Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB Review
-
Page 1:Say Hello To A New Pascal-Based GPU
-
Page 2:How We Tested GeForce GTX 1060
-
Page 3:Ashes of the Singularity, Battlefield & GTA V Results
-
Page 4:Hitman, Metro: Last Light Redux & Project CARS
-
Page 5:Rise of the Tomb Raider, The Division & The Witcher 3
-
Page 6:Power Consumption Results
-
Page 7:Efficiency & Over/Underclocking Results
-
Page 8:Frequency, Temperature & Noise Results
-
Page 9:Conclusion
Ashes of the Singularity, Battlefield & GTA V Results
Ashes of the Singularity (DX12)
- ashes 19x10 fps
- ashes 19x10 frot
- ashes 19x10 ftoa
- ashes 19x10 ftor
- ashes 19x10 smoothness
The Radeon RX 480’s strong performance in Ashes of the Singularity staves off Nvidia’s attack right out of the gate. In fact, GeForce GTX 1060 lands closer to the 970’s performance than the 980 it’s supposed to emulate. Although Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 1070 secures a first-place spot, the Radeon R9 390-series boards show their mettle by besting the GTX 980 for second and third place.
- ashes 25x14 fps
- ashes 25x14 frot
- ashes 25x14 ftoa
- ashes 25x14 ftor
- ashes 25x14 smoothness
Not surprisingly, the trend continues from top to bottom at 2560x1440 where AMD’s Radeon RX 480 again slips past GP106. It takes at least a GeForce GTX 980 to surpass Polaris 10, and the 980s still available sell for more than $400.
Aside from the GeForce GTX 960, which clearly struggles due to its 2GB of GDDR5, the rest of the field is mostly playable. But at this early stage, those AMD cards impress most.
Battlefield 4 (DX11)
- bf4 19x10 fps
- bf4 19x10 frot
- bf4 19x10 ftoa
- bf4 19x10 ftor
- bf4 19x10 smoothness
Although the GeForce GTX 1060 can’t quite catch the 980 in Battlefield 4, it comes close. The two cards are almost indistinguishable in our frame rate over time chart. Meanwhile, the 1060 cruises past AMD’s Radeon R9 390, 390X, and RX 480 in a reversal of what we saw from AotS.
- bf4 25x14 fps
- bf4 25x14 frot
- bf4 25x14 ftoa
- bf4 25x14 ftor
- bf4 25x14 smoothness
The only change at 2560x1440 is the GeForce GTX 970 and Radeon R9 390 swapping places. Otherwise, expect playable performance as far down as the Radeon RX 480 using the Ultra preset.
Grand Theft Auto V (DX11)
- gtav 19x10 fps
- gtav 19x10 frot
- gtav 19x10 ftoa
- gtav 19x10 ftor
- gtav 19x10 smoothness
GeForce GTX 1060 again registers slightly lower average performance than GTX 980. Their frame rates over time are nearly identical though, save that sharp dip the 1060 suffers toward the benchmark’s end.
Interestingly, at 1920x1080 the Radeon RX 480 beats both Grenada-based cards. It trails GeForce GTX 970 though, which in turn is slower than GTX 1060.
- gtav 25x14 fps
- gtav 25x14 frot
- gtav 25x14 ftoa
- gtav 25x14 ftor
- gtav 25x14 smoothness
The 1060 achieves playable frame rates at 2560x1440 too, averaging slightly lower performance than GeForce GTX 980 once more.
We’ll keep an eye on where the 1060 lands compared to the GTX 970 as well. After all, those cards are available today for less than $300. If the GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition isn’t notably faster at the same $300 price point, well, then it’s kind of a bust, isn’t it?
MORE: Best Graphics Cards
MORE: Desktop GPU Performance Hierarchy Table
MORE: All Graphics Content
- Say Hello To A New Pascal-Based GPU
- How We Tested GeForce GTX 1060
- Ashes of the Singularity, Battlefield & GTA V Results
- Hitman, Metro: Last Light Redux & Project CARS
- Rise of the Tomb Raider, The Division & The Witcher 3
- Power Consumption Results
- Efficiency & Over/Underclocking Results
- Frequency, Temperature & Noise Results
- Conclusion
Guess I'll recommend either from now on.
Thanks for the review guys, pleasure as always
On that review, as a matter of fact, you use pretty much only DX11 games and only one DX12 title; new API paths are available in Dota2, Talos Principle and Doom 2016... Why not include them, as a reference for the future of gaming, instead of only showing off DX11 games?
I don't know what NVidia is thinking... their marketing campaign might be stronger than I understand and people will still buy the 1060, but value on it just don't make sense right now.
Long story short, if you have Win7 and don't plan to upgrade for the next 2-3 years you have a solid reason to get a GTX 1060. The "plot changes" in favor of RX480 if you are going all forward with Win10.
Honestly I expected something decent but seems they released a cheap GPU for NVidia fans rather than to compete with AMD performance and prices!
I would also like to join others in their request for:
- including 2x RX480s in Crossfire (price-wise they are comparable to a 1070,)
- a benchmark using Doom's Vulkan rendering path, and
- results from the TimeSpy benchmark please.
Thank you again for a relaxing and informative read,
Andrew
A. Card is priced about $50 too high as review kind of indicates.
B. SLI is removed because Nvidia wants you to spend more $$$$$$$ on their higher priced cards. They dont want people trying to achieve playable 4k resolution without paying that Nvidia premium tax.
Right now if I was buying to play 1080-1440 I'd go AMD 480 all the way.
I agree with you there. I imagine that Project Cars is an EXTREMELY niche title compared to the new Doom. If one wants to include a racing game, why not one of the Dirt Rally games?I'll watch out for your next comment. ;-)
Source please, Myrmidonas? Edit: I found one (over at what I personally consider to be a usually Nvidia biased site, no less!): http://www.hardocp.com/article/2016/07/19/nvidia_geforce_gtx_1060_founders_edition_review/4
>no SLI bridge
>$250 for 3gb and 300 for the 6.
>not exactly better than RX480 or even the 980, more like comparable in performance
>small OC headroom, well RX 480 OC headroom was near non-existent too.
Any AIB's RX480 are much better value than this.
*reads AIB's 1060, 480 still much better value
...realizes people would still buy this.
A respectable 25% lead in 1080p and a hefty 32% lead in 1440p.
Likely, the GTX 1060 won't match the performance of an RX 480 in Doom/Vulkan at stock clock, even if overclocked to 2+GHz.
Also the RX 480 seems generally have some performance advantages in next-gen games and API combinations.
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2016/07/19/nvidia_geforce_gtx_1060_founders_edition_review/4#.V448Ue2lilM
A pair of GTX1060 would set you back $500 or more. At that point, might as well go with a 1080 for $50-100 more and not have to worry about multi-GPU performance scaling and compatibility issues. If you drop the SLI motherboard, larger case, extra case cooling, etc., getting a single GTX1080 might be cheaper than getting a pair of GTX1060.
It is not supposed to compete with 200$ 4GB RX 480. For that we will have ~200$ 3GB pascal card whatever they will call it (1050, 1060 3GB).
GTX 1060 6GB supposed to compete with 8GB RX 480 and it does the job for now.
For me it looks like "RIP AMD"
But IMO no matter if a mainstream product or not, a customer buys a computer part expecting not to expend on the same part again at least for 2 years. And the lack of benchmarks in the APIs of tomorrow is sad.