Completing Hardware Installation
Cooler Master's Storm Scout 2 Advanced uses push-in drive rails to secure 3.5” hard drives, and includes two 2.5” adapter trays that employ the same rails.
Clips hold the fan to the CPU cooler, and a set of nine screws and standoffs hold the motherboard inside the case. The graphics card slides into its slot after removing a couple of slot covers. The drives slide into their brackets. And all of the power supply’s wires are attached to finish the installation. When in doubt, refer to the case and motherboard manual for further instructions.
Do you see anything missing in the shot above? The case originally supported up to seven hard drives, but PowerColor’s PCS+ AXR9 290X graphics card wouldn’t fit with the upper cage assembled. Attached with five screws, the rear wall of the upper cage is removable.
The PCIe power cables look a little messy because they're too short to run behind the motherboard tray. Also, a second CPU power cable (4+4-pin divisible) is permanently attached to our semi-modular supply, which doesn't make sense. Most motherboards only have one auxiliary CPU power header, and semi-modular power supplies are supposed to permanently attach only the universally-required cables. I stashed the spare cable between the motherboard tray and right side panel.
Given what I know now, I probably wouldn’t have picked this case or power supply. Then again, both are priced aggressively, so I might have simply second-guessed myself before buying the same components. At least the finished product is solid and looks great.
was multicore enhancement enabled for both the q1 $1600(asrock z87 pro3) and this quarter's high end pc(asus z97-a)? did it affect the heat output? asus keeps m.c.e. enabled by default. i can't see any other factors atm.
all 3 builds look very well-performing this quarter. looking forward to the perf-value analysis.
The last time I checked the "Samsung 840 EVO MZ-7TE250BW" wasn't an HDD, and nobody wanted us to run OS/2 on a modern gaming system. Please read the charts, wabba
I would go with 16 GB of memory for $85 more, since that’s only $85/$1600=5% more cost. I’d also go ahead and get the Asus 780 for $520. (Side note: I disagree that most would go AMD in a 780 vs 290x, but I know better than to open that can of worms). SLI was mentioned but not used, and I also would not get SLI unless I KNEW it worked with the game I was most interested in. The posts on various forums about SLI causing problems in most games, along with SLI “issues” dating back to 3dFX Voodoo2 cards, keeps me away from SLI.
I also would stay away from “generally stable, but usually not stable in the games I want to play most” (not quoting the author here) overclocking of the system/video card. It’s nice to see it in the charts, but I read about way too many problems in games caused by overclocking for me to rely on it to get my ‘value’.
Lastly, I think the pendulum has swung too far towards “value” for the high end build. I suggest tweaking that a little for future high end builds (eg..780Ti, 16 GB memory, 500GB SSD, but continue to stay away from $1000 CPU, $1200 SLI, etc).