AMD Radeon RX 460 Review

How We Tested Radeon RX 460

The subject of today’s performance evaluation is Sapphire’s Nitro Radeon RX 460 OC (Igor is testing Asus' Strix card for power, temperatures, and acoustics). Whereas the RX 460 is specified at a 1090 MHz base and 1200 MHz boost frequency, Sapphire operates this model at a 1175 MHz base and 1250 MHz boost clock rate. This figure holds steady at 1250 MHz during our 10-loop Metro: Last Light Redux stress test, too. Sapphire arms the board with 4GB of GDDR5 memory, which we’d consider the right amount for a 1920x1080 target. You’ll see in our benchmarks, even at reduced graphics settings, where 2GB comes up short.

The rest of the field consists of Radeon RX 470 4GB, Radeon R9 270X 2GB, Radeon R9 270 2GB, Radeon HD 7790 2GB, GeForce GTX 950 2GB, GeForce GTX 760 2GB, and GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB.

The RX 470 isn’t the same Asus card we tested for that model’s launch. Instead we have Sapphire’s Nitro RX 470, which more closely resembles AMD’s actual specification with a 932 MHz base and 1216 maximum boost frequency.

Our Radeon R9 270X sample dates back to the original Curaçao launch in 2013. That card is reference-class, and sports a 1 GHz base clock rate with 5600 MT/s memory. Its GPU later came to be called Trinidad, appearing in the Radeon R9 370X with the same number of Stream processors at the same 1 GHz frequency. Consider the two roughly equivalent.

The Radeon R9 270 is a Sapphire Dual-X model with a 920 MHz base core clock and 945 MHz maximum boost.

That Radeon HD 7790 might seem downright ancient (it’s about three and half years old, after all). But its Bonaire processor went into Radeon R7 260X and Radeon R7 360. The clocks and shader configs differ somewhat, but all three land very close to each other for all practical purposes.


Core Clock (Reference)
Memory Clock (Reference)
Sapphire Nitro Radeon RX 460 OC 4GB
1250 MHz (1200 MHz)
1750 MHz (1750 MHz)
Sapphire Nitro Radeon RX 470 4GB
1216 MHz (1206 MHz)
1650 MHz (1650 MHz)
Radeon R9 270X 2GB
1050 MHz (1050 MHz)
1400 MHz (1400 MHz)
Sapphire Dual-X R9 270 2GB
945 MHz (925 MHz)
1400 MHz (1400 MHz)
Gigabyte Radeon HD 7790 2GB
1075 MHz (1000 MHz)
1500 MHz (1500 MHz)
EVGA GeForce GTX 950 FTW Gaming ACX 2.0 2GB
1405 MHz (1290 MHz)
1652 MHz (1652 MHz)
GeForce GTX 760 2GB
888 MHz (888 MHz)
1450 MHz (1450 MHz)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB
1200 MHz (1200 MHz)
1350 MHz (1350 MHz)

As we shift from big GPUs that beg for potent platforms to more mainstream graphics cards, the editors start debating whether to use lower-end hardware in our reviews. This is particularly relevant with low-level APIs like DirectX 12 and Vulkan in play. For now, though, in the interest of fairness, we’re sticking with our Core i7-6700K-based test bed. After all, we’ve already benchmarked everything from Nvidia’s Titan X to AMD’s RX 470 on the same configuration. But rest assured we’ll circle back once AMD and Nvidia slow down with these launches to explore the topic in more depth. By then we hope to have one or two more shipping DX12-based titles to test with, too.

Drivers And Benchmarks

AMD’s Radeon RX 460 is unlike either of the Polaris-based cards already available. Its target market is different, and as such the way we test it needs to change.

The company’s marketing material is particularly bullish on e-sports, though it also talks about the more conventional titles we’re used to seeing in graphics card reviews. Although the RX 460 wields less than one-half of the RX 470’s Stream processors, it’s still wholly capable of playable performance at 1920x1080.

As such, we retained Ashes of the Singularity in DirectX 12 mode, Doom using the Vulkan API, Grand Theft Auto V in DirectX 11, Hitman with DirectX 12 active, Project CARS in DirectX 11, and The Witcher 3 in DirectX 11 from our Radeon RX 470 review. Of course, all of those games had to be re-tested to account for relaxed quality settings. To that collection we added StarCraft II and World of Warcraft, the former based on DirectX 9 and the latter set to utilize DirectX 11.

All of the cards in our Radeon RX 460 review are tested using the most current drivers available to press: AMD recently posted Radeon Software Crimson Edition 16.7.3 to its site, which gets identified as newer than our 16.8.1 build, while Nvidia gave us GeForce 368.98.

