Asus Zenbook S16 review: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 tested

A sleek AMD-based laptop built for AI workloads.

Asus Zenbook S16
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The Asus Zenbook S16 is a pretty showcase for AMD's Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, with an attractive design with a spacious touchpad, not to mention strong performance. But its display could be slightly brighter, and Arm-based laptops have better battery life.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Beautiful design

  • +

    Strong performance

  • +

    Big touchpad

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Asus software has trials, wants accounts

  • -

    Display dimmer than competitors

  • -

    Battery life isn't as good as Arm laptops

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

It's rare that my lasting impression about a laptop is all about style, but here we are. The Asus Zenbook S16 ($1,399.99 to start, $1,699.99 as tested) is a vehicle for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and one of the first AMD Ryzen AI 300 series laptops on the market, but it's also just a nicely designed laptop. Design and performance are both important parts of our considerations for the list of the best ultrabooks.

Asus's new Zenbook uses some proprietary materials, including an aluminum/ceramic mix on the lid that looks straight-up classy. The light gray paired with white accents is pretty, but not overwhelming, and the fact that it houses strong performance shows that beauty isn't just on the outside.

That’s not to say this is a perfect laptop. While it did well on our battery test, Arm-based machines often lasted much longer. And the OLED display, while colorful, isn't as bright as some competitors.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Andrew E. Freedman
Senior Editor

Andrew E. Freedman is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on laptops, desktops and gaming. He also keeps up with the latest news. A lover of all things gaming and tech, his previous work has shown up in Tom's Guide, Laptop Mag, Kotaku, PCMag and Complex, among others. Follow him on Threads @FreedmanAE and BlueSky @andrewfreedman.net. You can send him tips on Signal: andrewfreedman.01

  • TheSecondPower
    Usually there is no tech news on Sunday, so when I came here at 0956 to find this article that was published at 0900, I expected it to be the first article. It was the 8th article. This is a CPU launch review. The first article is just an ordinary laptop review about a laptop with an 8000-series CPU which "is about to be outdated".
    Reply
  • zsydeepsky
    by doing the AI benchmark, maybe you can also test running some 7-8B scale LLM locally in LM Studio and see how it performs. If the NPU can run llama-3 8B with a decent token generation speed (like maybe 10-20 tokens/second with a short initial wait time), then it could be proven useful for some privacy-sensitive users.

    AMD claimed that Ryzen AI supports LM Studio:
    How to run a Large Language Model (LLM) on your AMD Ryzen™ AI PC or Radeon Graphics Card
    Reply
  • Ksec
    The number for MBA M3's GB6 are wrong. It is very likely to be 3093, not 2093.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    If anyone is interested in seeing in-depth benchmarking of this laptop on Linux developer & compute workloads, Phoronix has their review up:
    https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-ryzen-ai-9-hx-370
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    I'm actually suprised with this thing.

    Leaving AMD's stupid naming sense, this new SoC looks very promising. I'd like to see it in a 45W+ capable chassis, as I strongly suspect "this is not his final form".

    Regards :P
    Reply
  • Notton
    78Whr battery: yae
    only a single NVMe slot: boo
    that's an unnecessary sacrifice to shave off 1mm of thickness.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    baboma said:
    I find it misleading, because the methodology is flawed. Said review compares only laptops, not CPUs, as mobile CPU performance is by and large dictated by imposed power limits and heat dissipation, which vary greatly per laptop.
    That's just how it is. Reviewers often try to account for differences between laptop implementations by trying to compare laptops with different CPUs using laptops from the same manufacturer and model lineup, under the hope that the TDP configurations and thermal solutions will be nearly identical.

    baboma said:
    Looking at the variety of laptops Phoronix used in the compare, it's a gross mischaracterization. The laptops cover a wide range, from 13/14" ultraportables (ie w/ restricted power limits and low cooling) to 16" desktop-replacements.
    Phoronix is a small operation. If you want to see testing between models that are more comparable, try NotebookCheck. However, they mostly focus on Windows, from what I've seen.

    They tested the same model, because that's apparently what AMD has provided to reviewers:
    https://www.notebookcheck.net/Asus-Zenbook-S-16-laptop-review-The-first-Copilot-laptop-with-AMD-Zen-5-inside-a-1-3-cm-thick-case.868219.0.html
    Expect to see them test more models, in the coming days & weeks.
    Reply
  • Karl_Schwarzschild
    Why no word about graphics performance? I see that it's not the main selling point of this laptop, but it's a nice addition and I would be interested to see how the 890M delivers in casual gaming scenarios!
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    baboma said:
    THW can be informative for certain things. Laptop reviews aren't one of them. Just hit YouTube, https://youtube.com/results?search_query=zenbook+s16+review
    Re: Zenbook S16 iGPU (both 890M & 880M in separate SKUs) - TL/DR is they underperform, being equivalent to 8840HS (780M) in 3DMark tests, and worse than MTL's ARC iGPU. This was reported in a couple of reviews; one is below.

    RiI9UGO3Ta0:620View: https://youtube.com/watch?v=RiI9UGO3Ta0&t=620s
    The main takeaway I get from Ryzen 365/370 is good power efficiency, which makes it best suited for ultraportables and thin&lights.
    UyZgHSv9C2kView: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UyZgHSv9C2k

    MpfceLUZqQIView: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpfceLUZqQI

    And even Linus say these are just amazing.

    You know why? Because they're 28W and beating everything above their weight.

    Regards.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    baboma said:
    The main takeaway I get from Ryzen 365/370 is good power efficiency, which makes it best suited for ultraportables and thin&lights.
    But it also has 12 cores, which really makes me wonder how well its performance scales to 45W and above. Yes, 8 of those are Zen 5C cores, but they still have similar IPC to Zen 5 cores and I doubt they're reaching peak clocks at just 28 W.

    baboma said:
    Ryzen AI will get its 15mins of fame, before Lunar/Arrow Lake shows up.
    Lunar Lake only goes up to 4P + 4E and loses hyperthreading. I expect AMD could retain the crown for multithreaded performance, at least. That could make it the developer laptop of choice (for non-Mac folks, at least).

    Arrow Lake won't hit the laptop market until the end of this year or early next.
    Reply