ATI Rage Fury MAXX Review
Benchmark Results - 3DMark 2000 High Polygon Count (4 Lights)
Yet another headache is the polygon tests available in 3DMark 2000. I'm going to have to take time to figure out what's going on here. You must keep in mind that all the non T&L video cards are using the CPU to number crunch while the GeForce boards have a much faster geometry engine inside. Many people have speculated that the GeForce T&L unit isn't as fast as people make it out to be but I totally disagree that it should be anywhere near the performance of a standard Viper II or TNT2 Ultra board. Something is fishy here. Let's take a look at the 32-bit side of things.
As we saw in the previous chart, the same issues are still there. I can see the MAXX and Viper II picking up some ground but without a T&L unit, these cards should stand no chance.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Benchmark Results - 3DMark 2000 High Polygon Count (4 Lights)
Prev Page Benchmark Results - 3DMark 2000 Fill-Rate (quad Texture) Next Page Benchmark Results - TreeMarkThere's a budget GeForce GPU selling in China that not even Nvidia knew it made — RTX 4010 turns out to be a modified RTX A400 workstation GPU
US to patch loopholes that allow China to buy banned AI GPUs from other countries — new regulations include national quotas on GPU exports and a global licensing system