Skip to main content

ViewSonic XG2700-4K 27-inch Ultra HD FreeSync Monitor Review

If you're looking for FreeSync, IPS and Ultra HD in one product, choices are slim. ViewSonic has entered this rarified category with a phenomenal effort in the XG2700-4K. This 27-inch monitor is one of the best displays we've ever tested.

Our Verdict

We'd never expect a gaming monitor to have a factory calibration, let alone one that comes this close to perfection. Coupled with excellent contrast, the XG2700-4K delivers a stunning Ultra HD image in games and graphics alike. While some gamers might prefer a faster refresh rate, they won't be able to equal the image accuracy found here. This is one of the very best displays we've reviewed to date.

For

  • Ultra HD resolution
  • FreeSync
  • Perfect accuracy without calibration
  • Contrast
  • Clarity
  • Professional-grade calibration options

Against

  • 40Hz lower FreeSync limit

Introduction

To define a gaming monitor, one usually focuses on things like panel response, input lag, adaptive refresh and blur reduction. But whenever we review a display with 1920x1080 pixels, the priority quickly shifts to resolution. It's pretty obvious that most users find QHD (2560x1440) to be the sweet spot. At that point you're seeing fine details without pixilation or jagged lines and you won't need a thousand-dollar video card to drive it at smooth framerates.

But what if you have that mega-buck system? Of course there's nothing like running a QHD monitor at 100fps with G-Sync or FreeSync. Still, there are those who thirst for the greater pixel density of an Ultra HD (3840x2160) panel in their gaming rig.

We've looked at several such products that offer decent image quality and reasonably fast response given their max refresh limit of 60Hz. It's generally accepted that when you're playing below 80-90fps, adaptive refresh becomes almost necessary. Though many people happily lived without it for years, once G-Sync and FreeSync came on the scene, there was no going back.

By putting the video card in charge of a constantly-varying refresh rate, the monitor only draws a frame when instructed to do so. That means an end to tearing artifacts, which can be very distracting, especially when the action drops below 40fps.

So far, we've only seen a tiny handful of Ultra HD screens with adaptive refresh. Last summer we checked out Acer's XB280HK with Nvidia's G-Sync technology and a 28-inch TN panel. Now we have a 27-inch FreeSync screen in the lab for testing: ViewSonic's new XG2700-4K IPS display.

Specifications

MORE: Best Computer Monitors
MORE: Display Calibration 101


MORE: The Science Behind Tuning Your Monitor
MORE: All Monitor Content

27-inch IPS is a relatively new category among Ultra HD monitors. We've seen plenty of the inexpensive 28-inch TN models and several 32-inch jumbo screens as well. There are even 24-inch panels available though none of them have a gaming focus.

The XG2700-4K is designed and marketed as a gaming product but we were quite surprised upon opening the carton to find a calibration data sheet spec'd for our particular sample. The first thing we did was to research the product's price point and there we received a second surprise. At this writing it sells for around $650 on the street. So is it a professional display or a gaming monitor? The answer is yes on both counts.

Now you won't find a wide-gamut option so technically it doesn't completely qualify. But given the accuracy and performance we discovered in testing, the XG2700-4K is actually better in the sRGB colorspace than most of the dedicated pro screens we've reviewed. In looking at the specs, it says "gaming" more than "color-critical." AMD FreeSync is included, operating over a somewhat narrow range of 40-60Hz. We'd prefer to see a lower limit of 30Hz given the number of pixels in motion. You'll need at least a mid-grade video board to drive it above 40fps. You also get overdrive and low input lag options. The latter removes some processing overhead to help speed up panel response.

But you also get a two-point grayscale editor, a color management system, multiple gamma presets and several picture modes that hit every calibration target without adjustment. Add to that five video inputs and a USB 3.0 hub and you have a monitor that can do just about anything and it costs less than you'd expect for this kind of performance.

Can the XG2700-4K satisfy gamers and graphics pros alike? Let's take a look.

  • picture_perfect
    tearing artifacts, can be very distracting, especially when the action drops below 40fps

    Nope, again tearing is when FPS > refresh.
    Judder is when FPS < refresh.
    The cause and effect are completely different.
    Basic stuff fellas.
    Reply
  • chuckydb
    tearing artifacts, can be very distracting, especially when the action drops below 40fps
    And thats why I still have a hard time taking freesync seriously.
    Reply
  • Pailin
    tearing artifacts, can be very distracting, especially when the action drops below 40fps

    Nope, again tearing is when FPS > refresh.
    Judder is when FPS < refresh.
    The cause and effect are completely different.
    Basic stuff fellas.

    that was one of the sillier comments I've seen in a while.
    Reply
  • Shankovich
    If you're getting a FreeSync monitor, you should have built a rig that doesn't dip past 60 for most games...
    Reply
  • AlistairAB
    LG UD68, 27 inch 4K freesync, with calibrated sRGB mode, $449. Poor LG no one is taking notice, I have it and it is great! No need to spend $650 for the same monitor.
    Reply
  • hardarse7
    I don't understand why anyone would buy a 4k monitor less than 40" in size. That is four 20" FHD screens. I just bought a Samsung 50" 4k tv to use as a monitor, which is like four 25" FHD screens. It is absolutely brilliant to have so much screen space with no bezels in the middle.
    Reply
  • makah
    hardarse7 your eyeballs are going to melt out of your head. like the opening of the ark ceremony
    Reply
  • envy14tpe
    Why would you use a weak GPU, R9-285, to try to game on 4k? At minimum, a Fury should be used.
    Reply
  • picture_perfect
    Pailin said:
    that was one of the sillier comments I've seen in a while.

    Well they got it wrong the last 15 reviews, so somebody should say something.

    Reply
  • loki1944
    I can't understand the appeal of 27 inch 4K; seems small for that rez. 27 inches is good for 1440p surround, but once I have the gpu grunt for 4K surround I'd be more interested in 30-32 in monitors.
    Reply