AMD Radeon RX 460 Review

Frequency, Temperature & Noise Results

GPU Boost Clock Rates & Voltages

Let’s first take a look at boost clock rates in our Doom benchmark. These are the frequencies that Asus' Strix RX 460 achieves after warming up. A stable 1256 MHz without any fluctuations is evidence of the factory-overclocked graphics card’s higher power limit. Our Sapphire Nitro Radeon RX 460 OC performs similarly, maintaining 1250 MHz. There should be ample room left for additional overclocking on both cards, especially in light of the relatively low GPU temperatures reported at the bottom of this page.

This changes dramatically under full load, where large fluctuations are observed. An additional 15W are enough to send the Strix RX 460 headlong into its power limit. The result is illustrated in the chart above.

The voltage curve looks similar. During our gaming loop, Asus' Strix RX 460 peaks at 1.14V (we calculated the average at 1.125V with minimal fluctuations). During the stress test, though, those fluctuations become much more significant. Once again, the culprit is the card’s power limit.

Temperatures

Asus cools Polaris 11 well. The Strix RX 460 posts 64°C during both the gaming loop and stress test, which increases to 66°C and 67°C, respectively, when we place the platform in a closed PC case. There's really nothing to complain about as far as the GPU is concerned.

The infrared picture shows that the temperature under the GPU's package is in line with the processor's internal sensor. Elsewhere, there's an 83.4°C hotspot on top of a small component located between the GPU and voltage converters, above the power supply circuits.

Cranking up the load pushes the hotspot toward Polaris 11. It’s definitely not located below the voltage converters. It's hard to attribute those higher temperatures to 15W of additional waste heat alone. It's time for a closer look.

To get to the bottom of this, we’re using an overlay view by superimposing the infrared picture onto the back of Asus' Strix RX 460. Several shunts appear to amplify the hotspot. Fortunately, our peak readings are in a non-critical range. But this part of the board's layout wasn't designed very well, as the GPU heats up from below, through its package. Over time, this leads to higher fan speeds since Asus chose a target temperature of 65°C that it enforces aggressively.

Fan Curves & Noise

We applied a filter to the fan speed results as well, which makes for a smoother curve that’s easier to interpret. In this case, the curve corresponds well to the percentage set by the PWM controller. It steps in aggressively during gaming workloads, but shows restraint during the stress test. This explains the significantly higher board temperature we couldn't pin on an additional 15W.

A high fan speed is a big price to pay for the relatively low 64°C maximum temperature. Then again, fan blades spinning quickly generate a lot of air turbulence, which gets us wondering what this card's acoustic profile looks like.

As usual, the noise measurements are performed using our silent water-cooled PC in our sound-dampened anechoic chamber built for just this purpose. The setup's practical lower limit is 22 dB(A) due to the measurement system's hardware.

Test System And Equipment
MicrophoneNTI Audio M2211 (with Calibration File, Low Cut at 50 Hz)
AmplifierSteinberg UR12 (with Phantom Power for Microphones)
SystemGraphics Card Test System with Optimized Water Cooling
- Intel Core i7-5930K @ 4.2 GHz, Water-Cooled
- Crucial Ballistix Sport, 4x 4GB DDR4-2400
- MSI X99S XPower AC
- 1x Crucial MX200, 500GB SSD (System)
- 1x Corsair Force LS, 960GB SSD (Applications, Data)
- be quiet! Dark Power Pro, 850W Power Supply Unit (PSU)
Water Cooling- Alphacool VPP655 Pump (Undervolted)
- Alphacool NexXxos CPU Cooler
- Phobya Balancer
- Alphacool 24cm Radiator
- 2x 12cm Noiseblocker eLoop Fan @ 400 RPM
SoftwareSmaart v.7
Measurement ChamberCustom-Made Proprietary Measurement Chamber, 3.5 x 1.8 x 2.2m (LxDxH)
Measurement PositionPerpendicular to Center of Noise Source(s), Measurement Distance of 50cm
Measurement Data- Noise Level in dB(A) (Slow), Real-time Frequency Analyzer (RTA)
- Graphical Frequency Spectrum of Noise

The Strix RX 460's 36 dB(A) reading is an improvement compared to what we measured from Asus' Strix RX 470. The outcome is solid overall.

There’s room for a custom fan curve, especially during cooler months. If you live in a warmer climate, it be necessary to leave Asus' default in place. Fortunately, that's not a big deal in this case.

