Nvidia 3D Vision Vs. AMD HD3D: 18 Games, Evaluated

Need 4 Speed: Hot Pursuit

AMD HD3D and the TriDef Ignition Driver:

Good 3D result with Virtual 3D mode

The TriDef solution allows us to leave shadow detail at the highest setting

While normal mode doesn't work in this game, it does run well using the TriDef Ignition driver's Virtual 3D setting.

Nvidia 3D Vision:

Not recommended

Nvidia's 3D vision requires setting reductions, but there remain a number of distracting anomalies during gameplay

This game suffers from shadow, light halo, and doubling artifacts when 3D Vision is enabled.

Shadows can be fixed using the lowest quality setting, but they are rendered as blobs instead. The light halo/doubling artifacts are unfortunately unavoidable. This solution is not recommended, as the artifacts are quite distracting.

  • renick
    nvidia 3d vision is best in all............
  • Kamab
    Except for the ones where it's not recommended. Good thing I have one on this rig! Now I just got to shell out some cash for some 3D Tech.
  • the_krasno
    3D is over hyped in my opinion, it will be some more time before games can correctly exploit it.
  • falchard
    Everytime nVidia pushes out a proprietary format they shoot themselves in the foot. They just can't make it marketable with such a low market share. You need something like Microsofts 90% market share to think about making a closed standard.
    Anyone notice the bevel on the Samsung model. That beautiful for multi-monitor.
  • Scanlia
    Great comprehensive review! Loved it.
  • alyoshka
    Nice one, and really long awaited.
  • i tried Tridef in EVE online, absolutely stunning. :)
  • SteelCity1981
    During preliminary testing, we noticed that a decent Phenom II X4 had some trouble providing smooth frame rates, and mid-level graphics cards were cut down to their knees

    Time for Bulldozer!!!
  • assassin123
    i loved it great review keep it up
  • RazberyBandit
    Would it kill Tom's to use high-resolution pop-up pics? It's nearly impossible to discern any differences in detail or artifacts when comparing such low-resolution images. C'mon...1024 x 317? Seriously?