Partners
The Games selection
violent :
More Mindless Violence
Basic shooting game, but still so powerful! Use the mouse to take aim and shoot at the little beasties before they get to you. Use Space to reload....
|
action :
Yoyo the Star
Yoyo is a young girl who recently graduated and dreams to become a movie star (don't we all). You'll have to guide her on the path to stardom,...
|
Sponsored links
Another Record Broken: 6 Gb SAS, 16 SSDs, 3.4 GB/s!
- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (36) |
- Share
Table of contents
- 1 – New LSI Controllers Plus 16 X25-E Flash SSDs Equal 3.4 GB/s!
- 2 – The SSDs: Sixteen Intel X25-Es
- 3 – Controllers: LSI 9260-8i (RAID Controller) And 9210-8i (HBA)
- 4 – RAID Creation, Test Setup, And Throughput
In late July, we published the article Breaking Records With SSDs: 16 Intel X25-Es Do 2.2 GB/s, which we created after being encouraged by this YouTube video. It is a fun bit of documentation on the initial project that was tackled by Paul Curry, who, like us, went through the efforts for the purpose of promoting decent SSDs. The goal was to illustrate unprecedented storage throughput.
Although we were lucky enough to deliver even better performance numbers on our SSD RAID array (16 Intel X25-E SSDs versus 24 Samsung PB22-J drives), we weren’t really satisfied, and decided to do some more testing using other HBAs and RAID controllers. Intel and LSI came to the rescue, supplying the latest MegaRAID 9210-8i (Intel RS2BL080) and 9260-8i cards. Man the battle stations!
More Bandwidth, Please
The 2.2 GB/s result we achieved already sounds pretty impressive, but some simple math reveals that this number could even be higher, since each of the 16 Intel X25-E flash SSDs is realistically able to provide more than 220 MB/s of throughput. The theoretical maximum for our array should be somewhere around 3.5 GB/s, which is 60% more than what we’ve reached so far. Clearly, we were looking at some sort of bottleneck.
Platform? Check.
Our platform, a Supermicro X8SAX X58 motherboard and an Intel Core i7-920 2.66 GHz quad-core processor with 3 GB DDR3-1333 memory, is definitely fast enough to support higher bandwidth numbers. After all, we used two x16 PCI Express 2.0 slots for the controllers. Each of the 16 lanes is able to serve up 250 MB/s bi-directionally, providing up to 4 GB/s each way on the first generation of PCI Express. On the X58 platform with PCIe 2.0, this is doubled to 8 GB/s. Clearly, the platform wasn’t the issue.
Controllers? Replaced!
We initially used Adaptec’s 5808 cards, which are high-performance RAID HBAs offering balanced performance and a plethora of software-oriented features, used to manage the RAID array. One of our very first checks was the potential bandwidth of these cards, since they employ eight PCI Express 1.1 lanes to interface with the system. But two cards running eight times 250 MB/s still results in 2 GB/s each, or 4 GB/s total. Between two cards, we should have had enough available bandwidth. But it turns out that we didn't.
We decided to use LSI’s latest HBA and RAID products instead. LSI sent us its latest MegaRAID 9260-8i cards, which are SAS 6 Gb/s boards. In addition, Intel became intrigued by the possible performance gains and provided two other cards, namely LSI’s 9210-8i, which it also sells under the Intel brand, named RS2BL080. These aren’t yet available, and they don’t come with a powerful XOR engine, cache, or kick-butt enterprise features. But both cards are among the first HBAs to utilize PCI Express 2.0, which effectively doubles the interface bandwidth using eight PCIe lanes. With this hardware, we were pretty darned confident that we’d be able to break our earlier performance numbers—and we did!
- LSI MEGARAID SAS...
- Building Professional Audio PC [Homebuilt Systems]
- Slow startup times; Event ID 100, Boot Performance Monitoring [Windows 7]
- Adaptec 5xxx Series RAID + Edge/Fanout Extenders [Storage]
- Have we gotten to the point that SSDs are worth it yet? [Storage]
- Dream build system advice [Homebuilt Systems]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!