MORE: Best Graphics Cards

MORE: Desktop GPU Performance Hierarchy Table

MORE: All Graphics Content

This thread is closed for comments
91 comments
    Your comment
  • chaosmassive
    oh, you already such small chip
    why is that disabled CU?
  • gdmaclew
    Just curious as to why you are showing a link to Newegg for the AMD FX-8370 at $169.99? The actual price for that CPU at Newegg has been $189.99 for the past week.

    Edit: Should have thanked the authors for their excellent review first. Well done.
  • AndrewJacksonZA
    Thanks for the review Chris and Igor, I've been waiting for this one! Nicely structured, logical, easy to follow. :-)

    I agree with your conclusion: I've been looking for a replacement for my 6670 1GB DDR3 that I picked up in 2012 for $65 and this looks good. I was, however, expecting to see a MSRP of between $85 and $100.

    Thanks again,
    Andrew
  • CaptainTom
    CURB STOMP!

    Very relieved this performed better than those leaked benchmarks. So it is indeed a 70w 7870 for $110.

    The are already sold out btw lol
  • turkey3_scratch
    The only one available is a Sapphire RX 460 and it is $170 on Amazon (it's also on Newegg but is sold out). So the RX 460 is being priced what the RX 470 was supposed to be. And the RX 470 is being priced what the RX 480 was supposed to be.

    Am I the only one having trouble figuring out where this sits performance-wise? It seems to be all over the place from game to game. CaptainTom, not sold out yet, 12 in stock https://www.amazon.com/Sapphire-Radeon-NITRO-Graphics-11257-02-20G/dp/B01J1M4HDS/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1470662745&sr=8-2&keywords=rx+460

    Also, these Asus coolers suck. I'm definitely not going to be recommending any Asus card this generation.
  • rush21hit
    This is it. For an entry-level and low powered $100 card at this caliber nVidia can't touch this. This is the winning chip.

    If there will ever be cutdown 1060 with 3B as planned, knowing nVidia, it won't even come near this price.
  • AndrewJacksonZA
    1712875 said:
    Am I the only one having trouble figuring out where this site performance-wise?
    I think that there's one very big thing that the RX 460 has in it's favour over it's older brethren: the new APIs.
  • turkey3_scratch
    700347 said:
    This is it. For an entry-level and low powered $100 card at this caliber nVidia can't touch this. This is the winning chip. If there will ever be cutdown 1060 with 3B as planned, knowing nVidia, it won't even come near this price.


    The 1060 is whoppingly better. Why would it ever come to this price? Pinch me also if you honestly see an RX 460 for $110.
  • envy14tpe
    Major gap between 470 and 460. Kinda weird. I was expecting more from the 460.
  • AndrewJacksonZA
    1712875 said:
    700347 said:
    This is it. For an entry-level and low powered $100 card at this caliber nVidia can't touch this. This is the winning chip. If there will ever be cutdown 1060 with 3B as planned, knowing nVidia, it won't even come near this price.
    The 1060 is whoppingly better. Why would it ever come to this price? Pinch me also if you honestly see an RX 460 for $110.
    I think rush21hit was talking about the rumoured 3GB 1060 which was supposed to be "severely cut down," to put it mildly, not the real, actual 1060 which is in a whole different class. One can almost buy 3x 460s for 1x 1060.

    Having said that... Let's just wait for the 1050 and 1040 to drop before we declare an absolute winner in this price segment, shall we? But right now, you are correct rush21hit, Nvidia has nothing to compete in this price range. I look forward to seeing the changed Best Graphics Cards for the Money article. ;-)
  • InvalidError
    1712875 said:
    The 1060 is whoppingly better. Why would it ever come to this price? Pinch me also if you honestly see an RX 460 for $110.

    A "cut down 1060" will likely be the 1050 - gotta do something with the 1060 rejects. But when that happens, I don't expect them to be available for much under $200.

    Where prices are concerned, all of them will come down to the MSRPs or lower in a few months. As Chris said, tons of people were waiting for 14/16nm for their next GPU, so they may be on back-order for a while.
  • AndrewJacksonZA
    125865 said:
    Where prices are concerned, all of them will come down to the MSRPs or lower in a few months.
    I think it might be wise for people to sit tight until Black Friday, it's only 109 days away (and counting! Lol.) However, if a situation is urgent, it's urgent. :-)
  • turkey3_scratch
    125865 said:
    1712875 said:
    The 1060 is whoppingly better. Why would it ever come to this price? Pinch me also if you honestly see an RX 460 for $110.
    A "cut down 1060" will likely be the 1050 - gotta do something with the 1060 rejects. But when that happens, I don't expect them to be available for much under $200. Where prices are concerned, all of them will come down to the MSRPs or lower in a few months. As Chris said, tons of people were waiting for 14/16nm for their next GPU, so they may be on back-order for a while.


