Apple MacBook Pro 13-inch (M1) Review: a Shot in the Arm

Loses Intel but gains more performance and battery life.

Apple MacBook Pro 13-inch (M1)
Editor's Choice
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The 13-inch MacBook Pro with M1 proves Apple can make a potent processor to power a premium laptop with long battery life. It runs cool and quiet, and even Intel apps work just fine with Rosetta. Now if only we could get a 32GB option for true pros, as well as some more ports.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    M1 is powerful and fast

  • +

    Runs cool and quiet

  • +

    Apps just work

  • +

    Long-lasting battery life

  • +

    Strong audio for a laptop

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Limited ports and RAM options

  • -

    Touch Bar isn't as good as function keys

  • -

    Poor webcam

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Apple has branched out on its own. The company has released the first devices with its M1 system on a chip, ditching Intel to make its own processors and dictate its release schedule — and performance — for itself. The 13-inch MacBook Pro ($1,299 to start, $1,899 as tested), is one of three devices with the new processor (the other two are the new MacBook Air and Mac Mini), and frankly, Intel should be a bit worried. In tests against 11th Gen Core laptops, the MacBook Pro held its own with aplomb, proving to be powerful and efficient enough to challenge the best ultraportables and premium laptops.

The transition, with Rosetta 2 emulation of x86 apps, really already feels complete. The MacBook Pro is an incredible, capable surprise. In fact, its biggest limits come from using the same old design meant for Intel laptops, and not being able to scale up to 32GB of RAM for the Pros that need it.

But you can't try this machine and not feel like it's the start of something big.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Andrew E. Freedman
Senior Editor

Andrew E. Freedman is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on laptops, desktops and gaming. He also keeps up with the latest news. A lover of all things gaming and tech, his previous work has shown up in Tom's Guide, Laptop Mag, Kotaku, PCMag and Complex, among others. Follow him on Threads @FreedmanAE and BlueSky @andrewfreedman.net. You can send him tips on Signal: andrewfreedman.01

  • Findecanor
    The port selection and layout is shameful. Just shameful.

    Why can't laptop manufacturers learn that the headphone jack belongs on the left side, where the wire would be out of the way? Practically all wired headphones have the wire coming out of the left earcup.

    Apple's specs don't mention NFC. It is essential for secure pairing of Bluetooth devices that don't have a USB port.
    (The NFC pairing protocol is also a standard, while there is no standard for out-of-band pairing over USB. Apple's keyboards and mice pair over USB using an Apple-proprietary protocol)
    Reply
  • nofanneeded
    Well , Apple should start making 2 in one Mac pros .. Now that the iOS / Ipad pro software will work on the MAbook pro , there is no point in ignoring two in one Macbook pro with Apple Pencil support.

    Another thing I want Tomshardware to test is the TB3 compatibility .. with current TB3 in the market that are labeled compatible with intel based MacBook pro
    Reply
  • nofanneeded
    lolz they are asking $200 for 8GB DDR4 upgrade .. I mean for REAL ?
    Reply
  • Rakanyshu
    Cool but, can it run Cyberpunk 2077? now seriously the low power consumption is a win but i would like to see adobe PS, Ai, AE, Pr Pro and/or Final Cut Pro and audio edition production software compared to intel Macs since thats what most people would be using in a macbook pro
    Reply
  • Goblin4
    The following codecs are supported: (take a guess?). Such as AV1? VP9 etc.
    Also tested: media playback (4K HDR supported).........

    Reported issues: (take a guess?) Bluetooth dropouts, TB/USB C port runs at USB3 (5Gbps) speed only, when using USB 3.2 Gen 2 SSD drives, WiFi 6 implementation slower than Intel's etc.

    TB3/USB4 type C ports supports the following protocols: (take a guess?). Such as (ALT Mode) DisplayPort 1.4 DSC? Can it be used with a 2160p/4K, 10bit, HDR, 120Hz monitor @ full RGB full chroma support?

    All in all, some testing would be nice with some peripherals people commonly use, then maybe a review.

    As far as the Mac Mini M1 is concerned, when can we expect HDMI 2.1? Maybe DP 2.0 (Alt Mode?).
    Reply
  • deesider
    I'm rather envious of the M1 performance. I wish Microsoft could put this much effort into the Surface Pro X.

    Sure, they have a totally different business model to Apple, but still, dreams are free...
    Reply
  • gio2506
    Is it just me, or is Apple's design so outdated?
    Reply
  • deesider
    gio2506 said:
    Is it just me, or is Apple's design so outdated?
    It's almost retro
    Reply
  • Shadowclash10
    nofanneeded said:
    lolz they are asking $200 for 8GB DDR4 upgrade .. I mean for REAL ?

    Sadly Apple has always done that kind of stuff in their Macs. 🤷‍♂️
    Reply
  • Jimbojan
    The test result shows Apple does not have any better design result than Intel's CPU or graphics; in fact, Apple has less power efficient than Intel's in spite of claimed 5nm design vs Intel's 10 nm Xe. That shows the science in Intel is far better than anyone else even at this stage.
    Reply