Asus ROG Strix XG35V Monitor Review: A Prime, Curved Pick for FreeSync Gaming

When it comes to flat monitors, we have found that for most users, a 27” screen with a QHD native resolution often represents the best balance between pixel density and performance. At 109ppi, it offers plenty of detail, while presenting a reasonable load for a mid-priced video card to drive.

But curved displays present a different calculus. Curved screens come in a large variety of sizes and resolutions, with maximum refresh rates running anywhere from 60Hz to 165Hz. We’ve test-driven many different panels and today, we’ll be looking at a new model from the Asus Republic of Gamers line, the Strix XG35V, which presents an interesting spec mix of its own.

With 3440x1440 pixels of native resolution in a 35” 21:9 format, it delivers 107ppi. Also, you can drive it up to its 100Hz refresh maximum without breaking your video-card budget. To that, it adds accurate color and high contrast courtesy of a quality vertical-alignment (VA) panel. Let’s take a look.

We’ve looked at many different gaming monitors since high refresh rates and adaptive sync emerged a few years ago. Those two features helped set gaming displays decisively apart from their business-class counterparts. Today, the rift is wider than ever, with curved ultra-wide screens that come in generous sizes. But the one thing that still remains somewhat rare is the inclusion of VA technology in the panel.

Regardless of whether the screen is marketed for work or play, we always prefer the higher contrast that a VA display delivers. It’s not a trifling amount. The least-capable VA panels easily double the dynamic range of the best IPS and TN screens.

The Strix XG35V is one such display. It sports height and pixel density equivalent to that theoretical 27” flat panel we mentioned earlier. It simply expands to the sides to reach 3440 pixels, and it wraps the action around you with a curvy 1800mm radius. Speed and smoothness come thanks to AMD FreeSync support and a native 100Hz refresh rate. And there’s a bonus not commonly found in AMD FreeSync-compatible panels: blur reduction. Asus calls it "ELMB," for Extra Low Motion Blur. (As we know, the "Ultra" adjective in this context is already taken by Nvidia.)

The VA panel delivers contrast in excess of 2000:1, as well as super-accurate color, as confirmed by our tests. FreeSync operates in the somewhat narrow range of 48Hz to 100Hz, which takes Low Framerate Compensation off the table. But the resolution takes some of the burden off your graphics hardware. You won’t need a thousand-dollar video card to drive the XG35V to its optimal performance happy place.

Packaging, Physical Layout & Accessories

Asus never skimps on packaging, and you can rest assured that an XG35V shipped to your door will arrive undamaged unless someone is overtly violent with the carton. Like with all of the ROG displays we’ve reviewed of late, the upright is permanently attached to the panel, so all you need to do is bolt on the base and attach one of the four Light In Motion lenses. (More on those in a moment.) The cable bundle includes HDMI and DisplayPort, along with USB 3.0. The external power supply is Asus’ familiar external brick that looks like an Apple TV. Not only is it spiffy-looking, but it also keeps the display running cool.

Product 360

The first thing you’ll notice is the XG35V’s 1800mm-radius curvature. That measure is the tightest number currently available in any screen size. It produces an obvious wraparound effect that's perfect for first-person shooters and other perspective-type games. For those concerned about image distortion in applications like spreadsheets or word processors, no need to worry: There isn’t any. It’s not a given that a monitor this tightly curved will create a barrel effect. We had no problem performing business tasks on this screen.

In a sop to gamer LED bling, this panel features some built-in lighting effects that project onto the desktop. The lighting emits from the base, and an image is imposed on the desktop from LEDs in the upright. Four different lenses come in the box, and they easily snap in place as your mood changes. You adjust the color and brightness of the projection in the OSD, or you can turn it off altogether. Also, a multi-colored glow comes from a ring around the upright’s attachment point. That, too, can show in different colors, and you can designate a flashing or breathing effect. Using the Asus Aura Sync software, you can tie the lighting effects to gaming action, once you install the included software and attach a supplemental USB cable between the XG35V and your PC.

The styling is exactly what we’ve seen from all Asus ROG monitors over the past year or so. Thinly molded lines and details give the distinct impression of spaceship hull plating. (Think Battlestar Galactica, only less chunky.) High-quality black plastic covers everything in a smooth curve with nary a straight line in sight. It’s a tried-and-true design that continues to appeal to enthusiasts. The screen has an anti-glare layer that is flush-mounted with a thin 9mm bezel around the top and sides, plus a 25mm trim strip across the bottom.

Control comes from four buttons and Asus’ excellently designed OSD joystick. It can be used for nearly all functions by simply pressing it to engage the menu. It and all the keys click satisfyingly. Our only nitpick is that the power button feels the same as the others, making it a little too easy to turn off the monitor accidentally.

The stand is rock-solid, with an all-metal base and a firm movement feel. Rotating this screen to portrait mode is not possible (for obvious reasons), but you do get adjustments for just under 4” of height (10cm), 50° of swivel in each direction, 20° of back tilt, and 5° of forward tilt. The monitor has no built-in speakers, and ventilation is handled by a thin grille that follows one of the contour lines in back. We felt no excessive heat coming from the XG35V after hours of testing and use.

