White House won't ask for ownership stake in TSMC or Micron in exchange for CHIPS Act funds — companies already investing more in the US expected to be exempt

The White House
(Image credit: Shutterstock)

TSMC and Micron are reportedly spared from Washington’s move to ask for an equity stake in exchange for CHIPS Act funding. According to the Wall Street Journal, a government official stated that there are no plans to request shares from CHIPS Act recipients that have or are increasing their investments in the country. “The Commerce Department is not looking to take equity from TSMC and Micron,” the official told the publication.

The talk of equity in exchange for the Biden-era grants gained steam when U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick confirmed during a live interview with CNBC that the White House is in talks with Intel to acquire a 10% stake in the company for the nearly $8 billion allocated under the CHIPS Act. But what caught the attention of almost every other grant recipient is Lutnick’s planned expansion of this plan to other chip makers.

“We should get an equity stake for our money,” Lutnick said during the interview. “So, we’ll deliver the money, which was already committed under the Biden Administration. We’ll get equity in return for it; get a good return for the American taxpayer, instead of just giving grants away.”

Some entities have reacted to this statement, with South Korea denying that the U.S. will acquire shares in Samsung, the country’s crown jewel, whose revenue accounts for nearly 20% of its GDP. There were also discussions within TSMC to return the subsidies if Washington pushes through with its plan. To assuage the concern rippling across the industry regarding this plan, the White House clarified that companies that have already increased their investments beyond the original commitment under the CHIPS Act.

Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • hotaru251
    NGL I actually support equity > grants for large corpos.
    It has downsides that grants don't have so if they frick up and need help from a Gov they are punished instead of getting a free parachute of tax payer $.
    Reply
  • baboma
    >I actually support equity > grants for large corpos.

    It's a bad idea because it creates a conflict of interest when the govt has a vested interest in a business' well-being. The govt's job is to regulate businesses.

    >It has downsides that grants don't have so if they frick up and need help from a Gov they are punished instead of getting a free parachute of tax payer.

    Some things are beyond the resources of any one single company, and require govt intervention. China has poured untold billions into subsidies for EVs, solar, pharmaceuticals, etc etc. It's why it's now dominant in all those industries, despite all of their innovations having their starts in the US.

    Get beyond the "bailouts are bad" cliche.
    Reply
  • JamesJones44
    Unlike Intel, who really doesn't have a choice, I would tell the gov to get lost on this deal. Instead I'll just close the plants and your companies can deal with the tariffs. None of these companies are likely to move away form TSMC at the moment. Micron, while its position is not as strong as TSMC's, is still has a strong position to say no thank you and walk away.
    Reply