Radeon R9 290X Review: AMD's Back In Ultra-High-End Gaming

Overclocking: PowerTune Changes Things

Because power, clock rate, fan speed, and temperature are all so interdependent, overclocking is not as simple as setting a frequency. In fact, even running at stock settings isn’t that easy. As we saw on the previous page, you'll start with great clock rates and taper off to something lower over time.

Catalyst Control Center: OverDrive, Updated

Changes to the Catalyst Control Center affect the performance and power consumption of AMD's Radeon R9 290X. As you can see, the OverDrive applet looks a lot different from what you're used to. There's that heat map, to begin, which defines how much power and clock rate (as percentages) to increase or decrease compared to AMD's stock configuration.

“Over Limit” instead of Overclocking

Overclocking in the traditional sense of the word doesn't really make sense with this board. Under normal conditions, and faced with a full load, the R9 290X already isn't able to sustain the "up to 1 GHz" specified by AMD. You saw that on the previous page. So, depending on the game or application you're running, Hawaii needs an extra nudge from its power limiter to run at higher speeds (and then, only if you have the cooling to allow this).

Here's a look at AMD's original settings:

Increasing the power limit by 25 percent pushes consumption up to (and briefly beyond) the 300 W available from one six-pin auxiliary connector, one eight-pin lead, and the PCI Express slot. We didn't want to risk going much higher than that for our review. Our peak power consumption measurements do show that there’s some additional headroom, though, at this point it's all conjecture since we weren't getting any performance increase attributable to a higher power limit or fan speed setting. Too-high temperatures are to blame for this.

So, how do we lower them?

Fan RPM and Target Temperature

You want to bring your temperature target down, rather than increasing it, to trigger more aggressive cooling. Here’s the default setting:

As we now know, you can no longer specify a fan speed in RPM. Instead, a maximum “up to” percentage is selected, which represents the highest duty cycle AMD's fan will spin. Again, the Quiet firmware defaults to 40%, while Uber mode stops at 55%.

You cannot override those ceilings by simply moving the slider all the way over to 100% and enjoying lower temperatures. Since AMD's 95-degree default limit can typically be maintained somewhere between 40 and 50%, you need to change the target temperature, too.

Set up like this, you're more likely to hear the R9 290X's fan hit the gas and take off. Depending on your power limit setting, it's possible to get this card's cooler spinning at 95% under full load. Those settings are the only way we were able to hit our peak power consumption measurements. 

As with traditional overclocking, increasing the R9 290X's power limit alters AMD's specification. Company representatives assure us that Hawaii is meant to be used at 95 degrees, but that's already really hot. We're not sure yet how pushing power even higher will affect the GPU's reliability. Take a cautious approach under the enthusiast community has more time to experiment (you'd better believe Nvidia is going to figure out what it takes to make this thing pop as soon as it can).

This thread is closed for comments
498 comments
    Your comment
  • beta212
    That's incredible. Especially at high res, I wonder how they do it. But the low price alone is enough to blow the competition away. Seriously think about it, it's around half the price for higher performance!
    - AMD: We're not aiming for the ultra high end.
    I think Nvidia just got trolled.
  • slomo4sho
    Great price point. This card has already broken world records just a few hours after release!


  • esrever
    2 of these for 4k looks amazing but Im a little disappointed by the power consumption when you crank up performance.
  • aznguy0028
    I was thinking about hopping on the 7970ghz when it's on sale, but after seeing this, it's time to break apart the piggy bank for the 290x, what value!
  • Benthon
    Like the conclusion said, you just can't argue about aesthetics and thermals at this price point/performance. Well done AMD, lets see team green's response! Go consumer!
  • tuklap
    This is awesome for us ^_^
  • Shankovich
    Wow, and it's pegged at 73% too. Even if nVidia's "780ti" beats the 290X, it probably won't beat a 290X running at full power. And if mantle does make some big performance boosts, nVidia is going to be in a really tight spot. Looking forward to what they'll do. In the mean time, loving this competition! We all win in the end.
  • julianbautista87
    daaaaayyyyyuuuummmm
  • anxiousinfusion
    Wait the 290 X... X? is going to be $550?! Forgive me, padre for I have sinned.
  • Darkerson
    Good job, AMD!
  • jkhoward
    I just purchased this card from Newegg.
  • CaptainTom
    Wow AMD. GG! You exceeded every possible expectation! Have fun with your GTX 780 Ti Fanboys!!!!!
  • ilysaml
    Time to Upgrade my HD 6950 to 290X, and my 1080P to 2500x Monitor.
  • lt_dan_zsu
    I've never been more blown away by a hardware review. Never have I seen a gpu beat another gpu at just over half the cost.
  • DarkForce_256
    So what's the deal with the 290?
  • shin0bi272
    it always tickles the hell out of me when an amd card ties or about ties an nvidia card in one game then in an nvidia physx game the amd kicks the crap out of the nvidia card... Of course if you know why that happens in metro you know its more of a fault of the coders not physx but its still funny.
  • jimmysmitty
    $550 is not bad for the fact that it beats the 780 easily and even pressures the Titan.

    Most of the higher resolution gaming wins come from the larger memory bandwidth and of course more vs the 780.

    That's a good sign. Maybe NVidia will drop prices and push this to $400-$450 and I will pick one up when there is a Vapor-X version of course,
  • markbro89
    Where to buy?! Newegg still says coming soon D:
  • DarkForce_256
    So what's the deal with the 290?
  • BigMack70
    Thank goodness AMD had some sense with the pricing. Finally, at long last, Nvidia can stop raping consumers' wallets due to lack of competition.

    This is win-win-win for everyone (except maybe Nvidia).

    Hope we never have to deal with a $1000 single GPU fiasco again. Good riddance.
  • harmaatukka
    I'm not sure if this is meaningful or not when it comes to benchmarking, but in real world running Skyrim over 60 fps breaks the physics of the game. The game becomes unstable with objects flying randomly around and things falling from the sky. The game may CTD as soon as in the starting sequence because you may fly out of the cart.
  • haro87
    Ill wait for the better cooling solutions to come out... seems like to get the most out of the cards cooling is the key
  • richmondHeights
    $550 for the R9 290X... You go red team! "Om nom nom"... that's the sound of Jen Hsun Huang eating his shoes. He's had 7 months to reap in profits for the high end gamer market. Now it's time to lower prices across the board. I'm hoping the GTX 780 gets lowered to $500 and Titan lowered to $650.

    Where will the GTX 780Ti fit? We'll be watching you for the the response nVidia. It better be good or you'll get creamed.

    It's beginning to look a lot like Christmas!
  • designasaurus
    As usual, AMD has a poor reference cooler. Also as usual, I expect the non-reference boards the manufacturers come up with to solve this issue handily. Sapphire, Asus, etc. will solve this card's weaknesses and charge $0-20 extra for the privilege - still a good deal if you have the patience to wait a bit.