The Week In Storage And CPUs: Transistors Hit 1nm, PCs Continue To Plummet, IBM Takes Cap Off CAPI

This week in storage and CPUs found news that researchers are developing the first 1nm transistors, which is a promising development as Moore's law grinds to a halt. Speaking of grinding to a halt, the PC market continued its frightening fall. The industry is pounding the war drums of open interfaces, and IBM and all its friends joined forces to combat Intel's aspirations of an Intel-branded datacenter. We'll cover those after the recap. There's a lot of cud this week, so let's get right to chewing.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • Scrotus
    I'd be more than happy to help the slumping PC market if only Intel would hurry up and ship some Kaby Lake desktop CPU's. I've got all the new parts except for a motherboard, CPU and memory and I don't want to forge ahead with a skylark setup with the new Kaby Lake and series 200 chipsets coming. Why is Intel dragging its feet and keeping the ship date a secret? I may consider jumping ship to AMD.
    Reply
  • CRamseyer
    It is because AMD hasn't shipped an enthusiast product Intel is not shipping Kaby Lake. Just my .02.
    Reply
  • wifiburger
    i think the pc market will continue it's downfall and I think it's thanks to Microsoft monopoly hold on the OS,
    once Microsoft garbage software die the market will recover,
    apple, google is doing fine and those don't care about Microsoft garbage software
    Reply
  • Larry Litmanen
    The smaller the PC market gets they less investment goes into it.

    Here's the problem, PC experience is amazing on the high end, with SSD PC boots in seconds and on a 34 inch 1440P monitor everything is amazing. But MOST people are not in that area, most people buy PCs for $300-$400 and suffer with them and abandon the market.

    Here's how i would resuscitate the PC market, if i am Intel i would have every new chip on the market support nothing but 1080P displays at a minimum as to get rid of everything below it. I would only support storage that boots in under 15 seconds. I would discontinue all support for any output that is older than HDMI. I would discontinue support for monitors that are smaller than 20 inches.

    People would upgrade if they had issues accessing Facebook or Internet browser, maybe these tech companies can work with those to make browsers more feature rich to encourage people to buy more powerful hardware.
    Reply
  • sykozis
    18730646 said:
    The smaller the PC market gets they less investment goes into it.

    Here's the problem, PC experience is amazing on the high end, with SSD PC boots in seconds and on a 34 inch 1440P monitor everything is amazing. But MOST people are not in that area, most people buy PCs for $300-$400 and suffer with them and abandon the market.

    Here's how i would resuscitate the PC market, if i am Intel i would have every new chip on the market support nothing but 1080P displays at a minimum as to get rid of everything below it. I would only support storage that boots in under 15 seconds. I would discontinue all support for any output that is older than HDMI. I would discontinue support for monitors that are smaller than 20 inches.

    People would upgrade if they had issues accessing Facebook or Internet browser, maybe these tech companies can work with those to make browsers more feature rich to encourage people to buy more powerful hardware.

    Doing something so utterly stupid would almost completely kill the PC market.

    If you drop support for monitors smaller than 20 inches, the laptop market dies.

    People can access Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, etc from their smartphone. This is why the PC market has been in a decline.

    Your plan would do considerably more harm to the industry than good.
    Reply
  • Martell1977
    The PC market is slumping, in my opinion, because of both hardware ad software, but not so much the OS. We all know that Intel has either gotten complacent or they are having a lot of trouble tweaking their architecture for substantial performance gains. My primary machine still rocks a i7-950, yet there is no good reason for me to upgrade it. My secondary PC runs C2Q Q9550 OC'd to 3.6ghz and can run many of my programs rather well, though at some reduced settings.

    On the software side, there is really a slump in new IP. All the FPS games are pretty much the same but with different skins and slightly different graphics quality. The RTS market is basically Blizzard and a few small companies. But then there are a multitude of games for smartphones and tablets. I think at this point there is much more variety outside the PC market. Back in the '90s there was a wide variety of games and they were a blast to play, my personal favorite was "The 7th Guest", but there is nothing on the market even close to it today.
    New graphics upgrades are great, but there needs to be some variety, rehashing the same thing over and over gets old. AMD is probably banking on VR to revitalize the market.
    Reply
  • mrmez
    18730646 said:
    The smaller the PC market gets they less investment goes into it.

    Here's the problem, PC experience is amazing on the high end, with SSD PC boots in seconds and on a 34 inch 1440P monitor everything is amazing. But MOST people are not in that area, most people buy PCs for $300-$400 and suffer with them and abandon the market.

    Here's how i would resuscitate the PC market, if i am Intel i would have every new chip on the market support nothing but 1080P displays at a minimum as to get rid of everything below it. I would only support storage that boots in under 15 seconds. I would discontinue all support for any output that is older than HDMI. I would discontinue support for monitors that are smaller than 20 inches.

    People would upgrade if they had issues accessing Facebook or Internet browser, maybe these tech companies can work with those to make browsers more feature rich to encourage people to buy more powerful hardware.

    That's a great idea, and companies like Apple have gone that route and become highly profitable.
    Unfortunately the PC market is driven firstly (ND Maybe solely) by price, and lastly by consumer experience. Suggest buying a Mac, and the first 10,000 comments will be "get a pc with 10x the spec for 1/10th the price".
    How can I explain the user experience of a 5K imac to a user who's still debating the cost of 1440. Harder still when I've been using 5K for 2 years now, and 1440... well that's 2009 for me.

    Now this is a gaming centric ENTHUSIAST forum, and not representative of the pc market. Don't forget that. We OC and water cool while the 95% of the market think a bus is how some people get to work.

    Enthusiast motorists want to do engine and drivetrain swaps in their garages, but look out your window and 99.9% of cars are pre-built. There will always be enthusiasts in every area (thankfully), but computers today are almost utilities, standardised tools. I don't want to buy a drill in bits and assemble it, I just want to choose my model and start using it.
    Reply
  • Tom Griffin
    If and when virtual reality really comes to mainstream instead of a bunch of demos I can see a small increase in actual PC sales.
    Reply
  • memadmax
    The Gen-Z consortium and the interface will probably be the most important conglomerate that we see in our lifetimes.

    Not only does it defeat intel, but also microsoft, as both have teamed up to corral us into a closed system...
    Reply
  • wifiburger
    I think the harsh reality of PC market decline is tied to the vast unpopularity of Microsoft OS,
    nobody wants to invest in a PC and get stuck with Windows, prob Apple, Google Chromebook will steal another chuck soon enough
    Reply