Snapmaker Artisan 3-in-1 Review: Bigger, Faster, Better

One gigantic machine to cut, carve and build.

Snapmaker Artisan
Editor's Choice
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

Snapmaker Artisan is an extra large, easy to use, deluxe all-in-one 3D printer, laser and CNC machine that takes up an enormous amount of space.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    3-in-1 machine

  • +

    Dual print head

  • +

    Direct Drive

  • +

    Auto bed leveling

  • +

    Massive build size

  • +

    Includes enclosure

  • +

    Built in WiFi

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Massive footprint

  • -

    Pricey

  • -

    Can’t print well in TPU

  • -

    Limited to Snapmaker replacement parts

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

The Snapmaker Artisan is a 3-in-1 machine capable of large scale 3D printing, carving and laser engraving. It is much improved over its predecessor, the Snapmaker 2.0, with additional build volume, faster speeds and quick release modules that snap into place in a matter of minutes. It has a direct drive with an interesting dual hotend – two extruders that share one tool head.

Other premium features are speedy linear rails on the X and Y axis, a traditional dual Z axis for stability, a two-sided PEI coated glass build plate and built-in WiFi. The laser module has been beefed up to a very capable 10 watts that can engrave as well as cut materials up to 8mm. The CNC tool head has also been souped up with 200W capable of 18,000 RPM. 

Denise Bertacchi
Freelance Reviewer

Denise Bertacchi is a Contributing Writer for Tom’s Hardware US, covering 3D printing. Denise has been crafting with PCs since she discovered Print Shop had clip art on her Apple IIe. She loves reviewing 3D printers because she can mix all her passions: printing, photography, and writing.

  • vtechev
    There seem to be some errors or omissions in some of the measurements:
    The build volume is listed as 400mm x 400mm x 400mm. 400mm is 15.75 inches, so why is it converted to "(12.6 x 13.7 x 13 inches)" ?
    It seems unlikely that Denise was able to save "at least 300 kg of filament" on the Mandalorian helmet. Maybe grams instead of kilograms? That still seems like a lot but it is a large print.
    Also, how fair is it to say that the printer "can't print well in TPU"? The actual discussion in the review indicates that the default settings didn't do well with TPU, but that's the sort of thing calibration is for isn't it? Unless there's something intrinsic to the machine to make it bad at TPU, "can't" seems a bit hyperbolic.
    Reply
  • stlDenise3d
    Hi vtechev!

    I am terribly sorry about the typos -- we'll get those fixed right away.

    And you're right, I saved well over 300 GRAMS on the Mando helmet! I was comparing Luman's default support setting, which filled the entire inside of the helmet with dense support material to what I was able to get after using Luman's paint on supports. Using a technic I picked up from master cosplayer Frankly Built, I removed all the interior supports, much of the outer supports and only kept those in critical areas.

    I will stand by my opinion on TPU, where I stated it did not print well. Sure, you can tune a printer. However, I'm reviewing the machine as it comes out of the box, not my ability to tweak settings. When a machine costs $2899, I would hope that it performs decently on basic materials.
    ~Denise
    Reply