- 1 / 2
- Next
-
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- I7 Computer build for video editing Premiere CS4
- New build
- Buying Computer, Need Advise Please
- New Comp quesion
- Need help picking the type of cooling I should get
- Suggestions for High-End PC?
- Asus P6T X58, SLI, and a PCI-E1 sound card
- Need advice for photo editing i7 build
- Final touches/Check before purchase
- Plans for my New rigg.
- First Gaming PC Build
- ~$3,000 Mid- to High-Range Gaming System - Help, Suggestions, Comments
- WD Raptor Alternatives (Raid0)
- Hard Drives designed for RAID
Related articles
-
CPU: Intel Core i7-920 With a wide pricing spread between the three available LGA-1366 processors, a $2,500 budget limited this system to the least-expensive Core i7-920. There isn’t much to gain from moving to the Core i7-940, although the copper...
-
As already mentioned, we also compared four of the Memoright Flash SSDs in a RAID 0 array. We used four Seagate Savvio 10K.2 drives as well as four Western Digital WD1500 Raptor drives. We regret that we did not yet have access to four VelociRaptor...
-
This is probably the most important page in the benchmark section of this article. Let’s look at the results of the hard drives in a single-disk configuration, as well as two- and four-drive RAID 0. We’ll also compare the performance results with the...






Holy cow, how much for the total damage?
It would be good to get a benchmark with a Windows XP/Vista/7 showing how long to boot the OS, various games, file copy speed... etc Fair enough these give fast throughput but where are the real world results?
What about some photos of the raid itself?
That's... such an overkill...
Personally, I would like to see a "Part II" to this article showing RAID 5, 6 and 10 setups with the same tests. No database admin or graphic designer, animator or CAD/CAM/GIS professional is going to use RAID 0 with it's inherent vulnerability, or at least they shouldn't.
It would be good to get a benchmark with a Windows XP/Vista/7 showing how long to boot the OS, various games, file copy speed... etc Fair enough these give fast throughput but where are the real world results?
I think with the cost of such a setup these would be ideal for a web or application server, or maybe a small data center. Booting Win 7 would be the least of your problems.
what vga was used?
I wonder if this is the type of storage used in super computers or render farms ?
"None of the SSDs currently available support Serial Attached SCSI (SAS) or 600 MB/s transfer speeds"
False: STEC's Zeus IOPs, and BitMicro's E-Disk Altima support SAS (Zeus supports SAS 6 Gbit). Though these cost about 3-5x more pr GB.
could it be that the computer's integrated graphics card is also connected to that bus and utilizes some bandwidth?
Another question I had is if you really notice a difference running whatever program on 2,2GB/s or 3,4GB/s? Even slow Vista should fly there.
Excellent article, thanks
I don't know about anyone else, but I would like to see Tom's including more pictures of the hardware actually in the Tom's office, set up, and being used in some of the articles that get posted.
So what you need now is for Intel to hook you up with another 6 drives and you can load up the onboard SATA controller, raid 0 that with the others. Or switch platforms to something designed for Quad SLI then really load up on the drives (plus onboard SATA of course.) I say dial up the ridiculous, then see how long it takes to boot/load games. New hobby for the super overclockers, make fastest raid 0 setup.
I'd like to see the actual setup myself, as well..
id love to see this myself as well...
It would be good to get a benchmark with a Windows XP/Vista/7 showing how long to boot the OS, various games, file copy speed... etc Fair enough these give fast throughput but where are the real world results?
As I've said before, it's not all a hardware RAID and thus isn't bootable.
I would love to see some high end Mobo's that incororate these new controllers to leave your PCIe slots free. I would bet it would not be cheap but it certainly would be awesome!
16x Intel X-25 E will set you down approx €10.000
16x Intel X-25 E will set you down approx €10.000
16x Intel X-25 E will set you down approx €10.000