MediaTek reportedly mulling US chip production — could use TSMC's Arizona fab to avoid tariff fallout

TSMC
(Image credit: TSMC)

MediaTek is negotiating production of certain chips in the U.S. with TSMC in a bid to meet customer requirements for locally manufactured components. While the plan is still under evaluation, if MediaTek manages to place orders through TSMC's Fab 21 in Arizona, it will be the first non-American company to demand production of its chips at the site. While chips made by TSMC in the U.S. are more expensive than those fabbed in Taiwan, U.S. production may enable MediaTek to address certain customers and/or avoid potential tariffs.

Word of MediaTek's intentions comes from the company's Corporate Vice President JC Hsu, reports Nikkei. The plans target two specific categories: automotive parts and chips tied to more regulated or strategically sensitive applications. The move is said to comply with demands from American clients who favor domestic production for logistical and policy-related reasons. Hsu stressed that the deal has not been formally inked yet.

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • A Stoner
    I almost have a feeling that this plant is going to be given credit for 2 to 5 times as many chips as it could possibly ever process in order to avoid the tariffs. I certainly hope the Supreme Court does the right thing and smacks down abuse of the laws that is currently allowing this travesty.
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    reminder: TSMC themself stated any US made chips are going to cost more than chips at their main fab.
    Reply
  • jlake3
    A Stoner said:
    I almost have a feeling that this plant is going to be given credit for 2 to 5 times as many chips as it could possibly ever process in order to avoid the tariffs. I certainly hope the Supreme Court does the right thing and smacks down abuse of the laws that is currently allowing this travesty.
    Care to elaborate on why you suspect TSMC will commit fraud on such a massive scale, and what law is currently allowing it? Because I can't think of a way to give credit to a US factory for a product made overseas that won't crumble immediately in the face of even mild scrutiny from customs, and won't create some strange numbers when you file with the IRS.
    Reply
  • jwnm
    jlake3 said:
    Care to elaborate on why you suspect TSMC will commit fraud on such a massive scale, and what law is currently allowing it? Because I can't think of a way to give credit to a US factory for a product made overseas that won't crumble immediately in the face of even mild scrutiny from customs, and won't create some strange numbers when you file with the IRS.
    Good response. One to many bong hits on his part.
    Reply
  • Tanakoi
    A Stoner said:
    I almost have a feeling that this plant is going to be given credit for 2 to 5 times as many chips as it could possibly ever process in order to avoid the tariffs. I certainly hope the Supreme Court does the right thing and smacks down abuse of the laws that is currently allowing this travesty.
    Relying on a nation that China claims as its own for the microchips the US military needs for its weapons isn't a wise move. The CCP places "stoners" in re-education camps, you know.
    Reply
  • A Stoner
    The chips do not stay in the USA. They get shipped overseas to be packaged leaving ample opportunity for scamming the system.

    TSMC fraudulently built AI chips for China and tried to argue they could not tell the identical chips they were making for company B were in fact the same as the chips they had previously made for company A.

    So, yes, I think that somehow these chips made in the USA, shipped overseas for packaging, and then reshipped back into the USA are ripe for scamming, and TSMC does not specifically need to be the ones making the fraudulent claims of provenance.
    Reply