Slowly but surely, we’re spinning up multiple Tom’s Hardware labs with Cybenetics’ Powenetics hardware/software solution for accurately measuring power consumption.
In brief, Powenetics utilizes Tinkerforge Master Bricks, to which Voltage/Current bricklets are attached. The bricklets are installed between the load and power supply, and they monitor consumption through each of the modified PSU’s auxiliary power connectors and through the PCIe slot by way of a PCIe riser. Custom software logs the readings, allowing us to dial in a sampling rate, pull that data into Excel, and very accurately chart everything from average power across a benchmark run to instantaneous spikes.
The software is set up to log the power consumption of graphics cards, storage devices, and CPUs. However, we’re only using the bricklets relevant to graphics card testing. Nvidia's Titan RTX gets all of its power from the PCIe slot and a pair of eight-pin PCIe connectors. Should future Turing-based boards need three auxiliary power connectors, we can support them, too.
Rather than running Titan RTX through a gaming workload to measure real-world power consumption, we recorded the entirety of SPECviewperf 13.
An average of 223W across SPECviewperf 13 tells us that Titan RTX doesn’t sustain high power use through the professional datasets. However, a spike above 300W, almost 24W higher than Nvidia’s TDP, shows how a frenetic workload can sometimes lead to peaks that exceed specified limits.
More demanding tasks tend to push harder against the card’s ceiling, resulting in a consistently higher average but less dramatic spikes.
Nvidia does a good job of balancing Titan RTX’s power draw between two eight-pin auxiliary connectors and the PCIe slot.
The blue overall power consumption line, representing the sum of all other lines, mostly obeys Nvidia’s 280W limit.
This is our favorite power consumption chart. It shows how Titan RTX leans on its higher power budget as it serves up more performance than Titan V and Titan Xp. Any discussion of efficiency must take into account that both variables increase.
Although this chart is busy, zeroing in on the black line tells us that current over the PCIe slot barely exceeds 4A. That’s well below the PCI-SIG’s 5.5A maximum.
Hammering Titan RTX with FurMark has a big effect on average power consumption, which rises to almost 286W. Peak power use is about 10W lower than what we observed during the SPECviewperf 13 run, though.
The much more consistent workload makes it easier to compare draw over each rail. Again, Nvidia achieves good balance between its two eight-pin auxiliary connectors, while the PCIe slot averages 52W.
Titan Xp was a 250W graphics card sporting Nvidia’s 12 billion-transistor GP102 processor. The company’s reference cooler with its centrifugal fan was good enough to maintain performance, even under the demands of FurMark.
Titan V utilized the same style of cooler. However, the same 250W power limit didn’t give a much more sophisticated 21.1 billion-transistor GV100 processor much room to stretch its legs. As a result, under FurMark, we see power consumption dip as voltage and frequency are throttled back. We’ll see in our thermal measurements on the next page that Titan V simply gets too hot.
For Titan RTX, Nvidia switched to dual axial fans recirculating waste heat back into your case. So long as you ensure ample ventilation, though, that vapor chamber-based cooler keeps up with the 280W+ board.
Current draw over the PCIe slot hovers between 4A and 5A, leaving plenty of headroom under the 5.5A ceiling.
MORE: Best Graphics Cards
MORE: All Graphics Content