The input panel offers two HDMI ports, one of which supports HDMI version 2.0 with HDCP 2.2. The other is HDMI 1.4, and you get a single DisplayPort input, as well. USB is version 3.0 and consists of one upstream and two downstream ports. Audio comes from a headphone output that you can also connect to powered speakers. Once you’ve made your connections, a cover snaps in place to hide the cables.

MORE: Best Gaming Monitors

MORE: Best Professional Monitors

MORE: How We Test Monitors

MORE: How To Choose A Monitor

MORE: All Monitor Content

Create a new thread in the Reviews comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
18 comments
Comment from the forums
    Your comment
  • shallots
    Actually LFC works with any Adaptive Sync panel with more than 2:1 highest to lowest now (initially they said 2.5:1). So this screen supports LFC.

    And the Sammy CF791 has a 1500R curve, so this isn't the tightest curve available.

    This looks a lot like my ASUS MX34V which I purchased over 12 months ago... Which is also pretty good.
  • loki1944
    Bit of a late review; this panel has been out for about 4 months now. I bought mine mid-February 2018; fantastic colors. Replaced my Rog Swift (TN); will not ever touch another TN panel and I'm not a fan of over-bright IPS either. This is the best monitor I've ever had out of all my TN/IPS/VA panels.
  • Ninjawithagun
    Unfortunately, it's been proven by sales numbers from multiple manufacturers that the FreeSync monitors have horrible return in revenue. In other words, they just don't sell very well. G-Sync monitors are significantly outselling FreeSync monitors. The plain fact of the matter is G-Sync is more expensive, but works better than FreeSync. The two main superior factors of G-Sync over FreeSync are higher refresh rates and wider range in which the dynamic refresh rate works. The one and only advantage FreeSync has is it is cheaper, but that's it.
  • shallots
    Gsync is only better if you can't understand a spec sheet and need someone to spoon feed you information.
    Freesync can basically do everything Gsync can on the top end. It can run on the best HDR panels with the best colours, and the highest and widest range of refresh rates. But Freesync also provides advantages to mid and low end monitors, so it's much more versatile.
    And people say Gsync is better when Freesync can do the same and more (for $less), lol.
  • zyh1987
    can you still call it rog if it’s freesync, or ROG monitor will be strictly fixed refresh rate plus vsync under the whole gpp thing. And Arez Strix for all free sync stuff.
  • Valantar
    This is SO ******* close to being perfect, it kind of pisses me off. The real deal breaker is the huge stand and lack of VESA mount option - that thing will never, ever fit on the raised monitor shelf on my desk, and I won't go back to the hell of neck pain that living without it was. Such a shame, as the size, curvature, panel type, resolution, refresh rate, color accuracy and feature set is entirely spot on, ticking every single box.*


    *Except for: an external power brick? Seriously? Asus expects us to pay almost $800 for a monitor and still deal with an unmanageable and annoying lump on the power cord, making the setup messy and impractical no matter the effort? Really? At least I'd expect it to be high enough quality to not fail in an expensive monitor like this, but in general I don't trust external monitor power bricks - using an external generally means the OEM is cheaping out compared to spending a few bucks extra for heat-resistant components required for an internal one, and I expect them to die within ~3 years.
  • shallots
    It does have a VESA mount I think. It's hidden in the circle on the back.
  • Co BIY
    I think the lack of AMD video card availability has to be hurting Freesync monitor sales. Although overpriced nvidia cards are at least for sale.

    What are the best cards to drive a monitor like this up to it's potential?
  • Kaziel
    Do these have the same panels as Samsung's curved VA's with all the issues that come with them?
  • Valantar
    Anonymous said:
    It does have a VESA mount I think. It's hidden in the circle on the back.


    Hm. The spec sheet does indeed say 100x100 VESA mount, but I've never seen that on these LED projector-equipped monstrosities before. Intriguing.

    Review staff: would you mind looking into this? Is there some way to unscrew the upright?
  • Ninjawithagun
    Anonymous said:
    Gsync is only better if you can't understand a spec sheet and need someone to spoon feed you information.
    Freesync can basically do everything Gsync can on the top end. It can run on the best HDR panels with the best colours, and the highest and widest range of refresh rates. But Freesync also provides advantages to mid and low end monitors, so it's much more versatile.
    And people say Gsync is better when Freesync can do the same and more (for $less), lol.


    Incorrect. G-Sync is still superior in all areas. Guess you can't read a spec sheet. Silly peasant fan boys, when will they ever learn? Cheaper is not always better. Oh, and you are getting confused between FreeSync and Adaptive Sync. Easy mistake for you I'm sure ;-)
  • Ninjawithagun
    Anonymous said:
    I think the lack of AMD video card availability has to be hurting Freesync monitor sales. Although overpriced nvidia cards are at least for sale.

    What are the best cards to drive a monitor like this up to it's potential?


