2:00 AM - 02/12/2009 by
Thomas Soderstrom
- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (87) |
- Share
Occasional stuttering isn’t as bad a problem for real-time strategy (RTS) game play, although some players will point out that persistent lag can ruin a strategy. Supreme Commander Forged Alliance offers the high details needed to stress our high-end equipment.


Most players would find 35.8 FPS at 2560x1600 playable, but turning on AA and AF ruins the Forged Alliance experience.


Both systems tear through World in Conflict at amazing speeds.
Topics being discussed on the forums
- I know its been beaten to death: phenom ii 955 vs i5 gaming [CPU & Components]
- Quiet i7, SSD, $1500-$2000 [Homebuilt Systems]
- Core i7 Overclocking Guide [Overclocking]
- Core i7 build $2100 budget [Homebuilt Systems]
- $1500 i7 Build for the Buck! - Buying Tomorrow! [Homebuilt Systems]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!
- 1 / 5
- Next
-
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- Will this plat WoW?
- Is the i7 worth getting now or later?
- Need better performance for single threaded apps
- Real Quad?
- Upgrading My Computer
- Overclocking my 1.6A
- Memory question please, thank you.
- Ok... In a bit of a pickle... mobo/ram/psu
- ¤Help¤Time for a new system build, share your thoughts
- Hardware and OS help please (gamer type system build)
- CAD build
- Extreme Gaming PC Build
- Average? i7 build
- Noob RAID 0 questions
Best offers
|
Compaq Presario CQ5210F Mini-Tower... | $299.98 STAPLES More info |
|
iMac All-In-One Desktop (3.06GHz... | $1699.00 AppleStore.com More info |
|
iMac All-In-One Desktop (3.06GHz... | $1149.00 MacConnection More info |
|
Pavilion p6240f Mini-Tower Desktop... | $549.98 STAPLES More info |
|
Pavilion p6210f Mini-Tower Desktop... | $546.98 STAPLES More info |
Popular Searches
- forged alliance benchmark
- supreme commander forged alliance benchmark mode
- forged alliance fps
- forged alliance stuttering
- ssd overclock
- supreme commander forged alliance benchmark
- supreme commander forged alliance speed
- supreme commander forged alliance time lag
- supreme commander forged alliance i7
- supreme commander forged alliance sound and performance problems
- supreme commander forged alliance lag mid game
- supreme commander forged alliance performance checker
- occasional stutters in games why
Partners
The Games selection
crazy :
Interactive Boogy
Pick one of the 3 songs, hit on the correct keys matching this boy's dance moves.
|
action :
Yoyo the Star
Yoyo is a young girl who recently graduated and dreams to become a movie star (don't we all). You'll have to guide her on the path to stardom,...
|
Ads







Nice article!
I wish i could own a rig like that,but it would be that or a 383 stroker for the F-body..lol I can dream cant I?
Nice article!I wish i could own a rig like that,but it would be that or a 383 stroker for the F-body..lol I can dream cant I?
383 strokers are for copycats. Basically, too many bad 400 blocks and people found a cheap way to re-use the cranks to make their 350's bigger. If you have THIS kind of money, you'd might as well go BIG BORE too. Maybe a bowtie block? At any rate, you'll win more races with a real 400 (or larger custom size) so long as the block is good.
It is interesting to note on Page 14. On the Sandra XII Multimedia test the Core i7 965 @ 4.2GHz scored 486,971, while the i7 920 @ 4.0GHz scored 386,867. The difference was 200MHz and made such a large difference. Did the Intel SSDs influence such a large gain in performance or the DDR3 @ 1800MHz or perhaps a combination of both?
It is interesting to note on Page 14. On the Sandra XII Multimedia test the Core i7 965 @ 4.2GHz scored 486,971, while the i7 920 @ 4.0GHz scored 386,867. The difference was 200MHz and made such a large difference. Did the Intel SSDs influence such a large gain in performance or the DDR3 @ 1800MHz or perhaps a combination of both?
The 965 has a higher-bandwidth QPI link, so it should be good for boosting at least a few synthetic scores.
BAH!! Why is it always Intel? Only Servers and people that wish they MAC should use Intel stuffs.. Who else is going to use all of it's features? Not gamers, that is for sure!! Like a gamer is going to spend the extra $$ for ECC memory and not spend it on more important stuff like a GC or a great board. That and an economy minded PC buyer will go AMD anytime, more bang for the buck...
Also, Ati is better a better card, for linking I mean. The support may be crap, but it is usually worth it to get them! 4850 X2, Water cool one and watch the clock go through the roof!
Intel is the fastest thats why...This is supposed to be an uber rig.
Ya crashman thats the problem i dont have that kind of money..lol A fresh stock rebuild bolt on's and spray will have to hold me off until better times!
¿ "Intel is the fastest" ? Amd 2.0 is a 4.0 in the intel world...
I would love to seen those Windows boot times with those RAID 0 Intel SDD's!
Yeah, Optimize the heck out of it and take all of the unnecessary stuff out.. Probably 4 sec boot, Awesome!
Intel is the fastest thats why...This is supposed to be an uber rig.Ya crashman thats the problem i dont have that kind of money..lol A fresh stock rebuild bolt on's and spray will have to hold me off until better times!
I spec'd out a friend's 406 C.I. mouse a few years ago and he got through under $4500 with aluminum heads and a roller cam!
... maybe build some AMD based systems too, to see, how they stack up against in price/performance... just for tha fun of it...
Great article!
HOWEVER, Should have used an Antec1200 for that much coin on the case. I have one at home using water cooling and its so much easier than any other case I've used to date. Cheaper too, in this instance.
Great article!HOWEVER, Should have used an Antec1200 for that much coin on the case. I have one at home using water cooling and its so much easier than any other case I've used to date. Cheaper too, in this instance.
I've owned both, the Cooler Master is a nicer case. I mean, we're just throwing opinions around now, right?
But the Cosmos S is far more portable, and it fits the big radiator perfectly. In fact, it's the only stock case to fit that radiator properly.
With a build like that you guys should have tryed to set Crysis with 16 AA!
well it probably wont be playable but it would just be neat to see.
I've owned both, the Cooler Master is a nicer case. I mean, we're just throwing opinions around now, right?But the Cosmos S is far more portable, and it fits the big radiator perfectly. In fact, it's the only stock case to fit that radiator properly.
Thats true, but I didnt know we were going for portability here, especially with a liquid cooled system.
There's no way that sound "card" is up to the level of a $5k rig.
Nice article.
Question for the writing staff:
Have you thought about taking all your review statistics, and assembling an "uber system" based on the best parts based on what you have found in your review tests?
Just curious. I don't remember that ever having been done before here. And for $5,000, you surely could afford to throw together all of the top notch parts into a system for kind of a "what happens when you put all the best parts together" article.
Now you guys have me itching to build a new system already...and I just built one back in September!! lol
That is a really good question too:
With the width of the video cards, where would you plug in a soundcard? Does it use the 3rd PCI-E x16 slot?
Just curious. I've always noticed how the ATX motherboard size standard hasn't shifted to grow with the growth of the size of components, such as video cards and component heatsinks.
Limited room bites. lol
Why not 3 liquid cooled 285's. Maybe drop the Blueray and or go down to a 920 in the next one. Keep the SSD's.
Why not 3 liquid cooled 285's. Maybe drop the Blueray and or go down to a 920 in the next one. Keep the SSD's.SSD's are fast but the only benchmarks they matter in are the ones that don't count (synthetics)
SSD's are fast but the only benchmarks they matter in are the ones that don't count (synthetics)