DirectX 12, Standard quality preset, built-in benchmark
Vulkan, High quality preset, custom benchmark, 60-second PresentMon recording
DirectX 11, High quality settings, 2x MSAA, built-in benchmark (test five), 110-second Fraps recording
DirectX 12, Medium level of detail, SMAA, Medium texture quality, built-in benchmark, 95-second PresentMon recording
DirectX 11, Medium quality settings, DS4X/SMAA anti-aliasing, Medium texture resolution, Nürburgring Sprint, 100-second Fraps recording
DirectX 9, Ultra quality preset, Polt vs. Snute 2016 Circuit Match, 100-second Fraps recording from 3:00 mark
DirectX 11, Highest quality settings, HairWorks disabled, custom Tom’s Hardware benchmark, 100-second Fraps recording
DirectX 11, Quality preset '7', custom benchmark, 60-second Fraps recording

MORE: Best Graphics Cards

MORE: Desktop GPU Performance Hierarchy Table

MORE: All Graphics Content

This thread is closed for comments
91 comments
    Your comment
  • chaosmassive
    oh, you already such small chip
    why is that disabled CU?
  • gdmaclew
    Just curious as to why you are showing a link to Newegg for the AMD FX-8370 at $169.99? The actual price for that CPU at Newegg has been $189.99 for the past week.

    Edit: Should have thanked the authors for their excellent review first. Well done.
  • AndrewJacksonZA
    Thanks for the review Chris and Igor, I've been waiting for this one! Nicely structured, logical, easy to follow. :-)

    I agree with your conclusion: I've been looking for a replacement for my 6670 1GB DDR3 that I picked up in 2012 for $65 and this looks good. I was, however, expecting to see a MSRP of between $85 and $100.

    Thanks again,
    Andrew
  • CaptainTom
    CURB STOMP!

    Very relieved this performed better than those leaked benchmarks. So it is indeed a 70w 7870 for $110.

    The are already sold out btw lol
  • turkey3_scratch
    The only one available is a Sapphire RX 460 and it is $170 on Amazon (it's also on Newegg but is sold out). So the RX 460 is being priced what the RX 470 was supposed to be. And the RX 470 is being priced what the RX 480 was supposed to be.

    Am I the only one having trouble figuring out where this sits performance-wise? It seems to be all over the place from game to game. CaptainTom, not sold out yet, 12 in stock https://www.amazon.com/Sapphire-Radeon-NITRO-Graphics-11257-02-20G/dp/B01J1M4HDS/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1470662745&sr=8-2&keywords=rx+460

    Also, these Asus coolers suck. I'm definitely not going to be recommending any Asus card this generation.
  • rush21hit
    This is it. For an entry-level and low powered $100 card at this caliber nVidia can't touch this. This is the winning chip.

    If there will ever be cutdown 1060 with 3B as planned, knowing nVidia, it won't even come near this price.
  • AndrewJacksonZA
    1712875 said:
    Am I the only one having trouble figuring out where this site performance-wise?
    I think that there's one very big thing that the RX 460 has in it's favour over it's older brethren: the new APIs.
  • turkey3_scratch
    700347 said:
    This is it. For an entry-level and low powered $100 card at this caliber nVidia can't touch this. This is the winning chip. If there will ever be cutdown 1060 with 3B as planned, knowing nVidia, it won't even come near this price.


    The 1060 is whoppingly better. Why would it ever come to this price? Pinch me also if you honestly see an RX 460 for $110.
  • envy14tpe
    Major gap between 470 and 460. Kinda weird. I was expecting more from the 460.
  • AndrewJacksonZA
    1712875 said:
    700347 said:
    This is it. For an entry-level and low powered $100 card at this caliber nVidia can't touch this. This is the winning chip. If there will ever be cutdown 1060 with 3B as planned, knowing nVidia, it won't even come near this price.
    The 1060 is whoppingly better. Why would it ever come to this price? Pinch me also if you honestly see an RX 460 for $110.
    I think rush21hit was talking about the rumoured 3GB 1060 which was supposed to be "severely cut down," to put it mildly, not the real, actual 1060 which is in a whole different class. One can almost buy 3x 460s for 1x 1060.

    Having said that... Let's just wait for the 1050 and 1040 to drop before we declare an absolute winner in this price segment, shall we? But right now, you are correct rush21hit, Nvidia has nothing to compete in this price range. I look forward to seeing the changed Best Graphics Cards for the Money article. ;-)
  • InvalidError
    1712875 said:
    The 1060 is whoppingly better. Why would it ever come to this price? Pinch me also if you honestly see an RX 460 for $110.

    A "cut down 1060" will likely be the 1050 - gotta do something with the 1060 rejects. But when that happens, I don't expect them to be available for much under $200.

    Where prices are concerned, all of them will come down to the MSRPs or lower in a few months. As Chris said, tons of people were waiting for 14/16nm for their next GPU, so they may be on back-order for a while.
  • AndrewJacksonZA
    125865 said:
    Where prices are concerned, all of them will come down to the MSRPs or lower in a few months.
    I think it might be wise for people to sit tight until Black Friday, it's only 109 days away (and counting! Lol.) However, if a situation is urgent, it's urgent. :-)
  • turkey3_scratch
    125865 said:
    1712875 said:
    The 1060 is whoppingly better. Why would it ever come to this price? Pinch me also if you honestly see an RX 460 for $110.
    A "cut down 1060" will likely be the 1050 - gotta do something with the 1060 rejects. But when that happens, I don't expect them to be available for much under $200. Where prices are concerned, all of them will come down to the MSRPs or lower in a few months. As Chris said, tons of people were waiting for 14/16nm for their next GPU, so they may be on back-order for a while.


