Radeon HD 6970 And 6950 Review: Is Cayman A Gator Or A Crock?

Test Setup And Benchmarks

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Test Hardware
Processors Intel Core i7-980X (Gulftown) 3.33 GHz at 3.73 GHz (28 * 133 MHz), LGA 1366, 6.4 GT/s QPI, 12 MB Shared L3, Hyper-Threading enabled, Power-savings enabled
Motherboard Gigabyte X58A-UD5 (LGA 1366) Intel X58/ICH10R, BIOS FB
Memory Kingston 6 GB (3 x 2 GB) DDR3-2000, KHX2000C8D3T1K3/6GX @ 8-8-8-24 and 1.65 V
Hard Drive Intel SSDSA2M160G2GC 160 GB SATA 3Gb/s
Graphics AMD Radeon HD 6970 2 GB
Row 5 - Cell 0 AMD Radeon HD 6950 2 GB
Row 6 - Cell 0 Nvidia GeForce GTX 5701.25 GB
Row 7 - Cell 0 Nvidia GeForce GTX 580 1.5 GB
Row 8 - Cell 0 Nvidia GeForce GTX 480 1.5 GB
Row 9 - Cell 0 Nvidia GeForce GTX 470 1.25 GB
Row 10 - Cell 0 2 x Zotac GeForce GTX 460 1 GB SLI
Row 11 - Cell 0 2 x AMD Radeon HD 6850 1 GB CrossFire
Row 12 - Cell 0 AMD Radeon HD 5970 2 GB
Row 13 - Cell 0 AMD Radeon HD 5870 1 GB
Row 14 - Cell 0 AMD Radeon HD 6870 1 GB
Power Supply Cooler Master UCP-1000 W
System Software And Drivers
Operating System Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
DirectX DirectX 11
Graphics Driver AMD 8.79.6.2RC2_Dec7 (For Radeon HD 6970 and 6950)
Row 20 - Cell 0 AMD Catalyst 10.10d
Row 21 - Cell 0 AMD Catalyst 10.10e (For Radeon HD 6850 1 GB in CrossFire)
Row 22 - Cell 0 Nvidia GeForce Release 263.09 (For GTX 570)
Row 23 - Cell 0 Nvidia GeForce Release 260.99 (For GTX 480 and 470)
Row 24 - Cell 0 Nvidia GeForce Release 262.99 (For GTX 580)
Chris Angelini is an Editor Emeritus at Tom's Hardware US. He edits hardware reviews and covers high-profile CPU and GPU launches.
  • terror112
    WOW not impressed.
    Reply
  • Annisman
    Thanks for the review Angelini, these new naming schemes are hurting my head, sometimes the only way to tell (at a quick glance) which AMD card matches up to what Nvidia card, is by comparing the prices, which I think is bad for the average consumer.
    Reply
  • rohitbaran
    These cards are to GTX 500 series what 4000 series was to GTX 200. Not the fastest at their time but offer killer performance and feature set for the price. I too expected 6900 to be close to GTX 580, but it didn't turn out that way. Still, it is the card I have waited for to upgrade. Right in my budget.
    Reply
  • tacoslave
    imagine when this hits 32nm?
    Reply
  • notty22
    AMD's top card is about a draw with the gtx 570.
    Pricing is in line.
    Gives AMD only hold outs buying options, Nvidia already offered
    Merry Christmas
    Reply
  • microterf
    Why drop the 580 when it comes to the multi-gpu scaling??
    Reply
  • IzzyCraft
    Sorry all i read was this
    "This helps catch AMD up to Nvidia. However, Intel has something waiting in the wings that’ll take both graphics companies by surprise. In a couple of weeks, we'll be able to tell you more." and now i'm fixated to weather or not intel's gpu's can actually commit to proper playback.
    Reply
  • andrewcutter
    but from what i read at hardocp, though it is priced alongside the 570, 6970 was benched against the 580 and they were trading blows... So toms has it at par with 570 but hard has it on par with 580.. now im confused because if it can give 580 perfomance or almost 580 performance at 570 price and power then this one is a winner. Sim a 6950 was trading blows with 570 there. So i am very confused
    Reply
  • sgt bombulous
    This is hilarious... How long ago was it that there were ATI fanboys blabbering "The 6970 is gonna be 80% faster than the GTX 580!!!". And then reality hit...
    Reply
  • manitoublack
    I'd have to say wait until the christmas new years dust settles
    Reply