Star Wars: Battlefront Benchmarked
May the FPS be with you! We test Star Wars: Battlefront's graphics performance on different hardware. Our results provide some good news: older graphics cards do just fine fighting the Galactic Empire.
Results: 45 Graphics Cards And iGPUs At Full HD
Ultra Preset For (Almost) Everyone
Since our Endor test scene is one of the most challenging you'll encounter, we'd expect average frame rates to be much higher in other maps. On the next page, we’re also going to show how the different presets affect performance and where (good) playability ends.
We were very disappointed that SLI and CrossFire weren’t supported at launch or at the time of this test. After digging into our bag of tricks, we came up with a way to have the game use Battlefield 4’s profile, resulting in a touch of alternate frame rendering (AFR). Unfortunately, even this ended up not really being usable.
AMD's Radeon graphics cards perform very well across every generation, demonstrating the value of optimizing drivers before a game launches and even taking part in some of the development process. We’ll see a bit later how Fiji catches up with its competition when the going gets roughest.
Bottom Line
Generally speaking, everyone who wants to play this game should be able to run it smoothly, including owners of entry-level GPUs and APUs. If you own a more powerful graphics card, we strongly recommend a quad-core host processor for the online maps. Running it at high clock rates doesn't hurt either. Star Wars: Battlefront might not scale linearly as you add on-die resources, but six or eight cores still yield smaller performance gains.
All of this makes Star Wars: Battlefront a good example of a well-optimized title that successfully compromises between eye candy and hardware scaling. It also does a great job running on lower-end configurations.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Results: 45 Graphics Cards And iGPUs At Full HD
Prev Page Test Scene Selection Next Page Results: UHD And Quality Presets-
Ck1v1 first of all.Reply
why is this so late?
second, why is this running old drivers that nobody uses anymore.
new drivers have solved lots of issues and with increased performance, especially for AMD.
Also 290 running 1440p with the real life mod and everything set to ultra runs the game at 80fps, and thats with a 4670k @ 4.4ghz -
FormatC The review was published at November the 23th 2015 in German and the drivers were really fresh at this time.Reply
http://www.tomshardware.de/star-wars-battlefront-grafikkarten-benchmark-hardware-anforderungen,testberichte-241982.html
I have no idea why this review was over two months in the US pipeline :( -
rambodas I want a new GPU for BF4 and the next battlefield release.My 650 ti boost died on me.My rig : i5 3450,8 gb ddr3,500 watt CM PSU,monitor 60 Hz 1600*900( may update to 1080p in the future).My budget around 250$.Reply -
Cryio I want a new GPU for BF4 and the next battlefield release.My 650 ti boost died on me.My rig : i5 3450,8 gb ddr3,500 watt CM PSU,monitor 60 Hz 1600*900( may update to 1080p in the future).My budget around 250$.
Either get a 380 4 GB now, or wait for Polaris and Pascal. Though that may take the duration of the year to launch.
-
Sakkura The colors in the 1080p chart are a mess.Reply
The HIS R9 290, Sapphire R9 380X, HIS HD7970, and MSI R9 380 show up in green.
The Gigabyte GTX 780, GTX 690, and MSI GTX 770 show up in red. -
blppt Wondering why you list the FX-8350 in the test system box when there are no cpu benchmarks here.Reply