RTX 4090 Beats Two RTX 3090s in SLI — Barely

YouTube channel Benchmark Lab has decided to test Nvidia's new GeForce RTX 4090 in a unique fashion — by pitting it against two RTX 3090s in SLI. 

That's right, SLI — Nvidia's obsolete multi-GPU tech that Benchmark Labs managed to run using some unknown SLI-enablement magic. The channel was able to run SLI decently well in several DX11, DX12, and Vulkan titles, but ultimately the 3090s couldn't beat the RTX 4090 (though they got close). 

Before we jump to the results, it's worth noting that all of this should be taken with a grain (or several) of salt. SLI has been unsupported for years at this point, and getting it to work with most modern titles — especially with DX12 and Vulkan — would require...unorthodox methods. We're not sure how Benchmark Lab managed to enable SLI in most of the games tested — again, specifically the DX12 versions — or if the results were doctored or extrapolated. That said, the results are pretty interesting (if they are, indeed, accurate). 

In Spider-Man Remastered, with maxed out settings (Ray Tracing and DLSS Balanced mode enabled), the RTX 3090s in SLI achieved 80 - 85 frames per second (fps) on average, while the RTX 4090 managed a noticeably higher 95 fps average. 

For the rest of the titles, check out the video below: 

YouTube YouTube
Watch On

RTX 3090 SLI Is The Only Setup That Can Get Close To The RTX 4090

With the exception of the Cyberpunk 2077 results, the RTX 3090s in SLI were around 8 - 15% slower than the RTX 4090. For an SLI implementation, this isn't bad at all — and it's the only GPU configuration we've seen so far that can get close to the RTX 4090's performance bracket. For some perspective, the next-closest GPU is the RTX 3090 Ti — which trails the 4090 by over 50% based on our tests

Sadly, the 3090s in SLI setup wasn't being used to its full potential, as the secondary 3090 consistently maxed out at 45% utilization. This is one of the pitfalls of SLI setups, in which bad optimization leads to less-than-superb GPU utilization on the secondary card. In theory, if we could get anywhere close to 100% utilization on both GPUs, we would probably see the 3090s in SLI outperform the 4090 by a good margin. 

But the chances of that happening are extremely unlikely, since Nvidia officially killed off SLI in the form of physical bridges with the RTX 40 series. SLI support has dwindled so much over the past several years that it's basically only useful in synthetic benchmarks at this point. 

There are technically ways of enabling SLI (unofficially) in games that don't support it — like in the case of the benchmarks seen in this video. But these results are unpredictable at best, and usually result in system instability or severe micro-stuttering problems while gaming. 

There is some hope for SLI, however. Multi-GPU workloads are very common in the enterprise space, and Nvidia even has multi-GPU technologies that don't require an NVLink or SLI bridge. 

On the gaming side, modern APIs such as DX12 and Vulkan do have the capability to render frames to two completely different GPUs in tandem. So there's a chance multi-GPU tech might make its way back to the gaming space, eventually (but whether developers want to support multi-GPU technology for gaming is a different story). 

Aaron Klotz
Contributing Writer

Aaron Klotz is a contributing writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering news related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards.

  • Makaveli
    As pointed out in the article SLI is dead and have been for awhile now. So I would take these unoptimized 3090 SLI numbers with a huge grain of salt.
    Reply
  • Gam3r01
    "This just in, SLI has been dead for a while now"
    This is a very unsurprising result.
    Reply
  • Christopher_115
    "that Benchmark Labs managed to run using some unknown SLI-enablement magic."

    This makes this article completely useless. :rolleyes:
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    In theory, if we could get anywhere close to 100% utilization on both GPUs, we would probably see the 3090s in SLI outperform the 4090 by a good margin

    In reality we'd see $2000+ of video cards performing higher than ~$1600 of video card while lacking support for DLSS 3.0.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    Christopher_115 said:
    "that Benchmark Labs managed to run using some unknown SLI-enablement magic."

    This makes this article completely useless. :rolleyes:
    Not useless.
    Shows the folly of trying to chase "SLI" with current GPUs.
    Reply
  • Abaddon
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    In reality we'd see $2000+ of video cards performing higher than ~$1600 of video card while lacking support for DLSS 3.0.
    Sounds like bull to me. In reality (having just bought a 3090 this month) you can get three 3090's cheaper than one 4090 currently. If SLI scaled well and wasn't such a mess around, I'd definitely consider a second.
    Reply
  • Gam3r01 said:
    "This just in, SLI has been dead for a while now"
    This is a very unsurprising result.
    And news at 11 —- SLI is STILL dead
    Reply
  • bavor
    In Port Royal, my SLI 3090s still beat a 4090, with the exception of the world top overclockers using LN2 to cool a 4090. I'm getting 31,000-32,000 scores in Port Royal. However, for gaming, the 4090 is faster because very few games support SLI with 3090s.

    One of the main reasons SLI is dead is the person at Nvidia that ran and promoted SLI left the company. Very few games support Explicit Multi GPU in DX12 even though its easy to implement.
    Reply