    I don't understand why they were waiting for 14/16nm so much. Maxwell was a larger jump in price/performance and performance/power than we have seen with Pascal so far. AMD, well, it's not a rebrand at least but their cards aren't that much more efficient. The drop to 16nm for Nvidia has not shown any more of a performance or power increase that they have not achieved on the same node size. Again, I'll refer to Maxwell which was quite great at lowering power a lot and increasing performance a lot, too.
  • Oranthal
    741589 said:
    CURB STOMP! Very relieved this performed better than those leaked benchmarks. So it is indeed a 70w 7870 for $110. The are already sold out btw lol


    Not sold out on newegg now. They tend to say released at 9am est but there is always a lag. I had the same thought with the 480 then bought one as I looked at 8:50 am all the way until 10am.
  • Oranthal
    125865 said:
    1712875 said:
    The 1060 is whoppingly better. Why would it ever come to this price? Pinch me also if you honestly see an RX 460 for $110.
    A "cut down 1060" will likely be the 1050 - gotta do something with the 1060 rejects. But when that happens, I don't expect them to be available for much under $200. Where prices are concerned, all of them will come down to the MSRPs or lower in a few months. As Chris said, tons of people were waiting for 14/16nm for their next GPU, so they may be on back-order for a while.


    Lol Newegg has a 109.99 one right now.
  • Nima84
    So it consumes as much as 950 while being slower or on par at best and more expensive. I'm not impressed at all.
  • turkey3_scratch
    2277213 said:
    125865 said:
    1712875 said:
    The 1060 is whoppingly better. Why would it ever come to this price? Pinch me also if you honestly see an RX 460 for $110.
    A "cut down 1060" will likely be the 1050 - gotta do something with the 1060 rejects. But when that happens, I don't expect them to be available for much under $200. Where prices are concerned, all of them will come down to the MSRPs or lower in a few months. As Chris said, tons of people were waiting for 14/16nm for their next GPU, so they may be on back-order for a while.
    Lol Newegg has a 109.99 one right now.


    $120 for the XFX. What one do you see?
  • payneg1
    I was hoping to see this pitted against the 960 4GB...
  • turkey3_scratch
    Powercolor is $110. XFX has a 4GB card on Amazon for $140. It's an ITX card so I am interested. But it's too expensive.
  • Onus
    I wanted to see one WITHOUT the 6-pin PCIe cable tested. This looks like it should kick the GTX750Ti off its low-power throne, but I want to see benchmarks to be certain. As such, a $110 price isn't unreasonable if we get half-height single-slot versions; Igor gets one as soon as it appears (at a fair price).
  • turkey3_scratch
    47340 said:
    I wanted to see one WITHOUT the 6-pin PCIe cable tested. This looks like it should kick the GTX750Ti off its low-power throne, but I want to see benchmarks to be certain. As such, a $110 price isn't unreasonable if we get half-height single-slot versions; Igor gets one as soon as it appears (at a fair price).


    I don't think we're going to see any without a 6-pin PCIe cable. Furmark goes past 100W, gaming is 85W-90W. It'd have to be severely downclocked.
  • Juha_Bach
    O ffs YES thest a entry level GPU on 1080p. Real smart. Its a video card for poor people for the love of god. Who is gonna buy this for a 1080p ultra gaming? Test it on lower resolution and in more appropriate titles. People buy GPU with games in mind, not other way around. Its like that in propably 99% of cases. You see a game you want to play and when you figure you cant play in on your junk, you buy new parts to make it posible. Thats how people buy GPUs lets not fool ourselfs. So when someone buys RX 460 its gonna be to play specific game and on specific resolution and level of details. Probably 1280 x 1024 or something like that. Most of people are gonna get it for HOTS, Overwatch, Dota, LoL, WoW, etc. So when you get cards like this dont just test it on 1080p+ but test it on lower resolution with higher details and see results with simmilar cards like 270, 950, 370 and 750ti. FFS be more proffesional when doing your job. Its not a mid class or high end card. Its a entry level GPU for poor people.
  • nix27
    Should i buy rx 460 or gtx 950 75w (available for 115$) for hd gaming?
  • turkey3_scratch
    I got mine on Newegg for $120. I got the XFX 2GB version. It was a tough decision with the GTX 950 for $15 more bucks or so. Note that I specifically need a low profile card, so the $125 EVGA ACX 2.0 GTX 950 would not do. A 750Ti was only a bit cheaper and I have owned one in the past. The R7 370, about the same price. So, I got it. Should give me a satisfiable gaming experience.