Test Setup And Benchmarks
|Processors||Intel Core i7-3770K (Ivy Bridge) 3.5 GHz at 4.0 GHz (40 * 100 MHz), LGA 1155, 8 MB Shared L3, Hyper-Threading enabled, Power-savings enabled|
|Motherboard||Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H (LGA 1155) Z77 Express Chipset, BIOS F15q|
|Memory||G.Skill 16 GB (4 x 4 GB) DDR3-1600, F3-12800CL9Q2-32GBZL @ 9-9-9-24 and 1.5 V|
|Hard Drive||Crucial m4 SSD 256 GB SATA 6Gb/s|
|Graphics||Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 2 GB|
|Row 5 - Cell 0||Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 3 GB|
|Row 6 - Cell 0||Nvidia GeForce GTX 580 1.5 GB|
|Row 7 - Cell 0||Nvidia GeForce GTX 690 4 GB|
|Row 8 - Cell 0||Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 2 GB|
|Row 9 - Cell 0||Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan 6 GB|
|Row 10 - Cell 0||AMD Radeon HD 7990 6 GB|
|Row 11 - Cell 0||AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition 3 GB|
|Power Supply||Cooler Master UCP-1000 W|
|System Software And Drivers|
|Operating System||Windows 8 Professional 64-bit|
|Graphics Driver||AMD Catalyst 13.5 (Beta 2)|
|Row 17 - Cell 0||Nvidia GeForce Release 320.00|
|Row 18 - Cell 0||Nvidia GeForce Release 320.18 (for GeForce GTX 770 and 780)|
Getting Frame Time Variance Right
Astute readers will notice that the numbers on the following page (and those thereafter) are quite a bit more conservative than the same page in my Radeon HD 7990 review, and there is a reason for this. We were previously reporting the raw and real-world frame rates, and then showing you the frame time variance data with runt and dropped frames still included. The thing is, if that’s not what you experience, it isn’t fair to then point to the raw frame time latencies and hammer AMD on them.
This is why we’re now giving you the more practical frame rates over time, along with frame rate variance numbers that match. The outcome is far less exaggerated, though still very telling in terms of the games where AMD struggles.
|Benchmarks And Settings|
|Battlefield 3||Ultra Quality Preset, v-sync off, 2560x1440, DirectX 11, Going Hunting, 90-Second playback, FCAT|
|Far Cry 3||Ultra Quality Preset, DirectX 11, v-sync off, 2560x1440, Custom Run-Through, 50-Second playback, FCAT|
|Borderlands 2||Highest-Quality Settings, PhysX Low, 16x Anisotropic Filtering, 2560x1440, Custom Run-Through, FCAT|
|Hitman: Absolution||Ultra Quality Preset, MSAA Off, 2560x1440, Built-In Benchmark Sequence, FCAT|
|The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim||Ultra Quality Preset, FXAA Enabled, 2560x1440, Custom Run-Through, 25-Second playback, FCAT|
|BioShock Infinite||Ultra Quality Settings, DirectX 11, Diffusion Depth of Field, 2560x1440, Built-in Benchmark Sequence, FCAT|
|Crysis 3||Very High System Spec, MSAA: Low (2x), High Texture Resolution, 2560x1440, Custom Run-Through, 60-Second Sequence, FCAT|
|Tomb Raider||Ultimate Quality Preset, FXAA Enabled, 16x Anisotropic Filtering, TressFX Hair, 2560x1440, Custom Run-Through, 45-Second Sequence, FCAT|
Current page: Test Setup And BenchmarksPrev Page A Little Glimpse Into The Business Of Graphics Cards Next Page Single-Card Results: Battlefield 3
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
Amazing - this oughtta shake up the market!Reply
CF 7970s > AllReply
Thanks for the article.Reply
Kind of an expected performance increase. Seeing overclocked GTX 680 review was conclusive enough unless you've never seen one. Never expected this card to be getting the Smart Buy award though to be completely honest.
Hey, how about another title for the review?
- GTX 680 Gets a New Cooler, BIOS Update and Price Drop! -
No? I'll think of a better one...
the fact that every single site is comparing nvidia's next-gen stuff with AMD's current gen stuff kinda sickens me. don't start throwing around "Nvidia's got this gen in the bag" till we see what AMD comes up with. they've had what, 1 1/2, 2 years? I'm hoping for GCN 2 and a die shrink on a new architecture.Reply
EzioAsNever expected this card to be getting the Smart Buy award though to be completely honest.Better power consumption than 7970GE.Reply
Less noise than 7970GE.
Runs cooler than 7970GE.
Same FPS as 7970GE.
$50 less cost.
Yeah indeed, why to get the Smart Buy award I wonder...
That is some aggressive pricing right there! LOLReply
Finally, a card that will drop the prices of hd7000 and gtx600 GPUs.Reply
Well in the UK the GTX770 is still more expensive than the HD7970.Reply
10884687 said:When you factor in the 4 games that come with the HD7970 GHz Edition, it is still cheaper than the GTX 770. I find it odd that nVidia had over a year to come up with something to beat AMD in single GPU performance at this price point but failed to deliver.
Yes, there is a bit of power savings. Yes, multi-GPU performance is better. But, that is nothing new. I also wouldn't expect future drivers to deliver much in the way of performance improvements since this card is essentially a GTX 680 v2.
Ultimately, I expected more from nVidia. Yes, this is a polished card out of the gate. But I'm not sure the release of this card will affect AMDs bottom line as things currently stand, performance wise.
Agreed. Sapphire 7970 Ghz ftw <3
None of Nvidia's partners are using the reference cooler so this is just a scam to get better turbo clock speeds and good scores on quiet and cool operation. You've been had Chris and now you've spread Nvidia's lies to your readership.Reply