Join for quick access. Enter your email below and we'll send confirmation plus sign you up to our newsletter.
By submitting your information, you confirm you are aged 16 or over,
have read our
Privacy Policy
and agree to the
Terms & Conditions. Geographical rules apply.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Join the club
Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.
An account already exists for this email address, please log in.
Which Networking Technology Is Right For Your Home?
Netgear provided us with a reviewer’s guide for the WNHDEB111 kit. As far as such docs go, this was a good one, and Netgear in general was beyond helpful in providing information and tools for our tests—tests which might conceivably condemn one or more of its product groups.
According to Netgear, this is the floor plan of a 2,500-square foot, two-storey house in northern California in which company representatives tested the 5 GHz kit. Three 1080p, 20 Mbps video streams were run for a period of three to five hours at different times of the day and were monitored for any signs of jitter or glitches. Following is a graph of the average throughput Netgear reports observing at seven test locations throughout the property.
According to Netgear, there was only one indoor location (#8) with insufficient bandwidth to support all three HD streams at full frame rates. Given that our past experience with video over wireless was little better than abysmal, this level of performance is almost too good to be true from standard consumer gear. Netgear’s document is mum on whether these numbers are based on TCP or UDP protocols, but in referring back to our prior beamforming data, our bets are on UDP. However, as we’ll see, our results go beyond seeking “average” throughput and also include more stringent demands.