    I don't understand why they were waiting for 14/16nm so much. Maxwell was a larger jump in price/performance and performance/power than we have seen with Pascal so far. AMD, well, it's not a rebrand at least but their cards aren't that much more efficient. The drop to 16nm for Nvidia has not shown any more of a performance or power increase that they have not achieved on the same node size. Again, I'll refer to Maxwell which was quite great at lowering power a lot and increasing performance a lot, too.
  • Oranthal
    741589 said:
    CURB STOMP! Very relieved this performed better than those leaked benchmarks. So it is indeed a 70w 7870 for $110. The are already sold out btw lol


    Not sold out on newegg now. They tend to say released at 9am est but there is always a lag. I had the same thought with the 480 then bought one as I looked at 8:50 am all the way until 10am.
  • Oranthal
    125865 said:
    1712875 said:
    The 1060 is whoppingly better. Why would it ever come to this price? Pinch me also if you honestly see an RX 460 for $110.
    A "cut down 1060" will likely be the 1050 - gotta do something with the 1060 rejects. But when that happens, I don't expect them to be available for much under $200. Where prices are concerned, all of them will come down to the MSRPs or lower in a few months. As Chris said, tons of people were waiting for 14/16nm for their next GPU, so they may be on back-order for a while.


    Lol Newegg has a 109.99 one right now.
  • Nima84
    So it consumes as much as 950 while being slower or on par at best and more expensive. I'm not impressed at all.
  • turkey3_scratch
    2277213 said:
    125865 said:
    1712875 said:
    The 1060 is whoppingly better. Why would it ever come to this price? Pinch me also if you honestly see an RX 460 for $110.
    A "cut down 1060" will likely be the 1050 - gotta do something with the 1060 rejects. But when that happens, I don't expect them to be available for much under $200. Where prices are concerned, all of them will come down to the MSRPs or lower in a few months. As Chris said, tons of people were waiting for 14/16nm for their next GPU, so they may be on back-order for a while.
    Lol Newegg has a 109.99 one right now.


    $120 for the XFX. What one do you see?
  • payneg1
    I was hoping to see this pitted against the 960 4GB...
  • turkey3_scratch
    Powercolor is $110. XFX has a 4GB card on Amazon for $140. It's an ITX card so I am interested. But it's too expensive.
  • Onus
    I wanted to see one WITHOUT the 6-pin PCIe cable tested. This looks like it should kick the GTX750Ti off its low-power throne, but I want to see benchmarks to be certain. As such, a $110 price isn't unreasonable if we get half-height single-slot versions; Igor gets one as soon as it appears (at a fair price).
  • turkey3_scratch
    47340 said:
    I wanted to see one WITHOUT the 6-pin PCIe cable tested. This looks like it should kick the GTX750Ti off its low-power throne, but I want to see benchmarks to be certain. As such, a $110 price isn't unreasonable if we get half-height single-slot versions; Igor gets one as soon as it appears (at a fair price).


    I don't think we're going to see any without a 6-pin PCIe cable. Furmark goes past 100W, gaming is 85W-90W. It'd have to be severely downclocked.
  • Juha_Bach
    O ffs YES thest a entry level GPU on 1080p. Real smart. Its a video card for poor people for the love of god. Who is gonna buy this for a 1080p ultra gaming? Test it on lower resolution and in more appropriate titles. People buy GPU with games in mind, not other way around. Its like that in propably 99% of cases. You see a game you want to play and when you figure you cant play in on your junk, you buy new parts to make it posible. Thats how people buy GPUs lets not fool ourselfs. So when someone buys RX 460 its gonna be to play specific game and on specific resolution and level of details. Probably 1280 x 1024 or something like that. Most of people are gonna get it for HOTS, Overwatch, Dota, LoL, WoW, etc. So when you get cards like this dont just test it on 1080p+ but test it on lower resolution with higher details and see results with simmilar cards like 270, 950, 370 and 750ti. FFS be more proffesional when doing your job. Its not a mid class or high end card. Its a entry level GPU for poor people.
  • nix27
    Should i buy rx 460 or gtx 950 75w (available for 115$) for hd gaming?
  • turkey3_scratch
    I got mine on Newegg for $120. I got the XFX 2GB version. It was a tough decision with the GTX 950 for $15 more bucks or so. Note that I specifically need a low profile card, so the $125 EVGA ACX 2.0 GTX 950 would not do. A 750Ti was only a bit cheaper and I have owned one in the past. The R7 370, about the same price. So, I got it. Should give me a satisfiable gaming experience.