Razer Tomahawk ATX Review: Razer Invader

A single 120mm fan in a $200 chassis isn’t going to cut it.

Razer Tomahawk ATX
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

Razer’s Tomahawk takes an excellent case as foundation and bolts on some basic design flaws, ruining a case design that could otherwise have been brilliant

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Absolute tank of a chassis

  • +

    Heavy, quality materials

  • +

    Quiet operation

  • +

    Great looks

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Restricted front intake

  • -

    Air doesn’t flow through front intake filter

  • -

    Only includes one fan

  • -

    Thermally abysmal

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

When Razer announced its Tomahawk ATX chassis, the first thing that stood out to me is that it appeared to carry the same internals as the Lian Li Lancool II Mesh, a case that we awarded full marks. As such, the Tomahawk ATX is off to a good start, but there’s one big elephant in the room that we must address before we continue: this Razer chassis, despite the same foundations, costs a mighty $200 – twice the price of Lian Li’s excellence.

Therefore, when Razer offered to send a sample, I was very curious to find out where the added $100 went. So without further ado, let's find out whether the Tomahawk ATX is actually worth its price tag and deserving of a spot on our Best PC Cases list, or whether you should save yourself some money and opt for the excellent Lancool II Mesh instead.

Niels Broekhuijsen
Contributing Writer

Niels Broekhuijsen is a Contributing Writer for Tom's Hardware US. He reviews cases, water cooling and pc builds.

  • Loadedaxe
    NZXT in disguise. Pay $130 for Razer logo?

    Get a H510 for $69, better money spent.
    Reply
  • mrv_co
    TLDNR: In Razer World, Logo trumps Logos.
    Reply
  • gg83
    This case makes no sense! Is it meant for liquid cooled cpu and videocard?
    Reply
  • g-unit1111
    As Edna Krabappel would say - "pretty lame, Milhouse".
    Reply
  • Makaveli
    Loadedaxe said:
    NZXT in disguise. Pay $130 for Razer logo?

    Get a H510 for $69, better money spent.

    I guess you never got the memo.

    Razer logo + RGB = more fps.
    Reply
  • woot
    g-unit1111 said:
    As Edna Krabappel would say - "pretty lame, Milhouse".
    Krabappel? this whole time i though it was crandall
    Reply
  • Loadedaxe
    Makaveli said:
    I guess you never got the memo.

    Razer logo + RGB = more fps.
    Ohell then, I am definately getting one!
    Reply
  • nitrium
    The old NZXT S340 Razer case was a lot better, and looks almost identical:
    https://www2.razer.com/ap-en/gaming-systems-old/s340The S340 was probably a better foundation case too(?).
    Reply
  • Mr5oh
    gg83 said:
    This case makes no sense! Is it meant for liquid cooled cpu and videocard?

    Well can't have too high of expectations from a case that puts glass on both sides of the case.... The back side of the motherboard tray, even on "cable managed" cases is not exactly "show worthy". For a lot of people's cases, it's a mess, and it's hard to get the panel back on.
    Reply
  • watzupken
    I feel the 3 stars rating is probably too optimistic for this casing. In my opinion, if the casing cannot provide decent cooling to the system, it is a clear cut fail to me. The moment I see the solid front panel, I am already expecting poor thermals in there. To me,
    Great looking case, good sound isolation, poor airflow (thermals) - This is an instant fail
    Great airflow, bad sound isolation and average looks - This is still more acceptable than 1
    Great airflow, decent sound isolation and looks good - This is the toughest to balance and probably worth the higher scores. Sound isolation can only be decent in an airflow case unless they provide very low RPM fans.
    I feel a lot of companies want to get into the casing business, but just buying an off the shelf design will not cut it. One can water cool it, but the radiator will still need good airflow to run cool after some time. So there is no excuse for poor airflow in a case that cost this much.
    Reply