    Your generalization is wrong, but that's okay. Just go to Amazon for a quick reminder of reality. Bottom line, all Nvidia and AMD mid and high end graphics cards are overpriced right now thanks to crypto currency mining extravaganza. To answer your actual question, the best AMD card for use of the Asus ROG XG35V would be a RX Vega 56 or RX Vega 64 card. ~5 million pixels (3440 x 1440 = 4,953,600 pixels) with graphics settings turned to medium or high requires a lot of brute force power from a GPU. Of course, you could choose to use Cross Fire, but micro stutter is something I am no fan of when gaming.
  • shallots
    Anonymous said:
    Anonymous said:
    Gsync is only better if you can't understand a spec sheet and need someone to spoon feed you information.
    Freesync can basically do everything Gsync can on the top end. It can run on the best HDR panels with the best colours, and the highest and widest range of refresh rates. But Freesync also provides advantages to mid and low end monitors, so it's much more versatile.
    And people say Gsync is better when Freesync can do the same and more (for $less), lol.


    Incorrect. G-Sync is still superior in all areas. Guess you can't read a spec sheet. Silly peasant fan boys, when will they ever learn? Cheaper is not always better. Oh, and you are getting confused between FreeSync and Adaptive Sync. Easy mistake for you I'm sure ;-)


    Lol you have no idea what you're talking about. I think you're the one confusing Adaptive Sync, it doesn't do stuff like LFC which helps even the playing field with Gsync. Nice try though.

    Freesync can basically do everything Gsync can and more. I guess you got confused because there are some low and mid range panels which also work with Freesync. Shame on Freesync for also making them better!!?
  • Ninjawithagun
    Anonymous said:
    Anonymous said:
    Anonymous said:
    Gsync is only better if you can't understand a spec sheet and need someone to spoon feed you information.
    Freesync can basically do everything Gsync can on the top end. It can run on the best HDR panels with the best colours, and the highest and widest range of refresh rates. But Freesync also provides advantages to mid and low end monitors, so it's much more versatile.
    And people say Gsync is better when Freesync can do the same and more (for $less), lol.


    Incorrect. G-Sync is still superior in all areas. Guess you can't read a spec sheet. Silly peasant fan boys, when will they ever learn? Cheaper is not always better. Oh, and you are getting confused between FreeSync and Adaptive Sync. Easy mistake for you I'm sure ;-)


    Lol you have no idea what you're talking about. I think you're the one confusing Adaptive Sync, it doesn't do stuff like LFC which helps even the playing field with Gsync. Nice try though.

    Freesync can basically do everything Gsync can and more. I guess you got confused because there are some low and mid range panels which also work with Freesync. Shame on Freesync for also making them better!!?


    Bla bla bla. You have already lost credibility of any kind. Go back into your troll hole.
  • shallots
    Anonymous said:
    Bla bla bla. You have already lost credibility of any kind. Go back into your troll hole.


    Sure... I guess you proved me a troll by calling me names and deflecting from the facts...

    *slow clap*
  • g-unit1111
    Ninjawithagun - watch the language and name calling or you will be taking a short vacation from the forums. Keep it civil or you will be taking a break. Consider this your only warning in this thread.
  • mossberg
    Anonymous said:
    Unfortunately, it's been proven by sales numbers from multiple manufacturers that the FreeSync monitors have horrible return in revenue. In other words, they just don't sell very well. G-Sync monitors are significantly outselling FreeSync monitors. The plain fact of the matter is G-Sync is more expensive, but works better than FreeSync. The two main superior factors of G-Sync over FreeSync are higher refresh rates and wider range in which the dynamic refresh rate works. The one and only advantage FreeSync has is it is cheaper, but that's it.


    Nvidia commands most of the market share, on GPU's. G-sync only works with Nvidia cards. Freesync only works with AMD cards. Kinda a no brainer why G-sync is selling more.

    Also real ninjas don't use guns.
  • barryv88
    Anonymous said:
    Anonymous said:
    Gsync is only better if you can't understand a spec sheet and need someone to spoon feed you information.
    Freesync can basically do everything Gsync can on the top end. It can run on the best HDR panels with the best colours, and the highest and widest range of refresh rates. But Freesync also provides advantages to mid and low end monitors, so it's much more versatile.
    And people say Gsync is better when Freesync can do the same and more (for $less), lol.


    Incorrect. G-Sync is still superior in all areas. Guess you can't read a spec sheet. Silly peasant fan boys, when will they ever learn? Cheaper is not always better. Oh, and you are getting confused between FreeSync and Adaptive Sync. Easy mistake for you I'm sure ;-)


    Superior in all areas? HardOCP actually did a vid on YT, the conclusion being that all those people saw minimal differences and all of them agreed (as most gamers world wide) that paying $200 for the one isn't justifiable.
    I've actually seen some Gsync screens cost as much as $300 more than the FS equivalent ones. THAT right there is the dealbreaker - that kinda cash could easily have gone towards an even beefier GPU. I guess us 'peasant' boys are just wrong about everything hey?