GeForce GTX 480 And 470: From Fermi And GF100 To Actual Cards!

Benchmark Results: Crysis (DirectX 10)

Crysis is perhaps the closest thing to a synthetic in our real-world suite. After all, it’s two and a half years old. Nevertheless, it’s still one of the most demanding titles we can bring to bear against a modern graphics subsystem. Optimized for DirectX 10, older cards like ATI’s Radeon HD 4870 X2 are still capable of putting up a fight in Crysis.

It should come as no shock that the Radeon HD 5970 clinches a first-place finish in all three resolutions. All three of the Radeon HD 5000-series boards we’re testing demonstrate modest performance hits with anti-aliasing applied, with the exception of the dual-GPU 5970 at 2560x1600, which falls off rapidly.

Nvidia’s new GeForce GTX 480 starts off strong, roughly matching the performance of the company’s GeForce GTX 295, but is slowly passed by the previous-gen flagship. Throughout testing, the GTX 480 does maintain better anti-aliased performance, though. Meanwhile, Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 470 is generally outperformed by the Radeon HD 5850, winning only at 2560x1600 with AA applied (though it’s an unplayable configuration, anyway)

Overall, the Radeons show the strongest in Crysis.

This thread is closed for comments
444 comments
    Your comment
  • restatement3dofted
    I have been waiting for this review since freaking January. Tom's Hardware, I love you.

    With official reviews available, the GTX 480 certainly doesn't seem like the rampaging ATI-killer they boasted it would be, especially six months after ATI started rolling out 5xxx cards. Now I suppose I'll just cross my fingers that this causes prices for the 5xxx cards to shift a bit (a guy can dream, can't he?), and wait to see what ATI rolls out next. Unless something drastic happens, I don't see myself choosing a GF100 card over an ATI alternative, at least not for this generation of GPUs.
  • tipoo
    Completely unimpressed. 6 months late. Too expensive. Power hog. Performance not particularly impressive. The Radeon 5k series has been delivering a near identical experience for 6 months now, at a lower price.
  • tpi2007
    hmmm.. so this is a paper launch... six months after and they do a paper launch on a friday evening, after the stock exchange has closed.. smart move by Nvidia, that way people will cool off during the weekend, but I think their stocks won't perform that brilliantly on monday...
  • not at all impressed
  • Godhatesusall
    high power consumption, high prices along with a (small, all things considered) performance edge over ATI is all there is. Are 100$ more for a gtx 480 really worth 5-10% increase in performance?

    Though the big downside of fermi are temps. 97 is a very large(and totally unacceptable) temperature level. IMO fermi cards will start dying from thermal death some months from now.

    I just wanted competition,so that prices would be lower and we(the consumers) could get more bang for our buck. Surely fermi doesnt help alot in that direction(a modest 30$ cut for 5870 and 5850 from ATI and fermi wont stand a chance). It seems AMD/ATI clearly won this round
  • Pei-chen
    Wow, it seems Nvidia actually went ahead and designed a DX11 card and found out how difficult it is to design. ATI/AMD just slapped a DX11 sticker on their DX10 card and sells it as DX11. In half a year HD 5000 will be so outdated that all it can play is DX10 games.
  • outlw6669
    Kinda impressed :/

    The minimum frame rates are quite nice at least...
    Lets talk again when a version with the full 512 SP is released.
  • djtronika
    yawn
  • The way we're meant to be dismayed, gg infirmi
  • randomizer
    I'll keep my GTX275.
  • Traditionally I have been a big nVidia loyalist. Why? Because I think they have better drivers. This however makes me question whether I will stick with them this time around. Its a huge letdown. The performance is not anywhere close to good enough. At this late point in the game ATi likely has something newer than the 5000 series close to launch. It will make people physically sick that they spent the big bucks on these nVidia cards if in 3 months or so there are faster cards from ATi.
  • jennyh
    They held it back for 6 months, but it still can't play Crysis lol. :D
  • Derbixrace
    im glad i bought the 5850, im not even a little impressed :/ ati won this round.
  • Pei-chen
    Now I am really looking forward to DX11 gaming on GTX 400. ATI/AMD has a long way to go to get DX11 at acceptable performance.
  • So... We better start talking about Fermi 2...
  • Honis
    I think I'll stick with my 4870s...
  • eodeo
    gotta love the competition. prices will surely go down and costumer will only benefit. sad that it took nvidia 6 months to get here though..
  • tpi2007
    GTX 480: 10%-15% more performance than a 5870 for a power consumption akin to a 5970, at much higher temperatures, and for 100$ more. More than likely available in limited quantities in two weeks (let's see about that). I have a word for this: faillure.

    Oh, it seems that ATI already has a preview of Catalyst 10.3a, which add another few frames to the already very respcatable 10.3.

    I admit Tom's want to be polite, although I do have to say, from the reviews I've read so far, you seem to be the most objctive, so you deserve congratulations for that, but anyway, to me, it simply is not worth the money. Efficiency is not just a fashion word, it has real world implications, and Nvidia has a lot of homework to do on redesigning their chip.
  • rage machine
    I am so disappointed. I have been using Nvidia since the 6000 series and, unfortunately for them, i will be purchasing an ATI card next. I have a GTX280 and there is really no performance gain big enough to justify the cost, power, and heat levels of the card. I have really gained some newfound respect for ATI though, I look forward to purchasing a card from them. I also believe that eyefinity is going to be the way to go.
  • brett1042002
    Too little, too late.
  • djtronika
    its like waiting for a blind date for 6 months and Laura Bush walks up to the dinner table.
  • tipmen
    So after waiting 6 months this is what i get. I'm speechless. I wonder when the 5890s will come out.
  • thegreathuntingdolphin
    I was impressed, mainly in pricing. Both nvidia cards are clearly better in raw performance, especially since it's beta drivers vs ATI's newest. This is good because I need Eyefinity in a single card solution and the prices of ATI should dropped soon. All that being said...my gosh those temps and power reqs are just plain dumb. 1 GTX 480 is hotter and requires more power than the 5970 for crying out loud! There will have to be some serious power supply upgrades for GTX SLI... 5870 here I come!

    I was impressed how the 4870X2 still pwns it up old school style.

    Anyone else really surprised that Crysis was where the 5870 and 5850 shined?! What happened nvidia?!
  • reprotected
    Performance is clearly disappointing, but this test shows nothing with DX11. Metro 2033 is just one of them. It would make sense to add some strong benchmarks such as Heaven's benchmark and some DX11 games.

    I know that Nvidia always does this: Fail at bad times. We've seen this with the GTX 280 and 4870X2, but this time Nvidia disappointed themselves.

    I also believe ATi will be copying the 500mm2 design and they will put it on their Northern Island (HD6xxx) series.