Corsair settles lawsuit over advertising XMP memory speeds, and you could get paid — the settlement covers U.S. purchases between 2018 and 2025 for overclocked kits

Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB DDR5-5200 C38
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)
Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Zak Killian
Contributor

Zak is a freelance contributor to Tom's Hardware with decades of PC benchmarking experience who has also written for HotHardware and The Tech Report. A modern-day Renaissance man, he may not be an expert on anything, but he knows just a little about nearly everything.

  • TechieTwo
    IMO if you don't understand that all DRAM runs at the JEDEC default speed unless overclocked, then it's your lack of technical understanding not false advertising. I've used all of the popular brands of memory and I've never seen any DRAM that didn't indicate that the actual speed the DRAM will operate at depends on your CPU, memory controller, mobo and DRAM. To me these types of lawsuits are gold digging by unscrupulous entities.
    Reply
  • autobahn
    lol a buck for me, a million for the lawyers.
    Reply
  • Math Geek
    Close but a quarter and a sticker if you're lucky. And 500 million for the lawyers
    Reply
  • JayGau
    Yep, another cash grab from unscrupulous lawyers while the people they were "working for" will get almost nothing. And the money Corsair will have to pay for this is money that surely won't go into improving iCUE or developing better PSU, RAM and fans.
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    Now if they could have only figured out a way to sue AMD over their notoriously picky IMC on the Ryzen 1000 series. Us early adopters not only had to deal with faulty CPUs (some just segfaulted, mine completely died), but had to deal with a very limited selection of RAM which may or may not have worked even if it were on the motherboard compatibility list. Expensive G.Skill Flare RAM was basically what we had to use...
    Reply
  • hannibal
    Hmmm... all memory makers advertise like this...
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    hannibal said:
    Hmmm... all memory makers advertise like this...
    Same with hard drives, and the lawsuit from 20 years ago.
    https://www.crn.com/news/channel-programs/189602434/western-digital-settles-hard-drive-capacity-lawsuit
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    USAFRet said:
    Same with hard drives, and the lawsuit from 20 years ago.
    https://www.crn.com/news/channel-programs/189602434/western-digital-settles-hard-drive-capacity-lawsuit

    Is amazing how many people -still- think they're "losing capacity" vs what's stated on the package.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    Is amazing how many people -still- think they're "losing capacity" vs what's stated on the package.
    Or how many other people, who should know better, attribute it to "formatting".
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    USAFRet said:
    Or how many other people, who should know better, attribute it to "formatting".

    Just hope those people don't discover how much capacity they're ACTUALLY losing if they're using 64K cluster sizes on a drive that has many files under that amount due to overhang.

    https://i.ibb.co/RpFkJk9G/Screenshot-2025-09-13-141804.png
    Reply