Page 17:Multi-Card Scaling In AvP
Page 18:Multi-Card Scaling In Battlefield: Bad Company 2
Page 19:Multi-Card Scaling In DiRT 2
Page 20:Multi-Card Scaling In Just Cause 2
Page 21:Power Consumption And Noise
The fact that, by AMD’s own admission, its new single-GPU flagship goes up against Nvidia’s second-fastest board is probably not what AMD’s loyal fan base wanted to see. And it again puzzles me to see such unrepresentative naming in play here. Think I’m off my rocker? That anyone reading Tom’s Hardware should simply “know better” and not worry what these cards are called? Just try telling me this slide from AMD's press deck doesn’t look completely off:
Had Nvidia launched GeForce GTX 580 with a slide like this showing GeForce GTX 480 up top, the world would have come to an end, I’m sure. Nevertheless, now we’re waiting for a Radeon HD 6990, which AMD tells us to expect some time in Q1. That’ll be Antilles, a dual-Cayman board that we’d expect to perform something like a pair of Radeon HD 6950s in CrossFire, so long as AMD doesn’t have to make any clock rate concessions due to excessive power demands. We're hoping that the advent of PowerTune prevents such a backwards step.
Should that come to pass, we’d be looking at a board that beats out Radeon HD 5970. There’s no telling what pricing on that will look like, but if AMD arms it with 4 GB of expensive GDDR5 memory, it’s going to be expensive. If the company doesn’t, instead matching each GPU up to 1 GB of GDDR5, it’ll suffer in the high-resolution, high-detail workloads a flagship product should dominate. I guess we answered our own question there, didn't we? Expensive flagship, incoming.
The Here And Now
That’s a story that’ll unfold in the next three months. More immediately, we have the Radeon HD 6970 and 6950, competing against the GeForce GTX 570 and GeForce GTX 470, respectively. Official pricing from AMD is pegged at $369 for the 6970 and $299 for the 6950. That’s actually slightly less expensive than I was expecting to pay for the high-end board, and a little more than I would have wanted to see the lower-end board selling.
Let’s start with the Radeon HD 6950. While it’s true that Cayman seems to be a more forward-looking DirectX 11 architecture than Cypress, and the ability to use four independent display outputs is good (as is Blu-ray 3D support), it’s still hard to ignore the fact that vendors are clearing out inventory of the Radeon HD 5870, available for as little as $260 after rebates. At the same time, GeForce GTX 470s are going for $250. The 470 doesn’t stand up as well to high resolutions, but it’s still a decent deal if you’re gaming at 1920x1080. The Radeon HD 5870 is going to disappear soon, and we're not sure how much longer the 470 will retain its position in Nvidia's lineup, given the recent emphasis on GF110. After all, it doesn't make a ton of sense to keep making new GF100s with attention shifting to the newer GPU. Until they’re gone, look to them as decent deals. Picking up last year’s graphics technology, which in this case is still very modern, is a great way to save some money.
As for the Radeon HD 6970, it should be selling for $20 more than a GTX 570. Based on its display outputs alone, that makes AMD’s card worth the Andrew Jackson to me, personally. Otherwise, the two cards trade blows, with the GTX 570 faring better at 1680x1050 as AMD’s Radeon HD 6970 retains more of its performance at 2560x1600.
Don’t lose track of the fact that you can find a pair of Radeon HD 6850s for the same $370 you’d spend on a 6970, though. Those 6800s have the same set of display outputs, UVD 3, and morphological anti-aliasing support—and they’re notably faster. If you can accommodate two cards, that is one way to go. The other is a pair of GeForce GTX 460s, which are faster in some apps and slower in others, but sell for around $190, bringing the bottom line to $380.
Considering 6900s In CrossFire
But wait, there’s more. What about the Radeon HD 6900s in CrossFire? After all, AMD claims to have made some notable improvements to its scaling.
You’re only going to buy two high-end graphics cards if you’re running at the top resolutions with visual details maxed out. That’s where the 2 GB frame buffers featured on both 6900-series cards come in handy. In many cases, two $300 Radeon HD 6950s outperform a pair of $350 GeForce GTX 570s, saving you $100 total for better frame rates. It’s hard to use the word value when you’re talking about $600 worth of graphics cards, but in this ultra-high-end space, two 6950s trump GTX 570s in bang for the buck.
Take a look back at the scaling figures. In the past, SLI would have dominated. However, we have to take AMD's word that it improved CrossFire-based performance in its driver. Comparing to the Radeon HD 6870 isn’t really fair—that board’s smaller frame buffer makes it unsuitable for 2560x1600 with anti-aliasing enabled. With that said, though, AMD plans to roll those optimizations into its other cards as well, so there should be a speed bump in store for folks running CrossFire on older cards.
- Radeon HD 6970 And 6950 Arrive
- Building Cayman By Improving Cypress
- AMD Acknowledges That Geometry Matters
- Adding Value Through Anti-Aliasing, Eyefinity, And Video
- PowerTune: Changing The Way You Overclock
- Meet Radeon HD 6970 And Radeon HD 6950
- Test Setup And Benchmarks
- Benchmark Results: 3DMark Vantage (DX10)
- Benchmark Results: Metro 2033 (DX11)
- Benchmark Results: Lost Planet 2 (DX11)
- Benchmark Results: Aliens Vs. Predator (DX11)
- Benchmark Results: Battlefield: Bad Company 2 (DX11)
- Benchmark Results: DiRT 2 (DX11)
- Benchmark Results: Just Cause 2 (DX11)
- Multi-Card Scaling In 3DMark
- Multi-Card Scaling In Metro 2033
- Multi-Card Scaling In AvP
- Multi-Card Scaling In Battlefield: Bad Company 2
- Multi-Card Scaling In DiRT 2
- Multi-Card Scaling In Just Cause 2
- Power Consumption And Noise