Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Review: More Efficient, Still Expensive

Slimmed down Ada wearing the old Titan price

Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080
(Image: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Even though the RTX 4080 is the second-fastest graphics card right now, it's still clearly hitting CPU bottlenecks, especially in our standard test suite. While the 4080 was 22% slower than the 4090 at 4K, it's only 10% slower at 1440p. This is definitely a card that wants a higher resolution monitor — 3440x1440 ultrawide would be a bit more demanding than 2560x1440, but 4K remains the better choice for non-ray tracing games.

The gap between the 4080 and previous generation cards shrinks as well. It's still 17% faster than a 3090 Ti, 29% faster than a 3080 Ti, and 40% faster than the 3080 10GB, but those aren't massive gen-on-gen gains. The lead over AMD's 6950 XT has also shrunk to 14%, which could mean a serious blowout from the RX 7900 series when those arrive. Overclocking doesn't help much either, providing just 3.8% more performance.

Since the 4080 inherits the 3080 Ti's price point, let's stick with that comparison for more detail. Looking at the individual game charts, the 4080 ranges from being 8% slower in Flight Simulator (the 40-series still underperforms there compared to the 30-series, possibly due to drivers) to being up to 70% faster (Total War: Warhammer 3), with Borderlands 3 also showing around a 40% improvement.

If you use a 1440p monitor, the 4080 might be better than the overkill 4090. It's basically tied with the 4090 in half of the games, and the biggest gap (Borderlands 3) is only 23%. With both GPUs easily clearing 144 fps, this is about as fast as you would reasonably need to go for 1440p gaming purposes… until we get to the ray tracing results.

Complex ray tracing games remain mostly GPU-limited still, with the 4090 leading the 4080 by 34%. Meanwhile, the 4080 beats the 3090 Ti by 27%, the 3080 Ti by 47%, the 3080 by 66%, and the RX 6950 XT by 96%. The margins are a bit smaller than at 4K, but of course both AMD and Nvidia will generally agree that ray tracing games are one of the best options for using some form of upscaling.

With DLSS Quality mode (Balanced in Minecraft), RTX 4080 performance improves by 62%. That's enough to go from clearing 60 fps in all six games to breaking 100 fps. You'd still want a monitor with G-Sync (alternatively a G-Sync Compatible FreeSync display) support for the best experience, but even the most demanding games are well within reach of the 4080.

The 7% GPU overclock and 13% GDDR6X overclock help a bit as well, increasing performance by 6.6%. That suggests the GPU clocks are more important than the memory, though both contribute to the gains. As we'll show later, the minor boost in performance from overclocking also requires more power, though in the case of the 4080 Founders Edition, it's not too bad.

Jarred Walton

Jarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.

  • btmedic04
    At $1200, this card should be DOA on the market. However people will still buy them all up because of mind share. Realistically, this should be an $800-$900 gpu.
    Reply
  • Wisecracker
    Nvidia GPUs also tend to be heavily favored by professional users
    mmmmMehhhhh . . . .Vegas GPU compute on line one . . .
    AMD's new Radeon Pro driver makes Radeon Pro W6800 faster than Nvidia's RTX A5000.
    AMD Rearchitects OpenGL Driver for a 72% Performance Uplift : Read more
    My CAD does OpenGL, too
    :homer:
    Reply
  • saunupe1911
    People flocked to the 4090 as it's a monster but it would be entirely stupid to grab this card while the high end 3000s series exist along with the 4090.

    A 3080 and up will run everything at 2K...and with high refresh rates with DLSS.

    Go big or go home and let this GPU sit! Force Nvidia's hand to lower prices.

    You can't have 2 halo products when there's no demand and the previous gen still exist.
    Reply
  • Math Geek
    they'll cry foul, grumble about the price and even blame retailers for the high price. but only while sitting in line to buy one.......

    man how i wish folks could just get a grip on themselves and let these just sit on shelves for a couple months while Nvidia gets a much needed reality check. but alas they'll sell out in minutes just like always sigh
    Reply
  • chalabam
    Unfortunately the new batch of games is so politized that it makes buying a GPU a bad investment.
    Even when they have the best graphics ever, the gameplay is not worth it.
    Reply
  • gburke
    I am one who likes to have the best to push games to the limit. And I'm usually pretty good about staying on top of current hardware. I can definitely afford it. I "clamored" to get a 3080 at launch and was lucky enough to get one at market value beating out the dreadful scalpers. But makes no sense this time to upgrade over lest gen just for gaming. So I am sitting this one out. I would be curious to know how many others out there like me who doesn't see the real benefit to this new generation hardware for gaming. Honestly, 60fps at 4K on almost all my games is great for me. Not really interested in going above that.
    Reply
  • PlaneInTheSky
    Seeing how much wattage these GPU use in a loop is interesting, but it still tells me nothing regarding real-life cost.

    Cloud gaming suddenly looks more attractive when I realize I won't need to pay to run a GPU at 300 watt.

    The running cost of GPU should now be part of reviews imo.

    Considering how much people in Europe, Japan, and South East Asia are now paying for electricity and how much these new GPU consume.

    Household appliances with similar power usage, usually have their running cost discussed in reviews.
    Reply
  • BaRoMeTrIc
    Math Geek said:
    they'll cry foul, grumble about the price and even blame retailers for the high price. but only while sitting in line to buy one.......

    man how i wish folks could just get a grip on themselves and let these just sit on shelves for a couple months while Nvidia gets a much needed reality check. but alas they'll sell out in minutes just like always sigh
    High end RTX cards have become status symbols amongst gamers.
    Reply
  • Tac 25
    none of my games need it, no reason to buy this thing. The Christmas money is safe.
    Reply
  • sizzling
    I’d like to see a performance per £/€/$ comparison between generations. Normally you would expect this to improve from one generation to the next but I am not seeing it. I bought my mid range 3080 at launch for £754. Seeing these are going to cost £1100-£1200 the performance per £/€/$ seems about flat on last generation. Yeah great, I can get 40-60% more performance for 50% more cost. Fairly disappointing for a new generation card. Look back at how the 3070 & 3080 smashed the performance per £/€/$ compared to a 2080Ti.
    Reply