PC Components
CPUs

Single CPU in Dual Operation: P4 3.06 GHz with Hyper-Threading Technology

Features

By Frank Völkel

published 14 November 2002

Comments (0)

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.

Page 12 of 25:

OpenGL-Performance: Quake 3 Arena

Page 1: Low-Cost Dual Processing: P4 At 3.06 GHz
Page 2: Low-Cost Dual Processing: P4 At 3.06 GHz, Continued
Page 3: Details On The P4 3.06 GHz
Page 4: All P4 Cores Compared
Page 5: A New Record: 82 Watts Power Dissipation
Page 6: High-Tech From 3 GHz: New Cooler Design For P4
Page 7: Bidirectional CPU Throttling: Protecting The Voltage Regulator
Page 8: Details Of The Test Setup: Asus P4T533-C And Radeon 9700 Pro
Page 9: Comparison: All The Chipsets For The P4
Page 10: Bandwidth Comparison Of SDRAM, DDR-SDRAM And RDRAM
Page 11: Benchmarks Under Windows XP
Page 12: OpenGL-Performance: Quake 3 Arena
Page 13: DirectX 7 Games: 3D Mark 2000
Page 14: DirectX 8 Hardcore Game: Comanche 4
Page 15: MP3-Audio-Encoding: Lame MP3
Page 16: Video-Encoding MPEG-4: Virtual Dub Und Divx 5.02 Pro
Page 17: SiSoft Sandra 2002 Benchmarks: CPU Und Multimedia
Page 18: Multimedia Performance: PC Mark 2002
Page 19: 3D-Rendering Performance: SPEC Viewperf 7
Page 20: Archiving: WinACE 2.2
Page 21: 3D-Rendering: Cinema 4D XL 7.303
Page 22: Office-/Internet-Performance: Sysmark 2002
Page 23: New Tom's Hardware Video: P4 Head-to-Head - 3.6 GHz V. 3.0 GHz
Page 24: History Of The Tom's Hardware Video
Page 25: Summary: In Some Cases The P4 3.0HT Can Even Beat The 3.6 GHz Version

OpenGL-Performance: Quake 3 Arena

The five runs of Quake 3 Arena revealed a consistent picture. Thanks to Dual-Channel-DDR333, the Athlon XP 2700+ and 2800+ deliver emphatic performance gains compared with the (currently not yet available) XP 2600+. But neither CPU can match the superior performance of the P4/ 3066.