Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 Review: Dragon Range Meets RTX 4090

Two screens powered by AMD and Nvidia.

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 is a refined dual-screen laptop with a gorgeous main display and nice speakers, but its keyboard is awkward and you need to use its turbo modes to eke out top performance.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Mini LED screen is beautiful and bright

  • +

    Surprisingly good speakers

  • +

    Refined design

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Awkward keyboard and touchpad placement

  • -

    Some other RTX 4090 machines performed better

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

While some laptops are going for bigger screens, Asus has been offering a different solution: more screens. The Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 ($3,999.99 as tested, starting at $3,499.99) is the latest update to its line of dual-display gaming laptops, providing room for your chats, guides or other programs while you play games.

Asus has bumped up to the latest chips from AMD and  Nvidia, including the Ryzen 9 7945HX "Dragon Range" CPU and GeForce RTX 4090 laptop graphics card. They work well enough, but to get maximum performance, we found that it's worth switching performance modes to the ones that use the most power.

The new main mini LED screen is colorful and extremely bright, rivalling the panels on many of the best gaming laptops. They look fantastic. Paired with a solid six-speaker system, games and just about everything else look and sound great.

But the keyboard and mouse, even a few generations in, are still awkward. It’s a good thing that Asus includes a wrist-rest in the box.

Andrew E. Freedman
Senior Editor

Andrew E. Freedman is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on laptops, desktops and gaming. He also keeps up with the latest news. A lover of all things gaming and tech, his previous work has shown up in Tom's Guide, Laptop Mag, Kotaku, PCMag and Complex, among others. Follow him on Threads @FreedmanAE and BlueSky @andrewfreedman.net. You can send him tips on Signal: andrewfreedman.01

  • gfg
    come on guys!! you need to add and update cpu tests. Geekbench 5? :sneaky:
    Reply
  • Roland Of Gilead
    Tell me more about this RTX 40080 for $3,499.99. I'm intrigued by this new SKU ;)
    Reply
  • Dr3ams
    Why are the displays on gaming laptops so small? I already wear glasses. Gaming for hours on a display that small would eventually cause me to get lenses as thick as the display I'm looking at.
    Reply
  • Hortos
    Dr3ams said:
    Why are the displays on gaming laptops so small? I already wear glasses. Gaming for hours on a display that small would eventually cause me to get lenses as thick as the display I'm looking at.
    I kid you not some of us spent well over a decade with 15 inch CRT monitors then maybe 17 inches gaming for hours up hours.
    Reply
  • Dr3ams
    Hortos said:
    I kid you not some of us spent well over a decade with 15 inch CRT monitors then maybe 17 inches gaming for hours up hours.

    Yeah I played Z (from the Bitmap Brothers) and Myst for hours on 15" nd 17" CRT monitors. Probably the reason why I'm now wearing glasses. Playing on a 34" ultrawide isn't going to make my glasses any thinner though.
    Reply
  • helper800
    Dr3ams said:
    Yeah I played Z (from the Bitmap Brothers) and Myst for hours on 15" nd 17" CRT monitors. Probably the reason why I'm now wearing glasses.
    You are wearing glasses now because you eyes are breaking down with age, not that you used small monitors. There is no correlation with screen size to poor eyesight or degradation of said eyesight.
    Reply
  • Dr3ams
    helper800 said:
    You are wearing glasses now because you eyes are breaking down with age, not that you used small monitors. There is no correlation with screen size to poor eyesight or degradation of said eyesight.

    Maybe, maybe not...but I'm sure the amount of time in front of a display has something to do with it.
    Reply
  • helper800
    Dr3ams said:
    Maybe, maybe not...but I'm sure the amount of time in front of a display has something to do with it.
    If that were true I would be blind by now lol. I have at least a decade of screen time of pure screen time and I have 25-25 vision still.
    Reply
  • 10basetom
    Please fix your Walmart affiliate link -- it doesn't even point to the right model.
    Reply