Conclusion - AMD's Phenom 9600 Can't Beat Intel's Q6600
Our review sample of AMD's Phenom 9600 Black Edition offered overclocking potential of 17%, but to achieve this, we had to set the core voltage quite high, at a level we would not recommend for long-term use. We achieved the most sensible overclock at a clock speed increase of 13%, allowing the Phenom 9600 to run in a stable manner even at its default core voltage. Like AMD's first Black Edition model, the Athlon 64 X2 6400+, the overclocking potential is so low that the unlocked multiplier is almost not worthwhile. This calls the entire concept of the Black Edition in general into question. The single exception is the Athlon 64 X2 5000+, which we found to offer rather good overclocking potential. You can read a more detailed analysis here.
Even when overclocked, our sample of the AMD Phenom was unable to beat Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600
Also, the Phenom's power consumption is much too high - our measurements point to a thermal problem in Cool'n'Quiet mode. When the Phenom 9600 Black Edition was overclocked, we measured a thermal dissipation that could only be handled with a very loud air-cooling solution or a water cooler.
For now, AMD's OverDrive utility is unsuitable for overclocking. It's "functionality" ranged from the error message "No AMD CPU found" to crashing our review system. The values determined in the utility do not correspond to those found in the BIOS, and AMD itself does not support the OverDrive tool. The only Black Edition CPU that really benefits from its unlocked multiplier is the old Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Black Edition. In the end, we can't really recommend AMD's Phenom 9600 Black Edition, since the CPU draws more power than Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 while costing the same, offering less overclocking headroom, and thus providing lower performance overall.
The bottom line is that the Phenom 9600 Black Edition offers bad value for money. Based on our benchmark results and the direct comparison with Intel's Q6600, AMD's CPU should cost no more than $220, in our opinion.
Current page: Conclusion - AMD's Phenom 9600 Can't Beat Intel's Q6600Prev Page Video Encoding - CloneDVD
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
I think on page 14 the author meant:Reply
"When Cool'n'Quiet is deactivated, idle power consumption rises to 51 watts. The jump in power consumption at 2.70 GHz is a direct result of the core voltage increase from 1.250 V to 1.400 V."
And the bars for Phenom 9600 BE and Phenom 9600 BE (CnC) should be switched around.
I think it's also important to mention the fact that Vista SP1 includes it's OWN TLB fix which overrides the bios setting of many boards. I used an app that works in conjunction with Crystal CPUID to change the MSR directly to deactivate this secondary TLB fix. It caused a dramatic improvement in performance; the quick and simple WinRAR bench went from 232 to ~1300 after the fix. Just think it's worth mentioning!Reply
I think I may have found a new problem with this bug. I have a Phenom X4 9600, and have tried two different motherboards. The problem occurs when running Windows 7. BSOD with a message stating that the operating system did not receive an clock interupt signal from the second processor. At first I thought it was a bios problem, but have since had to replace the motherboard. Tried Windows 7 again after replacing the motherboard and still having the same problem.Reply