Uh oh. This is certainly news Microsoft does not want to hear about one month before the official release of its Windows 8 operating system.
At a company meeting, Paul Otellini reportedly told employees that Windows 8 is released before it is "fully ready", according to an article published by Bloomberg. However, getting Windows 8 ready now is the right decision and Microsoft can release updates afterwards to fix bugs.
It is not unusual that software ships with some bugs as many companies typically resort to an 80/20 strategy in which 80 percent is good enough and the remaining 20 percent too expensive to achieve. We should also remember that Microsoft also released Windows XP and Windows 7 in October to be able to make the Christmas season of sales. Vista was originally scheduled for an October 2006 release, but delayed to January 2007 due to critical bugs. Microsoft used "Express Upgrades" in October 2006 instead - and had to deal with a logistic disaster in early 2007. If Microsoft can avoid a delay for Windows 8, it will go to great lengths to do so, even if that means that Windows 8 will ship with some annoying bugs.
Of course, it is highly unusual that Otellini's remarks, if they were made in the reported way, are making it into the public. Windows 8 has already been criticized left and right and if Intel now suggests that the operating system still has bugs that need to be worked out, then more than just a few prospective computer buyers may decide to stick with Windows 7. That, of course, also means that Intel will be taking a hit in potential CPU sales as customers are delaying their purchases.

You installed a prerelease operating system across your organization's network?! Holy sh*t if I was the CIO/CISO of your company I would fire you on the spot.
You say that like it's a bad thing...
(drum sting)
Don't forget to tip your waitperson, folks, and don't bring your kids to the 10:00 show...I work blue...
I'm sure that since your 2 systems are running good that surely means Windows 8 must not have any problems at all.
You installed a prerelease operating system across your organization's network?! Holy sh*t if I was the CIO/CISO of your company I would fire you on the spot.
It's not prerelease any more, volume license customers can get it for deployment/testing in their networks. I've been running the RTM version on my work PC for over a month, and haven't experienced any bugs so far. I'm sure the start screen will shock people at first, but you rarely see it anyways.
I probably wouldn't roll it out to everyone before October 25th, but I'd definitely have a few workstations setup with it for compatibility testing in a large enterprise.
Yeah, a lot of companies' managements are very hesitant about upgrading.
Especially with beta software. Proposing a upgrade to a beta OS would get one laughed out of the conference room.
(drum sting)
Don't forget to tip your waitperson, folks, and don't bring your kids to the 10:00 show...I work blue...
I have been using the Windows 8 OS for developing over a year now and its been fine.
What makes Windows8 worth the price of admission for someone that already has Windows7?
Lets start some more rumors..
Larry Paige sais windows 8 won't allow users to access Google with internet explorer, and they are blocked from installing Chrome.
Tim cook states iTunes no longer installs or functions on windows 8 and their dev team cannot get it working in time for release.
Sources say the Mists of Pandaria expansion does not install on the windows 8 OS.
Yeah, let's all use ARM in our PC's! /s
ARM is great, but x86 is undeniably more powerful.
I view it as unavoidable even if you have a large beta because on retail release your program is put through it paces a lot more and thus more bugs are found.
You say that like it's a bad thing...