Redditor fishes a fully-functional Core i5-9400F and GTX 1660 PC gaming rig out of the trash

Another nice trash find
(Image credit: Alternative-Run363 on Reddit)

A Redditor thanked his father for gifting him something that he plucked out of the trash. Alternative-Run363 claims that his dad enjoyed a big ‘W’ by fishing out a PC packing an Intel Core i5-9400F, an Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660, and more. That’s a ‘W’ indeed, since it all seems to work, and Windows 11 is installed and activated. It's certainly better than the kipper bones, tin cans, or old boots that Thomas Jasper Cat Sr. usually found in the trash.

My dad Found this pc to me in the Trash with an gtx 1660 and a i5 9400f w dad from r/PcBuild

In this latest case of finding computer treasure in the trash, we don’t get much of a backstory regarding the find. However, it certainly looks like the PC system in the picture has seen better days. You can clearly see dust and grime has built up in this machine over the years. From the single picture, it is difficult to determine if there are dust filters missing or if they were just unmaintained. According to the social media posting, there's a glass side panel that was removed for the photo.

So, let’s take a closer look at what Alternative-Run363 managed to snag for the grand total of zero dollars and zero cents:

  • CPU: Intel Core i5 9400F
  • CPU Cooler: Asetek Shark Gaming AiO
  • GPU: Asus Phoenix Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660*
  • Motherboard: Asus TUF B360-Plus Gaming motherboard*
  • RAM: 16GB dual-channel
  • Storage: 500GB Kingston A2000 M.2 NVMe SSD
  • Case: InWin chassis with at least two system fans
  • PSU: Unknown, unknown condition
  • OS: Windows 11 was installed by Alternative-Run363, and they found out it was activated
  • (*We guessed these precise component models after some pixel peeping)

In summary, we have here a mid-range gaming PC that was probably put together between 2018 and 2020. As it stands, it should perform respectably at 1080p in PC titles of that era (and older), and it will also be fine for daily office and web-based activities. We’d still recommend a thorough de-dusting of the system and would be tempted to throw in a fresh PSU (we can’t see any condition indicators for the existing top-mounted unit).

Depending on Alternative-Run363’s intended purpose for this system, the platform could be upgraded to a higher-tier 9th Gen Intel Core processor. Right now, the system packs a modest hexa-core CPU without hyperthreading. The B360 board could be upgraded with a Core i9-9900 to deliver 8 cores and 16 threads of processing, for example.

Meanwhile, there are oodles of GPU upgrades possible thanks to the enduring PCIe standard. But in the context of this system, and its PCIe 3.0 x16 slot, you would probably look for bargains from the old Nvidia RTX20 or AMD RX5000 series.

We note that the freshly unleashed Borderlands 4 official system requirements mention an Intel Core i7-9700 and RTX 2070 / RX 5700 XT in its minimum specifications column. So, in theory, this trash find could be dragged up to a level to enjoy the newest episode of this looter shooter. Don’t blame us if Borderlands 4 runs horribly, though; that seems to be a trend.

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button!

Mark Tyson
News Editor

Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.

  • ezst036
    These stories are essentially non-news and click generation.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Yeah, I don't see why this is news. There are always going to be a few good finds at second-hand stores, auctions, and in dumpster diving. As far as that goes, this doesn't even seem too remarkable. It was an entry-level spec in its day and that was like 6 years ago.

    If all the hardware is working properly (or you don't mind sinking some time into diagnosing and fixing whatever problems it might have), it certainly could be worth something to someone. But, this isn't even up there with someone winning a lottery.

    Here's a known-working system with the same specs, that recently sold for $235 on ebay:
    https://www.ebay.com/itm/226940929653
    Would you expect to see a news story about somebody finding a wallet in the trash with $235 in it? I wouldn't.
    Reply
  • Paul Alcorn
    bit_user said:
    Yeah, I don't see why this is news. There are always going to be a few good finds at second-hand stores, auctions, and in dumpster diving. As far as that goes, this doesn't even seem too remarkable. It was an entry-level spec in its day and that was like 6 years ago.

    If all the hardware is working properly (or you don't mind sinking some time into diagnosing and fixing whatever problems it might have), it certainly could be worth something to someone. But, this isn't even up there with someone winning a lottery.

    Here's a known-working system with the same specs, that recently sold for $235 on ebay:
    https://www.ebay.com/itm/226940929653
    Would you expect to see a news story about somebody finding a wallet in the trash with $235 in it? I wouldn't.


    P.S. Should you want to comment on a story without clicking on it, you can see all news story comment threads indexed in the News section of the forums:
    https://forums.tomshardware.com/forums/news-comments.68/
    Are you encouraging people to comment on articles without actually reading the article? Misguided discussion that is ill-informed about the subject matter and/or what the articles *actually* say is a very, very common problem. I don't see how this would help.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Paul Alcorn said:
    Are you encouraging people to comment on articles without actually reading the article?
    How else can we complain about news coverage without sending a conflicting message by clicking on the very article we're complaining about? If there's another way to provide feedback, then I would use it. Perhaps we could also offer suggestions of news coverage or testing we'd like to see? I'm very much open to suggestions, here!
    : )
    In general, I make a concerted effort to completely read stories I comment on.

    Thanks for responding to my post, BTW.
    Reply
  • Udyr
    These "stories" are being posted almost every other day now. How are these proven to be true?

    Now that they're getting attention, anyone can post a random somewhat old build and say they got it for a nickel.
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    In summary, we have here a mid-range gaming PC that was probably put together between 2018 and 2020.

    I'd say an entry level gaming system put together in 2019, not mid-range, which would be more RTX 2070.
    Reply
  • jg.millirem
    I found an old Cray-2 supercomputer from the 70s inexplicably disassembled and crammed into some dumpsters at my local park. Working on cleaning up now!
    Reply
  • bit_user
    jg.millirem said:
    I found an old Cray-2 supercomputer from the 70s inexplicably disassembled and crammed into some dumpsters at my local park. Working on cleaning up now!
    Now that's a find!

    It reminds me of someone I knew who found an old Stardent mini-computer type machine, back in the late 1990's. In his case, it was in storage, at the university he attended (i.e. more complete and in better shape than what you'd typically find in a dumpster). I think it was something like this, if not the exact model:
    https://www.computerhistory.org/collections/catalog/X1570.98A/?media=88165
    He and a couple of his friends put a fair amount of time & effort into getting it working, but I'm not sure they ever got it to boot. So, I guess my caution would be that an old machine of unknown provenance should not be presumed to be functional. I would only undertake trying to restore it, under the supervision of someone with suitable expertise.

    However, if you just want to clean it up to use as furniture, then go for it! And please post pics, if/when you've got it presentable!
    : )
    Reply